Hijacking Large Language Models via Adversarial In-Context Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09948v3
• Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 14:49:44 GMT
• Title: Hijacking Large Language Models via Adversarial In-Context Learning
• Authors: Xiangyu Zhou, Yao Qiang, Saleh Zare Zade, Prashant Khanduri, Dongxiao Zhu,
• Abstract summary: In-context learning (ICL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm leveraging LLMs for specific downstream tasks by utilizing labeled examples as demonstrations (demos) in the preconditioned prompts.<n>Existing attacks are either easy to detect, require a trigger in user input, or lack specificity towards ICL.<n>This work introduces a novel transferable prompt injection attack against ICL, aiming to hijack LLMs to generate the target output or elicit harmful responses.
• Score: 10.416972293173993
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In-context learning (ICL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm leveraging LLMs for specific downstream tasks by utilizing labeled examples as demonstrations (demos) in the preconditioned prompts. Despite its promising performance, crafted adversarial attacks pose a notable threat to the robustness of LLMs. Existing attacks are either easy to detect, require a trigger in user input, or lack specificity towards ICL. To address these issues, this work introduces a novel transferable prompt injection attack against ICL, aiming to hijack LLMs to generate the target output or elicit harmful responses. In our threat model, the hacker acts as a model publisher who leverages a gradient-based prompt search method to learn and append imperceptible adversarial suffixes to the in-context demos via prompt injection. We also propose effective defense strategies using a few shots of clean demos, enhancing the robustness of LLMs during ICL. Extensive experimental results across various classification and jailbreak tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed attack and defense strategies. This work highlights the significant security vulnerabilities of LLMs during ICL and underscores the need for further in-depth studies.

Related papers

• Commercial LLM Agents Are Already Vulnerable to Simple Yet Dangerous Attacks [88.84977282952602]
  A high volume of recent ML security literature focuses on attacks against aligned large language models (LLMs)<n>In this paper, we analyze security and privacy vulnerabilities that are unique to LLM agents.<n>We conduct a series of illustrative attacks on popular open-source and commercial agents, demonstrating the immediate practical implications of their vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-12T17:19:36Z)
• Understanding and Enhancing the Transferability of Jailbreaking Attacks [12.446931518819875]
  Jailbreaking attacks can effectively manipulate open-source large language models (LLMs) to produce harmful responses. This work investigates the transferability of jailbreaking attacks by analysing their impact on the model's intent perception. We propose the Perceived-importance Flatten (PiF) method, which uniformly disperses the model's focus across neutral-intent tokens in the original input.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T10:29:54Z)
• The TIP of the Iceberg: Revealing a Hidden Class of Task-in-Prompt Adversarial Attacks on LLMs [1.9424018922013224]
  We present a novel class of jailbreak adversarial attacks on LLMs.<n>Our approach embeds sequence-to-sequence tasks into the model's prompt to indirectly generate prohibited inputs.<n>We demonstrate that our techniques successfully circumvent safeguards in six state-of-the-art language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-27T12:48:47Z)
• Attention Tracker: Detecting Prompt Injection Attacks in LLMs [62.247841717696765]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized various domains but remain vulnerable to prompt injection attacks.<n>We introduce the concept of the distraction effect, where specific attention heads shift focus from the original instruction to the injected instruction.<n>We propose Attention Tracker, a training-free detection method that tracks attention patterns on instruction to detect prompt injection attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T04:05:59Z)
• You Know What I'm Saying: Jailbreak Attack via Implicit Reference [22.520950422702757]
  This study identifies a previously overlooked vulnerability, which we term Attack via Implicit Reference (AIR) AIR decomposes a malicious objective into permissible objectives and links them through implicit references within the context. Our experiments demonstrate AIR's effectiveness across state-of-the-art LLMs, achieving an attack success rate (ASR) exceeding 90% on most models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T18:42:57Z)
• PROMPTFUZZ: Harnessing Fuzzing Techniques for Robust Testing of Prompt Injection in LLMs [2.4117856871959953]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained widespread use in various applications due to their powerful capability to generate human-like text.<n> prompt injection attacks involve overwriting a model's original instructions with malicious prompts to manipulate the generated text.<n>We propose PROMPTFUZZ, a novel testing framework that leverages fuzzing techniques to assess the robustness of LLMs against prompt injection attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T06:08:32Z)
• Human-Interpretable Adversarial Prompt Attack on Large Language Models with Situational Context [49.13497493053742]
  This research explores converting a nonsensical suffix attack into a sensible prompt via a situation-driven contextual re-writing. We combine an independent, meaningful adversarial insertion and situations derived from movies to check if this can trick an LLM. Our approach demonstrates that a successful situation-driven attack can be executed on both open-source and proprietary LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T19:47:26Z)
• Purple-teaming LLMs with Adversarial Defender Training [57.535241000787416]
  We present Purple-teaming LLMs with Adversarial Defender training (PAD) PAD is a pipeline designed to safeguard LLMs by novelly incorporating the red-teaming (attack) and blue-teaming (safety training) techniques. PAD significantly outperforms existing baselines in both finding effective attacks and establishing a robust safe guardrail.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T23:25:30Z)
• Learning diverse attacks on large language models for robust red-teaming and safety tuning [126.32539952157083]
  Red-teaming, or identifying prompts that elicit harmful responses, is a critical step in ensuring the safe deployment of large language models. We show that even with explicit regularization to favor novelty and diversity, existing approaches suffer from mode collapse or fail to generate effective attacks. We propose to use GFlowNet fine-tuning, followed by a secondary smoothing phase, to train the attacker model to generate diverse and effective attack prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T19:16:17Z)
• Prompt Leakage effect and defense strategies for multi-turn LLM interactions [95.33778028192593]
  Leakage of system prompts may compromise intellectual property and act as adversarial reconnaissance for an attacker. We design a unique threat model which leverages the LLM sycophancy effect and elevates the average attack success rate (ASR) from 17.7% to 86.2% in a multi-turn setting. We measure the mitigation effect of 7 black-box defense strategies, along with finetuning an open-source model to defend against leakage attempts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T23:39:58Z)
• AdaShield: Safeguarding Multimodal Large Language Models from Structure-based Attack via Adaptive Shield Prompting [54.931241667414184]
  We propose textbfAdaptive textbfShield Prompting, which prepends inputs with defense prompts to defend MLLMs against structure-based jailbreak attacks. Our methods can consistently improve MLLMs' robustness against structure-based jailbreak attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T15:57:13Z)
• Learning to Poison Large Language Models During Instruction Tuning [12.521338629194503]
  This work identifies additional security risks in Large Language Models (LLMs) by designing a new data poisoning attack tailored to exploit the instruction tuning process. We propose a novel gradient-guided backdoor trigger learning (GBTL) algorithm to identify adversarial triggers efficiently. We propose two defense strategies against data poisoning attacks, including in-context learning (ICL) and continuous learning (CL)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T01:30:03Z)
• Data Poisoning for In-context Learning [49.77204165250528]
  In-context learning (ICL) has been recognized for its innovative ability to adapt to new tasks. This paper delves into the critical issue of ICL's susceptibility to data poisoning attacks. We introduce ICLPoison, a specialized attacking framework conceived to exploit the learning mechanisms of ICL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-03T14:20:20Z)
• Revisiting Jailbreaking for Large Language Models: A Representation Engineering Perspective [43.94115802328438]
  Recent surge in jailbreaking attacks has revealed significant vulnerabilities in Large Language Models (LLMs) when exposed to malicious inputs. We suggest that the self-safeguarding capability of LLMs is linked to specific activity patterns within their representation space. Our findings demonstrate that these patterns can be detected with just a few pairs of contrastive queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T00:50:04Z)
• Benchmarking and Defending Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks on Large Language Models [82.98081731588717]
  Integration of large language models with external content exposes applications to indirect prompt injection attacks. We introduce the first benchmark for indirect prompt injection attacks, named BIPIA, to evaluate the risk of such attacks. We develop two black-box methods based on prompt learning and a white-box defense method based on fine-tuning with adversarial training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T01:08:39Z)
• Jailbreak and Guard Aligned Language Models with Only Few In-Context Demonstrations [38.437893814759086]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable success in various tasks, yet their safety and the risk of generating harmful content remain pressing concerns. We propose the In-Context Attack (ICA) which employs harmful demonstrations to subvert LLMs, and the In-Context Defense (ICD) which bolsters model resilience through examples that demonstrate refusal to produce harmful responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T07:50:29Z)
• Evaluating the Instruction-Following Robustness of Large Language Models to Prompt Injection [70.28425745910711]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional proficiency in instruction-following. This capability brings with it the risk of prompt injection attacks. We evaluate the robustness of instruction-following LLMs against such attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-17T06:21:50Z)
• Adversarial Demonstration Attacks on Large Language Models [43.15298174675082]
  We investigate the security concern of in-context learning (ICL) from an adversarial perspective. We propose a novel attack method named advICL, which aims to manipulate only the demonstration without changing the input to mislead the models. Our results demonstrate that as the number of demonstrations increases, the robustness of in-context learning would decrease.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T09:40:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.