An Introduction to Natural Language Processing Techniques and Framework
for Clinical Implementation in Radiation Oncology
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.02205v2
- Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 11:51:16 GMT
- Title: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing Techniques and Framework
for Clinical Implementation in Radiation Oncology
- Authors: Reza Khanmohammadi, Mohammad M. Ghassemi, Kyle Verdecchia, Ahmed I.
Ghanem, Luo Bing, Indrin J. Chetty, Hassan Bagher-Ebadian, Farzan Siddiqui,
Mohamed Elshaikh, Benjamin Movsas, Kundan Thind
- Abstract summary: We present state-of-the-art NLP applications that employ large language models (LLMs) in radiation oncology research.
LLMs are prone to many errors such as hallucinations, biases, and ethical violations, which necessitate rigorous evaluation and validation.
Our article aims to provide guidance and insights for researchers and clinicians who are interested in developing and using NLP models in clinical radiation oncology.
- Score: 1.2714439146420664
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Natural Language Processing (NLP) is a key technique for developing Medical
Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems that leverage Electronic Health Record
(EHR) data to build diagnostic and prognostic models. NLP enables the
conversion of unstructured clinical text into structured data that can be fed
into AI algorithms. The emergence of the transformer architecture and large
language models (LLMs) has led to remarkable advances in NLP for various
healthcare tasks, such as entity recognition, relation extraction, sentence
similarity, text summarization, and question answering. In this article, we
review the major technical innovations that underpin modern NLP models and
present state-of-the-art NLP applications that employ LLMs in radiation
oncology research. However, these LLMs are prone to many errors such as
hallucinations, biases, and ethical violations, which necessitate rigorous
evaluation and validation before clinical deployment. As such, we propose a
comprehensive framework for assessing the NLP models based on their purpose and
clinical fit, technical performance, bias and trust, legal and ethical
implications, and quality assurance, prior to implementation in clinical
radiation oncology. Our article aims to provide guidance and insights for
researchers and clinicians who are interested in developing and using NLP
models in clinical radiation oncology.
Related papers
- Demystifying Large Language Models for Medicine: A Primer [50.83806796466396]
Large language models (LLMs) represent a transformative class of AI tools capable of revolutionizing various aspects of healthcare.
This tutorial aims to equip healthcare professionals with the tools necessary to effectively integrate LLMs into clinical practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-24T15:41:56Z) - Diagnostic Reasoning in Natural Language: Computational Model and Application [68.47402386668846]
We investigate diagnostic abductive reasoning (DAR) in the context of language-grounded tasks (NL-DAR)
We propose a novel modeling framework for NL-DAR based on Pearl's structural causal models.
We use the resulting dataset to investigate the human decision-making process in NL-DAR.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-09T06:55:37Z) - Clinical Insights: A Comprehensive Review of Language Models in Medicine [1.5020330976600738]
The study traces the evolution of LLMs from their foundational technologies to the latest developments in domain-specific models and multimodal integration.
The paper discusses both the opportunities these technologies present for enhancing clinical efficiency and the challenges they pose in terms of ethics, data privacy, and implementation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-21T15:59:33Z) - Dr-LLaVA: Visual Instruction Tuning with Symbolic Clinical Grounding [53.629132242389716]
Vision-Language Models (VLM) can support clinicians by analyzing medical images and engaging in natural language interactions.
VLMs often exhibit "hallucinogenic" behavior, generating textual outputs not grounded in contextual multimodal information.
We propose a new alignment algorithm that uses symbolic representations of clinical reasoning to ground VLMs in medical knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-29T23:19:28Z) - AI Hospital: Benchmarking Large Language Models in a Multi-agent Medical Interaction Simulator [69.51568871044454]
We introduce textbfAI Hospital, a framework simulating dynamic medical interactions between emphDoctor as player and NPCs.
This setup allows for realistic assessments of LLMs in clinical scenarios.
We develop the Multi-View Medical Evaluation benchmark, utilizing high-quality Chinese medical records and NPCs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-15T06:46:48Z) - Natural Language Programming in Medicine: Administering Evidence Based Clinical Workflows with Autonomous Agents Powered by Generative Large Language Models [29.05425041393475]
Generative Large Language Models (LLMs) hold significant promise in healthcare.
This study assessed the potential of LLMs to function as autonomous agents in a simulated tertiary care medical center.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-05T15:09:57Z) - Knowledge-Infused Prompting: Assessing and Advancing Clinical Text Data
Generation with Large Language Models [48.07083163501746]
Clinical natural language processing requires methods that can address domain-specific challenges.
We propose an innovative, resource-efficient approach, ClinGen, which infuses knowledge into the process.
Our empirical study across 7 clinical NLP tasks and 16 datasets reveals that ClinGen consistently enhances performance across various tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-01T04:37:28Z) - An Empirical Evaluation of Prompting Strategies for Large Language
Models in Zero-Shot Clinical Natural Language Processing [4.758617742396169]
We present a comprehensive and systematic experimental study on prompt engineering for five clinical NLP tasks.
We assessed the prompts proposed in recent literature, including simple prefix, simple cloze, chain of thought, and anticipatory prompts.
We provide novel insights and guidelines for prompt engineering for LLMs in clinical NLP.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-14T19:35:00Z) - Multi-Site Clinical Federated Learning using Recursive and Attentive
Models and NVFlare [13.176351544342735]
This paper develops an integrated framework that addresses data privacy and regulatory compliance challenges.
It includes the development of an integrated framework that addresses data privacy and regulatory compliance challenges while maintaining elevated accuracy and substantiating the efficacy of the proposed approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-28T17:00:32Z) - Rationale production to support clinical decision-making [31.66739991129112]
We apply InfoCal to the task of predicting hospital readmission using hospital discharge notes.
We find each presented model with selected interpretability or feature importance methods yield varying results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-15T09:02:10Z) - VBridge: Connecting the Dots Between Features, Explanations, and Data
for Healthcare Models [85.4333256782337]
VBridge is a visual analytics tool that seamlessly incorporates machine learning explanations into clinicians' decision-making workflow.
We identified three key challenges, including clinicians' unfamiliarity with ML features, lack of contextual information, and the need for cohort-level evidence.
We demonstrated the effectiveness of VBridge through two case studies and expert interviews with four clinicians.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-04T17:34:13Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.