The Adoption and Efficacy of Large Language Models: Evidence From Consumer Complaints in the Financial Industry
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.16466v3
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 09:29:11 GMT
- Title: The Adoption and Efficacy of Large Language Models: Evidence From Consumer Complaints in the Financial Industry
- Authors: Minkyu Shin, Jin Kim, Jiwoong Shin,
- Abstract summary: This research explores the effect of Large Language Models (LLMs) on consumer complaints submitted to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau from 2015 to 2024.
We analyzed over 1 million complaints and identified a significant increase in LLM usage following the release of ChatGPT.
Our findings suggest that facilitating access to LLMs can help firms better understand consumer concerns and level the playing field among consumers.
- Score: 2.300664273021602
- License:
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are reshaping consumer decision-making, particularly in communication with firms, yet our understanding of their impact remains limited. This research explores the effect of LLMs on consumer complaints submitted to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau from 2015 to 2024, documenting the adoption of LLMs for drafting complaints and evaluating the likelihood of obtaining relief from financial firms. Utilizing a leading AI detection tool, we analyzed over 1 million complaints and identified a significant increase in LLM usage following the release of ChatGPT. We establish a causal relationship between LLM usage and an increased likelihood of obtaining relief by employing instrumental variables to address endogeneity in LLM adoption. Experimental data further support this link, demonstrating that LLMs enhance the clarity and persuasiveness of consumer narratives. Our findings suggest that facilitating access to LLMs can help firms better understand consumer concerns and level the playing field among consumers. This underscores the importance of policies promoting technological accessibility, enabling all consumers to effectively voice their concerns.
Related papers
- Fostering Appropriate Reliance on Large Language Models: The Role of Explanations, Sources, and Inconsistencies [66.30619782227173]
Large language models (LLMs) can produce erroneous responses that sound fluent and convincing.
We identify several features of LLM responses that shape users' reliance.
We find that explanations increase reliance on both correct and incorrect responses.
We observe less reliance on incorrect responses when sources are provided or when explanations exhibit inconsistencies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-12T16:35:41Z) - A Survey on Responsible LLMs: Inherent Risk, Malicious Use, and Mitigation Strategy [31.839815402460918]
Large language models (LLMs) present significant potential for supporting numerous real-world applications.
They still face significant challenges in terms of the inherent risk of privacy leakage, hallucinated outputs, and value misalignment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-16T09:59:45Z) - Persuasion with Large Language Models: a Survey [49.86930318312291]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have created new disruptive possibilities for persuasive communication.
In areas such as politics, marketing, public health, e-commerce, and charitable giving, such LLM Systems have already achieved human-level or even super-human persuasiveness.
Our survey suggests that the current and future potential of LLM-based persuasion poses profound ethical and societal risks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-11T10:05:52Z) - CLAMBER: A Benchmark of Identifying and Clarifying Ambiguous Information Needs in Large Language Models [60.59638232596912]
We introduce CLAMBER, a benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs)
Building upon the taxonomy, we construct 12K high-quality data to assess the strengths, weaknesses, and potential risks of various off-the-shelf LLMs.
Our findings indicate the limited practical utility of current LLMs in identifying and clarifying ambiguous user queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-20T14:34:01Z) - "I'm Not Sure, But...": Examining the Impact of Large Language Models' Uncertainty Expression on User Reliance and Trust [51.542856739181474]
We show how different natural language expressions of uncertainty impact participants' reliance, trust, and overall task performance.
We find that first-person expressions decrease participants' confidence in the system and tendency to agree with the system's answers, while increasing participants' accuracy.
Our findings suggest that using natural language expressions of uncertainty may be an effective approach for reducing overreliance on LLMs, but that the precise language used matters.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-01T16:43:55Z) - Explaining Large Language Models Decisions Using Shapley Values [1.223779595809275]
Large language models (LLMs) have opened up exciting possibilities for simulating human behavior and cognitive processes.
However, the validity of utilizing LLMs as stand-ins for human subjects remains uncertain.
This paper presents a novel approach based on Shapley values to interpret LLM behavior and quantify the relative contribution of each prompt component to the model's output.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-29T22:49:43Z) - Prevalence and prevention of large language model use in crowd work [11.554258761785512]
We show that the use of large language models (LLMs) is prevalent among crowd workers.
We show that targeted mitigation strategies can significantly reduce, but not eliminate, LLM use.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-24T09:52:09Z) - Survey on Factuality in Large Language Models: Knowledge, Retrieval and
Domain-Specificity [61.54815512469125]
This survey addresses the crucial issue of factuality in Large Language Models (LLMs)
As LLMs find applications across diverse domains, the reliability and accuracy of their outputs become vital.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-11T14:18:03Z) - Enhancing Financial Sentiment Analysis via Retrieval Augmented Large
Language Models [11.154814189699735]
Large Language Models (LLMs) pre-trained on extensive corpora have demonstrated superior performance across various NLP tasks.
We introduce a retrieval-augmented LLMs framework for financial sentiment analysis.
Our approach achieves 15% to 48% performance gain in accuracy and F1 score.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-06T05:40:23Z) - On the Risk of Misinformation Pollution with Large Language Models [127.1107824751703]
We investigate the potential misuse of modern Large Language Models (LLMs) for generating credible-sounding misinformation.
Our study reveals that LLMs can act as effective misinformation generators, leading to a significant degradation in the performance of Open-Domain Question Answering (ODQA) systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-23T04:10:26Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.