Divide & Conquer for Entailment-aware Multi-hop Evidence Retrieval

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.02616v1
• Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2023 10:31:40 GMT
• Title: Divide & Conquer for Entailment-aware Multi-hop Evidence Retrieval
• Authors: Fan Luo, Mihai Surdeanu
• Abstract summary: We show that textual entailment relation is another important relevance dimension that should be considered. We propose two ensemble models, EAR and EARnest, which tackle each of the sub-tasks separately and then jointly re-rank sentences with the consideration of the diverse relevance signals.
• Score: 25.379528163789082
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Lexical and semantic matches are commonly used as relevance measurements for information retrieval. Together they estimate the semantic equivalence between the query and the candidates. However, semantic equivalence is not the only relevance signal that needs to be considered when retrieving evidences for multi-hop questions. In this work, we demonstrate that textual entailment relation is another important relevance dimension that should be considered. To retrieve evidences that are either semantically equivalent to or entailed by the question simultaneously, we divide the task of evidence retrieval for multi-hop question answering (QA) into two sub-tasks, i.e., semantic textual similarity and inference similarity retrieval. We propose two ensemble models, EAR and EARnest, which tackle each of the sub-tasks separately and then jointly re-rank sentences with the consideration of the diverse relevance signals. Experimental results on HotpotQA verify that our models not only significantly outperform all the single retrieval models it is based on, but is also more effective than two intuitive ensemble baseline models.

Related papers

• Query-oriented Data Augmentation for Session Search [71.84678750612754]
  We propose query-oriented data augmentation to enrich search logs and empower the modeling. We generate supplemental training pairs by altering the most important part of a search context. We develop several strategies to alter the current query, resulting in new training data with varying degrees of difficulty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T08:08:33Z)
• Multi-Label Classification for Implicit Discourse Relation Recognition [10.280148603465697]
  We explore various multi-label classification frameworks to handle implicit discourse relation recognition. We show that multi-label classification methods don't depress performance for single-label prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T19:37:25Z)
• UniKGQA: Unified Retrieval and Reasoning for Solving Multi-hop Question Answering Over Knowledge Graph [89.98762327725112]
  Multi-hop Question Answering over Knowledge Graph(KGQA) aims to find the answer entities that are multiple hops away from the topic entities mentioned in a natural language question. We propose UniKGQA, a novel approach for multi-hop KGQA task, by unifying retrieval and reasoning in both model architecture and parameter learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-02T04:08:09Z)
• Query Expansion Using Contextual Clue Sampling with Language Models [69.51976926838232]
  We propose a combination of an effective filtering strategy and fusion of the retrieved documents based on the generation probability of each context. Our lexical matching based approach achieves a similar top-5/top-20 retrieval accuracy and higher top-100 accuracy compared with the well-established dense retrieval model DPR. For end-to-end QA, the reader model also benefits from our method and achieves the highest Exact-Match score against several competitive baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-13T15:18:04Z)
• Aggregating Pairwise Semantic Differences for Few-Shot Claim Veracity Classification [21.842139093124512]
  We introduce SEED, a novel vector-based method to claim veracity classification. We build on the hypothesis that we can simulate class representative vectors that capture average semantic differences for claim-evidence pairs in a class. Experiments conducted on the FEVER and SCIFACT datasets show consistent improvements over competitive baselines in few-shot settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-11T17:23:37Z)
• Improving Multi-task Generalization Ability for Neural Text Matching via Prompt Learning [54.66399120084227]
  Recent state-of-the-art neural text matching models (PLMs) are hard to generalize to different tasks. We adopt a specialization-generalization training strategy and refer to it as Match-Prompt. In specialization stage, descriptions of different matching tasks are mapped to only a few prompt tokens. In generalization stage, text matching model explores the essential matching signals by being trained on diverse multiple matching tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-06T11:01:08Z)
• Learning with Instance Bundles for Reading Comprehension [61.823444215188296]
  We introduce new supervision techniques that compare question-answer scores across multiple related instances. Specifically, we normalize these scores across various neighborhoods of closely contrasting questions and/or answers. We empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of training with instance bundles on two datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-18T06:17:54Z)
• Coarse-grained decomposition and fine-grained interaction for multi-hop question answering [5.88731657602706]
  Lots of complex queries require multi-hop reasoning. Bi-DAF generally captures only the surface semantics of words in complex questions. We propose a new model architecture for multi-hop question answering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-15T06:56:34Z)
• Match$^2$: A Matching over Matching Model for Similar Question Identification [74.7142127303489]
  Community Question Answering (CQA) has become a primary means for people to acquire knowledge, where people are free to ask questions or submit answers. Similar question identification becomes a core task in CQA which aims to find a similar question from the archived repository whenever a new question is asked. It has long been a challenge to properly measure the similarity between two questions due to the inherent variation of natural language, i.e., there could be different ways to ask a same question or different questions sharing similar expressions. Traditional methods typically take a one-side usage, which leverages the answer as some expanded representation of the
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-21T05:59:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.