Autonomous Threat Hunting: A Future Paradigm for AI-Driven Threat Intelligence
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.00286v1
- Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2023 17:36:08 GMT
- Title: Autonomous Threat Hunting: A Future Paradigm for AI-Driven Threat Intelligence
- Authors: Siva Raja Sindiramutty,
- Abstract summary: Review explores the amalgamation of artificial intelligence (AI) and traditional threat intelligence methodologies.
Examines the transformative influence of AI and machine learning on conventional threat intelligence practices.
Case studies and evaluations highlight success stories and lessons learned by organizations adopting AI-driven threat intelligence.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The evolution of cybersecurity has spurred the emergence of autonomous threat hunting as a pivotal paradigm in the realm of AI-driven threat intelligence. This review navigates through the intricate landscape of autonomous threat hunting, exploring its significance and pivotal role in fortifying cyber defense mechanisms. Delving into the amalgamation of artificial intelligence (AI) and traditional threat intelligence methodologies, this paper delineates the necessity and evolution of autonomous approaches in combating contemporary cyber threats. Through a comprehensive exploration of foundational AI-driven threat intelligence, the review accentuates the transformative influence of AI and machine learning on conventional threat intelligence practices. It elucidates the conceptual framework underpinning autonomous threat hunting, spotlighting its components, and the seamless integration of AI algorithms within threat hunting processes.. Insightful discussions on challenges encompassing scalability, interpretability, and ethical considerations in AI-driven models enrich the discourse. Moreover, through illuminating case studies and evaluations, this paper showcases real-world implementations, underscoring success stories and lessons learned by organizations adopting AI-driven threat intelligence. In conclusion, this review consolidates key insights, emphasizing the substantial implications of autonomous threat hunting for the future of cybersecurity. It underscores the significance of continual research and collaborative efforts in harnessing the potential of AI-driven approaches to fortify cyber defenses against evolving threats.
Related papers
- Attack Atlas: A Practitioner's Perspective on Challenges and Pitfalls in Red Teaming GenAI [52.138044013005]
generative AI, particularly large language models (LLMs), become increasingly integrated into production applications.
New attack surfaces and vulnerabilities emerge and put a focus on adversarial threats in natural language and multi-modal systems.
Red-teaming has gained importance in proactively identifying weaknesses in these systems, while blue-teaming works to protect against such adversarial attacks.
This work aims to bridge the gap between academic insights and practical security measures for the protection of generative AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-23T10:18:10Z) - The Shadow of Fraud: The Emerging Danger of AI-powered Social Engineering and its Possible Cure [30.431292911543103]
Social engineering (SE) attacks remain a significant threat to both individuals and organizations.
The advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has potentially intensified these threats by enabling more personalized and convincing attacks.
This survey paper categorizes SE attack mechanisms, analyzes their evolution, and explores methods for measuring these threats.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-22T17:37:31Z) - Artificial Intelligence as the New Hacker: Developing Agents for Offensive Security [0.0]
This paper explores the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into offensive cybersecurity.
It develops an autonomous AI agent, ReaperAI, designed to simulate and execute cyberattacks.
ReaperAI demonstrates the potential to identify, exploit, and analyze security vulnerabilities autonomously.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-09T18:15:12Z) - Asset-centric Threat Modeling for AI-based Systems [7.696807063718328]
This paper presents ThreatFinderAI, an approach and tool to model AI-related assets, threats, countermeasures, and quantify residual risks.
To evaluate the practicality of the approach, participants were tasked to recreate a threat model developed by cybersecurity experts of an AI-based healthcare platform.
Overall, the solution's usability was well-perceived and effectively supports threat identification and risk discussion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-11T08:40:01Z) - Position Paper: Agent AI Towards a Holistic Intelligence [53.35971598180146]
We emphasize developing Agent AI -- an embodied system that integrates large foundation models into agent actions.
In this paper, we propose a novel large action model to achieve embodied intelligent behavior, the Agent Foundation Model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-28T16:09:56Z) - Testing autonomous vehicles and AI: perspectives and challenges from cybersecurity, transparency, robustness and fairness [53.91018508439669]
The study explores the complexities of integrating Artificial Intelligence into Autonomous Vehicles (AVs)
It examines the challenges introduced by AI components and the impact on testing procedures.
The paper identifies significant challenges and suggests future directions for research and development of AI in AV technology.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-21T08:29:42Z) - Deepfakes, Misinformation, and Disinformation in the Era of Frontier AI, Generative AI, and Large AI Models [7.835719708227145]
Deepfakes and the spread of m/disinformation have emerged as formidable threats to the integrity of information ecosystems worldwide.
We highlight the mechanisms through which generative AI based on large models (LM-based GenAI) craft seemingly convincing yet fabricated contents.
We introduce an integrated framework that combines advanced detection algorithms, cross-platform collaboration, and policy-driven initiatives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-29T06:47:58Z) - Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems.
There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them.
Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z) - A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Cybersecurity [14.648580959079787]
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) aims to create machine learning models that can provide clear and interpretable explanations for their decisions and actions.
In the field of network cybersecurity, XAI has the potential to revolutionize the way we approach network security by enabling us to better understand the behavior of cyber threats.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-07T22:54:18Z) - AI Maintenance: A Robustness Perspective [91.28724422822003]
We introduce highlighted robustness challenges in the AI lifecycle and motivate AI maintenance by making analogies to car maintenance.
We propose an AI model inspection framework to detect and mitigate robustness risks.
Our proposal for AI maintenance facilitates robustness assessment, status tracking, risk scanning, model hardening, and regulation throughout the AI lifecycle.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-08T15:02:38Z) - An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive
qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence.
The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.