SAIE Framework: Support Alone Isn't Enough -- Advancing LLM Training with Adversarial Remarks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.08107v2
• Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 00:42:58 GMT
• Title: SAIE Framework: Support Alone Isn't Enough -- Advancing LLM Training with Adversarial Remarks
• Authors: Mengsay Loem, Masahiro Kaneko, Naoaki Okazaki
• Abstract summary: This work introduces the SAIE framework, which facilitates supportive and adversarial discussions between learner and partner models. Our empirical evaluation shows that models fine-tuned with the SAIE framework outperform those trained with conventional fine-tuning approaches.
• Score: 47.609417223514605
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) can justify or critique their predictions through discussions with other models or humans, thereby enriching their intrinsic understanding of instances. While proactive discussions in the inference phase have been shown to boost performance, such interactions have not been extensively explored during the training phase. We hypothesize that incorporating interactive discussions into the training process can enhance the models' understanding and improve their reasoning and verbal expression abilities during inference. This work introduces the SAIE framework, which facilitates supportive and adversarial discussions between learner and partner models. The learner model receives responses from the partner, and its parameters are then updated based on this discussion. This dynamic adjustment process continues throughout the training phase, responding to the evolving outputs of the learner model. Our empirical evaluation across various tasks, including math problems, commonsense reasoning, and multi-domain knowledge, demonstrates that models fine-tuned with the SAIE framework outperform those trained with conventional fine-tuning approaches. Furthermore, our method enhances the models' reasoning capabilities, improving both individual and multi-agent inference performance.

Related papers

• A Tutorial on LLM Reasoning: Relevant Methods behind ChatGPT o1 [6.527607790666018]
  OpenAI o1 has shown that applying reinforcement learning to integrate reasoning steps directly during inference can significantly improve a model's reasoning capabilities. We present a comprehensive formulation of reasoning problems and investigate the use of both model-based and model-free approaches to better support this slow-thinking framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-15T17:52:11Z)
• The Inherent Limits of Pretrained LLMs: The Unexpected Convergence of Instruction Tuning and In-Context Learning Capabilities [51.594836904623534]
  We investigate whether instruction-tuned models possess fundamentally different capabilities from base models that are prompted using in-context examples. We show that the performance of instruction-tuned models is significantly correlated with the in-context performance of their base counterparts. Specifically, we extend this understanding to instruction-tuned models, suggesting that their pretraining data similarly sets a limiting boundary on the tasks they can solve.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-15T10:57:55Z)
• Explaining and Mitigating the Modality Gap in Contrastive Multimodal Learning [7.412307614007383]
  Multimodal learning models are designed to bridge different modalities, such as images and text, by learning a shared representation space. These models often exhibit a modality gap, where different modalities occupy distinct regions within the shared representation space. We identify the critical roles of mismatched data pairs and a learnable temperature parameter in causing and perpetuating the modality gap during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T20:36:49Z)
• PersLLM: A Personified Training Approach for Large Language Models [66.16513246245401]
  We propose PersLLM, integrating psychology-grounded principles of personality: social practice, consistency, and dynamic development. We incorporate personality traits directly into the model parameters, enhancing the model's resistance to induction, promoting consistency, and supporting the dynamic evolution of personality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T08:13:22Z)
• Analyzing Persuasive Strategies in Meme Texts: A Fusion of Language Models with Paraphrase Enrichment [0.23020018305241333]
  This paper describes our approach to hierarchical multi-label detection of persuasion techniques in meme texts. The scope of the study encompasses enhancing model performance through innovative training techniques and data augmentation strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T20:25:20Z)
• MultiAgent Collaboration Attack: Investigating Adversarial Attacks in Large Language Model Collaborations via Debate [24.92465108034783]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown exceptional results on current benchmarks when working individually. The advancement in their capabilities, along with a reduction in parameter size and inference times, has facilitated the use of these models as agents. We evaluate the behavior of a network of models collaborating through debate under the influence of an adversary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T20:09:37Z)
• Pre-training Multi-party Dialogue Models with Latent Discourse Inference [85.9683181507206]
  We pre-train a model that understands the discourse structure of multi-party dialogues, namely, to whom each utterance is replying. To fully utilize the unlabeled data, we propose to treat the discourse structures as latent variables, then jointly infer them and pre-train the discourse-aware model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T14:06:27Z)
• Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate [95.10641301155232]
  We present a complementary approach to improve language responses where multiple language model instances propose and debate their individual responses and reasoning processes over multiple rounds to arrive at a common final answer. Our findings indicate that this approach significantly enhances mathematical and strategic reasoning across a number of tasks. Our approach may be directly applied to existing black-box models and uses identical procedure and prompts for all tasks we investigate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T17:55:11Z)
• Hybrid Supervised Reinforced Model for Dialogue Systems [2.1485350418225244]
  The model copes with both tasks required for Dialogue Management: State Tracking and Decision Making. The model achieves greater performance, learning speed and robustness than a non-recurrent baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T12:03:12Z)
• Enhancing Dialogue Generation via Multi-Level Contrastive Learning [57.005432249952406]
  We propose a multi-level contrastive learning paradigm to model the fine-grained quality of the responses with respect to the query. A Rank-aware (RC) network is designed to construct the multi-level contrastive optimization objectives. We build a Knowledge Inference (KI) component to capture the keyword knowledge from the reference during training and exploit such information to encourage the generation of informative words.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-19T02:41:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.