Investigating Collaborative Data Practices: a Case Study on Artificial Intelligence for Healthcare Research

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.18424v2
• Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 13:12:17 GMT
• Title: Investigating Collaborative Data Practices: a Case Study on Artificial Intelligence for Healthcare Research
• Authors: Rafael Henkin, Elizabeth Remfry, Duncan J. Reynolds, Megan Clinch, Michael R. Barnes
• Abstract summary: We look at the collaborative data practices of research consortia tasked with applying AI tools to understand and manage multiple long-term conditions in the UK. Our findings reveal the adaptation of tools that are used for sharing knowledge and the tailoring of information based on the audience. We identify meetings as the key setting for facilitating exchanges between disciplines and allowing for the blending and creation of knowledge.
• Score: 1.3178083420209858
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Developing artificial intelligence (AI) tools for healthcare is a collaborative effort, bringing data scientists, clinicians, patients and other disciplines together. In this paper, we explore the collaborative data practices of research consortia tasked with applying AI tools to understand and manage multiple long-term conditions in the UK. Through an inductive thematic analysis of 13 semi-structured interviews with participants of these consortia, we aimed to understand how collaboration happens based on the tools used, communication processes and settings, as well as the conditions and obstacles for collaborative work. Our findings reveal the adaptation of tools that are used for sharing knowledge and the tailoring of information based on the audience, particularly those from a clinical or patient perspective. Limitations on the ability to do this were also found to be imposed by the use of electronic healthcare records and access to datasets. We identified meetings as the key setting for facilitating exchanges between disciplines and allowing for the blending and creation of knowledge. Finally, we bring to light the conditions needed to facilitate collaboration and discuss how some of the challenges may be navigated in future work.

Related papers

• Demystifying Large Language Models for Medicine: A Primer [50.83806796466396]
  Large language models (LLMs) represent a transformative class of AI tools capable of revolutionizing various aspects of healthcare. This tutorial aims to equip healthcare professionals with the tools necessary to effectively integrate LLMs into clinical practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T15:41:56Z)
• Multimodal Fusion with LLMs for Engagement Prediction in Natural Conversation [70.52558242336988]
  We focus on predicting engagement in dyadic interactions by scrutinizing verbal and non-verbal cues, aiming to detect signs of disinterest or confusion. In this work, we collect a dataset featuring 34 participants engaged in casual dyadic conversations, each providing self-reported engagement ratings at the end of each conversation. We introduce a novel fusion strategy using Large Language Models (LLMs) to integrate multiple behavior modalities into a multimodal transcript''
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-13T18:28:12Z)
• Synthetic Patients: Simulating Difficult Conversations with Multimodal Generative AI for Medical Education [0.0]
  Effective patient-centered communication is a core competency for physicians. Both seasoned providers and medical trainees report decreased confidence in leading conversations on sensitive topics. We present a novel educational tool designed to facilitate interactive, real-time simulations of difficult conversations in a video-based format.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T11:02:08Z)
• Leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to Support Collaborative Human-AI Online Risk Data Annotation [0.22530496464901104]
  Collaborative human-AI labeling is a promising approach to annotating large-scale and complex data for various tasks. Yet, tools and methods to support effective human-AI collaboration for data annotation are under-studied. This gap is pertinent because co-labeling tasks need to support a two-way interactive discussion that can add nuance and context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T17:20:57Z)
• MedNgage: A Dataset for Understanding Engagement in Patient-Nurse Conversations [4.847266237348932]
  Patients who effectively manage their symptoms often demonstrate higher levels of engagement in conversations and interventions with healthcare practitioners. It is crucial for AI systems to understand the engagement in natural conversations between patients and practitioners to better contribute toward patient care. We present a novel dataset (MedNgage) which consists of patient-nurse conversations about cancer symptom management.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T16:06:07Z)
• CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Society [58.04479313658851]
  This paper explores the potential of building scalable techniques to facilitate autonomous cooperation among communicative agents. We propose a novel communicative agent framework named role-playing. Our contributions include introducing a novel communicative agent framework, offering a scalable approach for studying the cooperative behaviors and capabilities of multi-agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-31T01:09:00Z)
• Co-Located Human-Human Interaction Analysis using Nonverbal Cues: A Survey [71.43956423427397]
  We aim to identify the nonverbal cues and computational methodologies resulting in effective performance. This survey differs from its counterparts by involving the widest spectrum of social phenomena and interaction settings. Some major observations are: the most often used nonverbal cue, computational method, interaction environment, and sensing approach are speaking activity, support vector machines, and meetings composed of 3-4 persons equipped with microphones and cameras, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T13:37:57Z)
• Building Trust: Lessons from the Technion-Rambam Machine Learning in Healthcare Datathon Event [4.909656341561595]
  A datathon is a time-constrained competition involving data science applied to a specific problem. This work describes opportunities and limitations in medical data science in the Israeli context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-16T14:53:56Z)
• An NLP Solution to Foster the Use of Information in Electronic Health Records for Efficiency in Decision-Making in Hospital Care [0.26340862968426904]
  The project aimed to define the rules and develop a technological solution to automatically identify attributes within free-text clinical records written in Portuguese. The project's goal was achieved by a multidisciplinary team that included clinicians, epidemiologists, computational linguists, machine learning researchers and software engineers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-24T15:52:59Z)
• Human-Robot Collaboration and Machine Learning: A Systematic Review of Recent Research [69.48907856390834]
  Human-robot collaboration (HRC) is the approach that explores the interaction between a human and a robot. This paper proposes a thorough literature review of the use of machine learning techniques in the context of HRC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-14T15:14:33Z)
• MIMO: Mutual Integration of Patient Journey and Medical Ontology for Healthcare Representation Learning [49.57261599776167]
  We propose an end-to-end robust Transformer-based solution, Mutual Integration of patient journey and Medical Ontology (MIMO) for healthcare representation learning and predictive analytics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-20T07:04:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.