Contribution Evaluation in Federated Learning: Examining Current Approaches

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09856v1
• Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 12:32:44 GMT
• Title: Contribution Evaluation in Federated Learning: Examining Current Approaches
• Authors: Vasilis Siomos and Jonathan Passerat-Palmbach
• Abstract summary: In Federated Learning, clients with private and potentially heterogeneous data and compute resources come together to train a common model without raw data ever leaving their locale. The Evaluation Contribution (CE) problem is Quantitatively evaluating the worth of these contributions is termed the Evaluation Contribution (CE) problem. We benchmark some of the most promising state-of-the-art approaches, along with a new one we introduce, on MNIST and CIFAR-10, to showcase their differences.
• Score: 1.3688201404977818
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) has seen increasing interest in cases where entities want to collaboratively train models while maintaining privacy and governance over their data. In FL, clients with private and potentially heterogeneous data and compute resources come together to train a common model without raw data ever leaving their locale. Instead, the participants contribute by sharing local model updates, which, naturally, differ in quality. Quantitatively evaluating the worth of these contributions is termed the Contribution Evaluation (CE) problem. We review current CE approaches from the underlying mathematical framework to efficiently calculate a fair value for each client. Furthermore, we benchmark some of the most promising state-of-the-art approaches, along with a new one we introduce, on MNIST and CIFAR-10, to showcase their differences. Designing a fair and efficient CE method, while a small part of the overall FL system design, is tantamount to the mainstream adoption of FL.

Related papers

• Can We Theoretically Quantify the Impacts of Local Updates on the Generalization Performance of Federated Learning? [50.03434441234569]
  Federated Learning (FL) has gained significant popularity due to its effectiveness in training machine learning models across diverse sites without requiring direct data sharing. While various algorithms have shown that FL with local updates is a communication-efficient distributed learning framework, the generalization performance of FL with local updates has received comparatively less attention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-05T19:00:18Z)
• Redefining Contributions: Shapley-Driven Federated Learning [3.9539878659683363]
  Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a pivotal approach in machine learning. It is challenging to ensure global model convergence when participants do not contribute equally and/or honestly. This paper proposes a novel contribution assessment method called ShapFed for fine-grained evaluation of participant contributions in FL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-01T22:40:31Z)
• Multi-level Personalized Federated Learning on Heterogeneous and Long-Tailed Data [10.64629029156029]
  We introduce an innovative personalized Federated Learning framework, Multi-level Personalized Federated Learning (MuPFL) MuPFL integrates three pivotal modules: Biased Activation Value Dropout (BAVD), Adaptive Cluster-based Model Update (ACMU) and Prior Knowledge-assisted Fine-tuning (PKCF) Experiments on diverse real-world datasets show that MuPFL consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, even under extreme non-i.i.d. and long-tail conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T11:52:53Z)
• An Aggregation-Free Federated Learning for Tackling Data Heterogeneity [50.44021981013037]
  Federated Learning (FL) relies on the effectiveness of utilizing knowledge from distributed datasets. Traditional FL methods adopt an aggregate-then-adapt framework, where clients update local models based on a global model aggregated by the server from the previous training round. We introduce FedAF, a novel aggregation-free FL algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T05:55:23Z)
• KnFu: Effective Knowledge Fusion [5.305607095162403]
  Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a prominent alternative to the traditional centralized learning approach. The paper proposes Effective Knowledge Fusion (KnFu) algorithm that evaluates knowledge of local models to only fuse semantic neighbors' effective knowledge for each client. A key conclusion of the work is that in scenarios with large and highly heterogeneous local datasets, local training could be preferable to knowledge fusion-based solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T15:49:48Z)
• FedImpro: Measuring and Improving Client Update in Federated Learning [77.68805026788836]
  Federated Learning (FL) models often experience client drift caused by heterogeneous data. We present an alternative perspective on client drift and aim to mitigate it by generating improved local models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-10T18:14:57Z)
• Federated Learning Can Find Friends That Are Advantageous [14.993730469216546]
  In Federated Learning (FL), the distributed nature and heterogeneity of client data present both opportunities and challenges. We introduce a novel algorithm that assigns adaptive aggregation weights to clients participating in FL training, identifying those with data distributions most conducive to a specific learning objective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T17:46:37Z)
• A Survey on Efficient Federated Learning Methods for Foundation Model Training [62.473245910234304]
  Federated Learning (FL) has become an established technique to facilitate privacy-preserving collaborative training across a multitude of clients. In the wake of Foundation Models (FM), the reality is different for many deep learning applications. We discuss the benefits and drawbacks of parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) for FL applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-09T10:22:23Z)
• Tunable Soft Prompts are Messengers in Federated Learning [55.924749085481544]
  Federated learning (FL) enables multiple participants to collaboratively train machine learning models using decentralized data sources. The lack of model privacy protection in FL becomes an unneglectable challenge. We propose a novel FL training approach that accomplishes information exchange among participants via tunable soft prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-12T11:01:10Z)
• Data Valuation and Detections in Federated Learning [4.899818550820576]
  Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training while preserving the privacy of raw data. A challenge in this framework is the fair and efficient valuation of data, which is crucial for incentivizing clients to contribute high-quality data in the FL task. This paper introduces a novel privacy-preserving method for evaluating client contributions and selecting relevant datasets without a pre-specified training algorithm in an FL task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-09T12:01:32Z)
• FedDM: Iterative Distribution Matching for Communication-Efficient Federated Learning [87.08902493524556]
  Federated learning(FL) has recently attracted increasing attention from academia and industry. We propose FedDM to build the global training objective from multiple local surrogate functions. In detail, we construct synthetic sets of data on each client to locally match the loss landscape from original data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T04:55:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.