Performance Trade-offs of Watermarking Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09816v1
- Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 11:44:58 GMT
- Title: Performance Trade-offs of Watermarking Large Language Models
- Authors: Anirudh Ajith, Sameer Singh, Danish Pruthi
- Abstract summary: We evaluate the performance of watermarked large language models (LLMs) on a diverse suite of tasks.
We find that watermarking has negligible impact on the performance of tasks posed as k-class classification problems.
For long-form generation tasks, including summarization and translation, we see a drop of 15-20% in the performance due to watermarking.
- Score: 28.556397738117617
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Amidst growing concerns of large language models (LLMs) being misused for
generating misinformation or completing homework assignments, watermarking has
emerged as an effective solution for distinguishing human-written and
LLM-generated text. A prominent watermarking strategy is to embed a signal into
generated text by upsampling a (pseudorandomly-chosen) subset of tokens at
every generation step. Although this signal is imperceptible to a human reader,
it is detectable through statistical testing. However, implanting such signals
alters the model's output distribution and can have unintended effects when
watermarked LLMs are used for downstream applications. In this work, we
evaluate the performance of watermarked LLMs on a diverse suite of tasks,
including text classification, textual entailment, reasoning, question
answering, translation, summarization, and language modeling. We find that
watermarking has negligible impact on the performance of tasks posed as k-class
classification problems in the average case. However, the accuracy can plummet
to that of a random classifier for some scenarios (that occur with
non-negligible probability). Tasks that are cast as multiple-choice questions
and short-form generation are surprisingly unaffected by watermarking. For
long-form generation tasks, including summarization and translation, we see a
drop of 15-20% in the performance due to watermarking. Our findings highlight
the trade-offs that users should be cognizant of when using watermarked models,
and point to cases where future research could improve existing trade-offs.
Related papers
- Less is More: Sparse Watermarking in LLMs with Enhanced Text Quality [27.592486717044455]
We present a novel type of watermark, Sparse Watermark, which aims to mitigate this trade-off by applying watermarks to a small subset of generated tokens distributed across the text.
Our experimental results demonstrate that the proposed watermarking scheme achieves high detectability while generating text that outperforms previous watermarking methods in quality across various tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-17T18:52:12Z) - Token-Specific Watermarking with Enhanced Detectability and Semantic Coherence for Large Language Models [31.062753031312006]
Large language models generate high-quality responses with potential misinformation.
Watermarking is pivotal in this context, which involves embedding hidden markers in texts.
We introduce a novel multi-objective optimization (MOO) approach for watermarking.
Our method simultaneously achieves detectability and semantic integrity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-28T05:43:22Z) - Improving the Generation Quality of Watermarked Large Language Models
via Word Importance Scoring [81.62249424226084]
Token-level watermarking inserts watermarks in the generated texts by altering the token probability distributions.
This watermarking algorithm alters the logits during generation, which can lead to a downgraded text quality.
We propose to improve the quality of texts generated by a watermarked language model by Watermarking with Importance Scoring (WIS)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-16T08:36:00Z) - Unbiased Watermark for Large Language Models [67.43415395591221]
This study examines how significantly watermarks impact the quality of model-generated outputs.
It is possible to integrate watermarks without affecting the output probability distribution.
The presence of watermarks does not compromise the performance of the model in downstream tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-22T12:46:38Z) - Towards Codable Watermarking for Injecting Multi-bits Information to LLMs [86.86436777626959]
Large language models (LLMs) generate texts with increasing fluency and realism.
Existing watermarking methods are encoding-inefficient and cannot flexibly meet the diverse information encoding needs.
We propose Codable Text Watermarking for LLMs (CTWL) that allows text watermarks to carry multi-bit customizable information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-29T14:11:15Z) - On the Reliability of Watermarks for Large Language Models [95.87476978352659]
We study the robustness of watermarked text after it is re-written by humans, paraphrased by a non-watermarked LLM, or mixed into a longer hand-written document.
We find that watermarks remain detectable even after human and machine paraphrasing.
We also consider a range of new detection schemes that are sensitive to short spans of watermarked text embedded inside a large document.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-07T17:58:48Z) - Watermarking Text Generated by Black-Box Language Models [103.52541557216766]
A watermark-based method was proposed for white-box LLMs, allowing them to embed watermarks during text generation.
A detection algorithm aware of the list can identify the watermarked text.
We develop a watermarking framework for black-box language model usage scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-14T07:37:33Z) - A Watermark for Large Language Models [84.95327142027183]
We propose a watermarking framework for proprietary language models.
The watermark can be embedded with negligible impact on text quality.
It can be detected using an efficient open-source algorithm without access to the language model API or parameters.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-24T18:52:59Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.