Data-driven Prior Learning for Bayesian Optimisation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.14653v2
• Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 07:46:56 GMT
• Title: Data-driven Prior Learning for Bayesian Optimisation
• Authors: Sigrid Passano Hellan, Christopher G. Lucas, Nigel H. Goddard,
• Abstract summary: We show that PLeBO and prior transfer find good inputs in fewer evaluations. We validate the learned priors and compare to a breadth of transfer learning approaches. We show that PLeBO and prior transfer find good inputs in fewer evaluations.
• Score: 5.199765487172328
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Transfer learning for Bayesian optimisation has generally assumed a strong similarity between optimisation tasks, with at least a subset having similar optimal inputs. This assumption can reduce computational costs, but it is violated in a wide range of optimisation problems where transfer learning may nonetheless be useful. We replace this assumption with a weaker one only requiring the shape of the optimisation landscape to be similar, and analyse the recent method Prior Learning for Bayesian Optimisation - PLeBO - in this setting. By learning priors for the hyperparameters of the Gaussian process surrogate model we can better approximate the underlying function, especially for few function evaluations. We validate the learned priors and compare to a breadth of transfer learning approaches, using synthetic data and a recent air pollution optimisation problem as benchmarks. We show that PLeBO and prior transfer find good inputs in fewer evaluations.

Related papers

• Forecasting Outside the Box: Application-Driven Optimal Pointwise Forecasts for Stochastic Optimization [0.0]
  We present an integrated learning and optimization procedure that yields the best approximation of an unknown situation. Numerical results conducted with inventory problems from the literature as well as a bike-sharing problem with real data demonstrate that the proposed approach performs well.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T21:54:50Z)
• Efficient Bayesian Optimization with Deep Kernel Learning and Transformer Pre-trained on Multiple Heterogeneous Datasets [9.510327380529892]
  We propose a simple approach to pre-train a surrogate, which is a Gaussian process (GP) with a kernel defined on deep features learned from a Transformer-based encoder. Experiments on both synthetic and real benchmark problems demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed pre-training and transfer BO strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-09T01:56:10Z)
• Optimizer Amalgamation [124.33523126363728]
  We are motivated to study a new problem named Amalgamation: how can we best combine a pool of "teacher" amalgamations into a single "student" that can have stronger problem-specific performance? First, we define three differentiable mechanisms to amalgamate a pool of analyticals by gradient descent. In order to reduce variance of the process, we also explore methods to stabilize the process by perturbing the target.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-12T16:07:57Z)
• Teaching Networks to Solve Optimization Problems [13.803078209630444]
  We propose to replace the iterative solvers altogether with a trainable parametric set function. We show the feasibility of learning such parametric (set) functions to solve various classic optimization problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-08T19:13:13Z)
• SnAKe: Bayesian Optimization with Pathwise Exploration [9.807656882149319]
  We consider a novel setting where the expense of evaluating the function can increase significantly when making large input changes between iterations. This paper investigates the problem and introduces 'Sequential Bayesian Optimization via Adaptive Connecting Samples' (SnAKe) It provides a solution by considering future queries and preemptively building optimization paths that minimize input costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-31T19:42:56Z)
• Adaptive Optimization with Examplewise Gradients [23.504973357538418]
  We propose a new, more general approach to the design of gradient-based optimization methods for machine learning. In this new framework, iterations assume access to a batch of estimates per parameter, rather than a single estimate. This better reflects the information that is actually available in typical machine learning setups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-30T23:37:01Z)
• Outlier-Robust Sparse Estimation via Non-Convex Optimization [73.18654719887205]
  We explore the connection between high-dimensional statistics and non-robust optimization in the presence of sparsity constraints. We develop novel and simple optimization formulations for these problems. As a corollary, we obtain that any first-order method that efficiently converges to station yields an efficient algorithm for these tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-23T17:38:24Z)
• Divide and Learn: A Divide and Conquer Approach for Predict+Optimize [50.03608569227359]
  The predict+optimize problem combines machine learning ofproblem coefficients with a optimization prob-lem that uses the predicted coefficients. We show how to directlyexpress the loss of the optimization problem in terms of thepredicted coefficients as a piece-wise linear function. We propose a novel divide and algorithm to tackle optimization problems without this restriction and predict itscoefficients using the optimization loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-04T00:26:56Z)
• Fast Rates for Contextual Linear Optimization [52.39202699484225]
  We show that a naive plug-in approach achieves regret convergence rates that are significantly faster than methods that directly optimize downstream decision performance. Our results are overall positive for practice: predictive models are easy and fast to train using existing tools, simple to interpret, and, as we show, lead to decisions that perform very well.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-05T18:43:59Z)
• A Primer on Zeroth-Order Optimization in Signal Processing and Machine Learning [95.85269649177336]
  ZO optimization iteratively performs three major steps: gradient estimation, descent direction, and solution update. We demonstrate promising applications of ZO optimization, such as evaluating and generating explanations from black-box deep learning models, and efficient online sensor management.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-11T06:50:35Z)
• Incorporating Expert Prior in Bayesian Optimisation via Space Warping [54.412024556499254]
  In big search spaces the algorithm goes through several low function value regions before reaching the optimum of the function. One approach to subside this cold start phase is to use prior knowledge that can accelerate the optimisation. In this paper, we represent the prior knowledge about the function optimum through a prior distribution. The prior distribution is then used to warp the search space in such a way that space gets expanded around the high probability region of function optimum and shrinks around low probability region of optimum.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-27T06:18:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.