Leveraging Large Language Models for Automated Proof Synthesis in Rust

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.03739v2
• Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 23:49:03 GMT
• Title: Leveraging Large Language Models for Automated Proof Synthesis in Rust
• Authors: Jianan Yao, Ziqiao Zhou, Weiteng Chen, Weidong Cui
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown success in code analysis and synthesis. We present a combination of LLMs and static analysis to synthesize invariants, assertions, and other proof structures for a Rust-based formal verification framework called Verus. Our prototype decomposes the verification task into multiple smaller ones, iteratively queries GPT-4, and combines its output with lightweight static analysis.
• Score: 6.202137610101939
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Formal verification can provably guarantee the correctness of critical system software, but the high proof burden has long hindered its wide adoption. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown success in code analysis and synthesis. In this paper, we present a combination of LLMs and static analysis to synthesize invariants, assertions, and other proof structures for a Rust-based formal verification framework called Verus. In a few-shot setting, LLMs demonstrate impressive logical ability in generating postconditions and loop invariants, especially when analyzing short code snippets. However, LLMs lack the ability to retain and propagate context information, a strength of traditional static analysis. Based on these observations, we developed a prototype based on OpenAI's GPT-4 model. Our prototype decomposes the verification task into multiple smaller ones, iteratively queries GPT-4, and combines its output with lightweight static analysis. We evaluated the prototype with a developer in the automation loop on 20 vector-manipulating programs. The results demonstrate that it significantly reduces human effort in writing entry-level proof code.

Related papers

• Evaluating the Ability of Large Language Models to Generate Verifiable Specifications in VeriFast [5.019791860882564]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in a number of software engineering activities. This paper explores the effectiveness of OpenAI's GPT models in generating specifications based on separation logic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T17:44:11Z)
• Automated Proof Generation for Rust Code via Self-Evolution [69.25795662658356]
  We introduce SAFE, a novel framework that overcomes the lack of human-written proof to enable automated proof generation of Rust code. We demonstrate superior efficiency and precision compared to GPT-4o. This advancement leads to a significant improvement in performance, achieving a 70.50% accuracy rate in a benchmark crafted by human experts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T08:15:45Z)
• AssertionBench: A Benchmark to Evaluate Large-Language Models for Assertion Generation [6.3585378855805725]
  We present a novel benchmark to evaluate Large-Language Models' effectiveness for assertion generation. AssertioBench contains 100 curated Verilog hardware designs from OpenCores and formally verified assertions for each design generated from GoldMine and HARM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-26T14:47:28Z)
• Cycles of Thought: Measuring LLM Confidence through Stable Explanations [53.15438489398938]
  Large language models (LLMs) can reach and even surpass human-level accuracy on a variety of benchmarks, but their overconfidence in incorrect responses is still a well-documented failure mode. We propose a framework for measuring an LLM's uncertainty with respect to the distribution of generated explanations for an answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T16:35:30Z)
• MiniCheck: Efficient Fact-Checking of LLMs on Grounding Documents [62.02920842630234]
  We show how to build small fact-checking models that have GPT-4-level performance but for 400x lower cost. We do this by constructing synthetic training data with GPT-4, which involves creating realistic yet challenging instances of factual errors. For evaluation, we unify datasets from recent work on fact-checking and grounding LLM generations into a new benchmark, LLM-AggreFact.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T17:59:10Z)
• E&V: Prompting Large Language Models to Perform Static Analysis by Pseudo-code Execution and Verification [7.745665775992235]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) offer new capabilities for software engineering tasks. LLMs simulate the execution of pseudo-code, effectively conducting static analysis encoded in the pseudo-code with minimal human effort. E&V includes a verification process for pseudo-code execution without needing an external oracle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-13T19:31:00Z)
• LINC: A Neurosymbolic Approach for Logical Reasoning by Combining Language Models with First-Order Logic Provers [60.009969929857704]
  Logical reasoning is an important task for artificial intelligence with potential impacts on science, mathematics, and society. In this work, we reformulating such tasks as modular neurosymbolic programming, which we call LINC. We observe significant performance gains on FOLIO and a balanced subset of ProofWriter for three different models in nearly all experimental conditions we evaluate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T17:58:40Z)
• ReEval: Automatic Hallucination Evaluation for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models via Transferable Adversarial Attacks [91.55895047448249]
  This paper presents ReEval, an LLM-based framework using prompt chaining to perturb the original evidence for generating new test cases. We implement ReEval using ChatGPT and evaluate the resulting variants of two popular open-domain QA datasets. Our generated data is human-readable and useful to trigger hallucination in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T06:37:32Z)
• The Hitchhiker's Guide to Program Analysis: A Journey with Large Language Models [18.026567399243]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a promising alternative to static analysis. In this paper, we take a deep dive into the open space of LLM-assisted static analysis. We develop LLift, a fully automated framework that interfaces with both a static analysis tool and an LLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-01T02:57:43Z)
• Explaining Emergent In-Context Learning as Kernel Regression [61.57151500616111]
  Large language models (LLMs) have initiated a paradigm shift in transfer learning. In this paper, we investigate the reason why a transformer-based language model can accomplish in-context learning after pre-training. We find that during ICL, the attention and hidden features in LLMs match the behaviors of a kernel regression.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T06:45:02Z)
• Benchmarking Large Language Models for Automated Verilog RTL Code Generation [21.747037230069854]
  We characterize the ability of large language models (LLMs) to generate useful Verilog. We construct an evaluation framework comprising test-benches for functional analysis and a flow to test the syntax of Verilog code. Our findings show that across our problem scenarios, the fine-tuning results in LLMs more capable of producing syntactically correct code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-13T16:34:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.