Towards Democratizing AI: A Comparative Analysis of AI as a Service Platforms and the Open Space for Machine Learning Approach

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.04518v1
• Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 08:02:59 GMT
• Title: Towards Democratizing AI: A Comparative Analysis of AI as a Service Platforms and the Open Space for Machine Learning Approach
• Authors: Dennis Rall, Bernhard Bauer, Thomas Fraunholz
• Abstract summary: We compare several popular AI-as-a-Service platforms and identify the key requirements for a platform that can achieve true democratization of AI. Our analysis highlights the need for self-hosting options, high scalability, and openness. Our approach is more comprehensive and effective in meeting the requirements of democratizing AI than existing AI-as-a-Service platforms.
• Score: 1.5500145658862499
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent AI research has significantly reduced the barriers to apply AI, but the process of setting up the necessary tools and frameworks can still be a challenge. While AI-as-a-Service platforms have emerged to simplify the training and deployment of AI models, they still fall short of achieving true democratization of AI. In this paper, we aim to address this gap by comparing several popular AI-as-a-Service platforms and identifying the key requirements for a platform that can achieve true democratization of AI. Our analysis highlights the need for self-hosting options, high scalability, and openness. To address these requirements, we propose our approach: the "Open Space for Machine Learning" platform. Our platform is built on cutting-edge technologies such as Kubernetes, Kubeflow Pipelines, and Ludwig, enabling us to overcome the challenges of democratizing AI. We argue that our approach is more comprehensive and effective in meeting the requirements of democratizing AI than existing AI-as-a-Service platforms.

Related papers

• Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
  We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time. We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups. If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z)
• End-User Development for Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Literature Review [2.347942013388615]
  End-User Development (EUD) can allow people to create, customize, or adapt AI-based systems to their own needs. This paper presents a literature review that aims to shed the light on the current landscape of EUD for AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-14T09:57:36Z)
• AI Maintenance: A Robustness Perspective [91.28724422822003]
  We introduce highlighted robustness challenges in the AI lifecycle and motivate AI maintenance by making analogies to car maintenance. We propose an AI model inspection framework to detect and mitigate robustness risks. Our proposal for AI maintenance facilitates robustness assessment, status tracking, risk scanning, model hardening, and regulation throughout the AI lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-08T15:02:38Z)
• Inherent Limitations of AI Fairness [16.588468396705366]
  The study of AI fairness has rapidly developed into a rich field of research with links to computer science, social science, law, and philosophy. Many technical solutions for measuring and achieving AI fairness have been proposed, yet their approach has been criticized in recent years for being misleading, unrealistic and harmful.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-13T11:23:24Z)
• Needs and Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
  We reflect on the relationship between needs and AI, and call for the realisation of needs-aware AI systems. We discuss some of the most critical gaps, barriers, enablers, and drivers of co-creating future AI-based socio-technical systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-18T15:16:22Z)
• Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) [58.981120701284816]
  Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) will incorporate explicit quantifications and visualizations of user confidence in AI recommendations. It will allow examining and testing of AI system predictions to establish a basis for trust in the systems' decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T18:53:09Z)
• Structured access to AI capabilities: an emerging paradigm for safe AI deployment [0.0]
  Instead of openly disseminating AI systems, developers facilitate controlled, arm's length interactions with their AI systems. Aim is to prevent dangerous AI capabilities from being widely accessible, whilst preserving access to AI capabilities that can be used safely.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-13T19:30:16Z)
• A User-Centred Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Human-Robot Interaction [70.11080854486953]
  We propose a user-centred framework for XAI that focuses on its social-interactive aspect. The framework aims to provide a structure for interactive XAI solutions thought for non-expert users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-27T09:56:23Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• Socially Responsible AI Algorithms: Issues, Purposes, and Challenges [31.382000425295885]
  Technologists and AI researchers have a responsibility to develop trustworthy AI systems. To build long-lasting trust between AI and human beings, we argue that the key is to think beyond algorithmic fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-01T17:34:42Z)
• Empowering Things with Intelligence: A Survey of the Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities in Artificial Intelligence of Things [98.10037444792444]
  We show how AI can empower the IoT to make it faster, smarter, greener, and safer. First, we present progress in AI research for IoT from four perspectives: perceiving, learning, reasoning, and behaving. Finally, we summarize some promising applications of AIoT that are likely to profoundly reshape our world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-17T13:14:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.