Detecting Suspicious Commenter Mob Behaviors on YouTube Using Graph2Vec

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.05791v1
• Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 23:49:29 GMT
• Title: Detecting Suspicious Commenter Mob Behaviors on YouTube Using Graph2Vec
• Authors: Shadi Shajari, Mustafa Alassad, Nitin Agarwal
• Abstract summary: This paper presents a social network analysis-based methodology for detecting suspicious commenter mob-like behaviors among YouTube channels. The method aims to characterize channels based on the level of such behavior and identify com-mon patterns across them. The analysis revealed significant similarities among the channels, shedding light on the prevalence of suspicious commenter behavior.
• Score: 1.1371889042789218
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: YouTube, a widely popular online platform, has transformed the dynamics of con-tent consumption and interaction for users worldwide. With its extensive range of content crea-tors and viewers, YouTube serves as a hub for video sharing, entertainment, and information dissemination. However, the exponential growth of users and their active engagement on the platform has raised concerns regarding suspicious commenter behaviors, particularly in the com-ment section. This paper presents a social network analysis-based methodology for detecting suspicious commenter mob-like behaviors among YouTube channels and the similarities therein. The method aims to characterize channels based on the level of such behavior and identify com-mon patterns across them. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed model, we conducted an analysis of 20 YouTube channels, consisting of 7,782 videos, 294,199 commenters, and 596,982 comments. These channels were specifically selected for propagating false views about the U.S. Military. The analysis revealed significant similarities among the channels, shedding light on the prevalence of suspicious commenter behavior. By understanding these similarities, we contribute to a better understanding of the dynamics of suspicious behavior on YouTube channels, which can inform strategies for addressing and mitigating such behavior.

Related papers

• The Monetisation of Toxicity: Analysing YouTube Content Creators and Controversy-Driven Engagement [1.3108652488669736]
  This paper presents a quantitative analysis of controversial content on YouTube, focusing on the relationship between controversy, toxicity, and monetisation. We introduce a curated dataset comprising 20 controversial YouTube channels extracted from Reddit discussions, including 16,349 videos and more than 105 million comments. We identify and categorise monetisation cues from video descriptions into various models, including affiliate marketing and direct selling. Our findings reveal that while toxic comments correlate with higher engagement, they negatively impact monetisation, indicating that controversy-driven interaction does not necessarily lead to financial gain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-01T13:10:35Z)
• Measuring Strategization in Recommendation: Users Adapt Their Behavior to Shape Future Content [66.71102704873185]
  We test for user strategization by conducting a lab experiment and survey. We find strong evidence of strategization across outcome metrics, including participants' dwell time and use of "likes" Our findings suggest that platforms cannot ignore the effect of their algorithms on user behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T07:36:08Z)
• Tube2Vec: Social and Semantic Embeddings of YouTube Channels [11.321096553990824]
  We create embeddings that capture social sharing behavior, video metadata, and YouTube's video recommendations. We evaluate these embeddings using crowdsourcing and existing datasets. We share embeddings capturing the social and semantic dimensions of 44,000 YouTube channels for the benefit of future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-29T20:43:57Z)
• Analyzing Norm Violations in Live-Stream Chat [49.120561596550395]
  We study the first NLP study dedicated to detecting norm violations in conversations on live-streaming platforms. We define norm violation categories in live-stream chats and annotate 4,583 moderated comments from Twitch. Our results show that appropriate contextual information can boost moderation performance by 35%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T05:58:27Z)
• Subscriptions and external links help drive resentful users to alternative and extremist YouTube videos [7.945705756085774]
  We show that exposure to alternative and extremist channel videos on YouTube is heavily concentrated among a small group of people with high prior levels of gender and racial resentment. Our findings suggest YouTube's algorithms were not sending people down "rabbit holes" during our observation window in 2020. However, the platform continues to play a key role in facilitating exposure to content from alternative and extremist channels among dedicated audiences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-22T20:22:06Z)
• Uncovering the Dark Side of Telegram: Fakes, Clones, Scams, and Conspiracy Movements [67.39353554498636]
  We perform a large-scale analysis of Telegram by collecting 35,382 different channels and over 130,000,000 messages. We find some of the infamous activities also present on privacy-preserving services of the Dark Web, such as carding. We propose a machine learning model that is able to identify fake channels with an accuracy of 86%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-26T14:53:31Z)
• Classifying YouTube Comments Based on Sentiment and Type of Sentence [0.0]
  We address the challenge of text extraction and classification from YouTube comments using well-known statistical measures and machine learning models. The results show that our approach that incorporates conventional methods performs well on the classification task, validating its potential in assisting content creators increase viewer engagement on their channel.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-31T18:08:10Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Understanding YouTube Communities via Subscription-based Channel Embeddings [0.0]
  This paper presents new methods to discover and classify YouTube channels. The methods use a self-supervised learning approach that leverages the public subscription pages of commenters. We create a new dataset to analyze the amount of traffic going to different political content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T22:00:04Z)
• Information Consumption and Social Response in a Segregated Environment: the Case of Gab [74.5095691235917]
  This work provides a characterization of the interaction patterns within Gab around the COVID-19 topic. We find that there are no strong statistical differences in the social response to questionable and reliable content. Our results provide insights toward the understanding of coordinated inauthentic behavior and on the early-warning of information operation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-03T11:34:25Z)
• Mi YouTube es Su YouTube? Analyzing the Cultures using YouTube Thumbnails of Popular Videos [98.87558262467257]
  This study explores culture preferences among countries using the thumbnails of YouTube trending videos. Experimental results indicate that the users from similar cultures shares interests in watching similar videos on YouTube.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-27T20:15:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.