Deepfakes, Misinformation, and Disinformation in the Era of Frontier AI, Generative AI, and Large AI Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.17394v1
• Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 06:47:58 GMT
• Title: Deepfakes, Misinformation, and Disinformation in the Era of Frontier AI, Generative AI, and Large AI Models
• Authors: Mohamed R. Shoaib, Zefan Wang, Milad Taleby Ahvanooey, Jun Zhao,
• Abstract summary: Deepfakes and the spread of m/disinformation have emerged as formidable threats to the integrity of information ecosystems worldwide. We highlight the mechanisms through which generative AI based on large models (LM-based GenAI) craft seemingly convincing yet fabricated contents. We introduce an integrated framework that combines advanced detection algorithms, cross-platform collaboration, and policy-driven initiatives.
• Score: 7.835719708227145
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: With the advent of sophisticated artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, the proliferation of deepfakes and the spread of m/disinformation have emerged as formidable threats to the integrity of information ecosystems worldwide. This paper provides an overview of the current literature. Within the frontier AI's crucial application in developing defense mechanisms for detecting deepfakes, we highlight the mechanisms through which generative AI based on large models (LM-based GenAI) craft seemingly convincing yet fabricated contents. We explore the multifaceted implications of LM-based GenAI on society, politics, and individual privacy violations, underscoring the urgent need for robust defense strategies. To address these challenges, in this study, we introduce an integrated framework that combines advanced detection algorithms, cross-platform collaboration, and policy-driven initiatives to mitigate the risks associated with AI-Generated Content (AIGC). By leveraging multi-modal analysis, digital watermarking, and machine learning-based authentication techniques, we propose a defense mechanism adaptable to AI capabilities of ever-evolving nature. Furthermore, the paper advocates for a global consensus on the ethical usage of GenAI and implementing cyber-wellness educational programs to enhance public awareness and resilience against m/disinformation. Our findings suggest that a proactive and collaborative approach involving technological innovation and regulatory oversight is essential for safeguarding netizens while interacting with cyberspace against the insidious effects of deepfakes and GenAI-enabled m/disinformation campaigns.

Related papers

• Computational Safety for Generative AI: A Signal Processing Perspective [65.268245109828]
  computational safety is a mathematical framework that enables the quantitative assessment, formulation, and study of safety challenges in GenAI. We show how sensitivity analysis and loss landscape analysis can be used to detect malicious prompts with jailbreak attempts. We discuss key open research challenges, opportunities, and the essential role of signal processing in computational AI safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T02:26:50Z)
• SoK: Watermarking for AI-Generated Content [112.9218881276487]
  Watermarking schemes embed hidden signals within AI-generated content to enable reliable detection. Watermarks can play a crucial role in enhancing AI safety and trustworthiness by combating misinformation and deception. This work aims to guide researchers in advancing watermarking methods and applications, and support policymakers in addressing the broader implications of GenAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-27T16:22:33Z)
• Artificial Intelligence as the New Hacker: Developing Agents for Offensive Security [0.0]
  This paper explores the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into offensive cybersecurity. It develops an autonomous AI agent, ReaperAI, designed to simulate and execute cyberattacks. ReaperAI demonstrates the potential to identify, exploit, and analyze security vulnerabilities autonomously.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T18:15:12Z)
• Position Paper: Agent AI Towards a Holistic Intelligence [53.35971598180146]
  We emphasize developing Agent AI -- an embodied system that integrates large foundation models into agent actions. In this paper, we propose a novel large action model to achieve embodied intelligent behavior, the Agent Foundation Model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T16:09:56Z)
• Autonomous Threat Hunting: A Future Paradigm for AI-Driven Threat Intelligence [0.0]
  Review explores the amalgamation of artificial intelligence (AI) and traditional threat intelligence methodologies. Examines the transformative influence of AI and machine learning on conventional threat intelligence practices. Case studies and evaluations highlight success stories and lessons learned by organizations adopting AI-driven threat intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-30T17:36:08Z)
• Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
  We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems. There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them. Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z)
• Digital Deception: Generative Artificial Intelligence in Social Engineering and Phishing [7.1795069620810805]
  This paper investigates the transformative role of Generative AI in Social Engineering (SE) attacks. We use a theory of social engineering to identify three pillars where Generative AI amplifies the impact of SE attacks. Our study aims to foster a deeper understanding of the risks, human implications, and countermeasures associated with this emerging paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-15T07:55:59Z)
• Decoding the Threat Landscape : ChatGPT, FraudGPT, and WormGPT in Social Engineering Attacks [0.0]
  Generative AI models have revolutionized the field of cyberattacks, empowering malicious actors to craft convincing and personalized phishing lures. These models, ChatGPT, FraudGPT, and WormGPT, have augmented existing threats and ushered in new dimensions of risk. To counter these threats, we outline a range of strategies, including traditional security measures, AI-powered security solutions, and collaborative approaches in cybersecurity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T10:31:04Z)
• Impacts and Risk of Generative AI Technology on Cyber Defense [0.0]
  We propose leveraging the Cyber Kill Chain (CKC) to understand the lifecycle of cyberattacks. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the risk areas introduced by the offensive use of GenAI techniques. We also analyze the strategies employed by threat actors, highlighting the implications for cyber defense.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-22T16:51:41Z)
• Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space [62.997667081978825]
  Counterfactual explanations aim to provide to end users a set of features that need to be changed in order to achieve a desired outcome. Current approaches rarely take into account the feasibility of actions needed to achieve the proposed explanations. We present Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space (CEILS), a methodology to generate counterfactual explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T20:48:48Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.