Understanding Opinions Towards Climate Change on Social Media

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.01217v1
• Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2023 20:02:34 GMT
• Title: Understanding Opinions Towards Climate Change on Social Media
• Authors: Yashaswi Pupneja, Joseph Zou, Sacha L\'evy, Shenyang Huang
• Abstract summary: We aim to understand how real world events influence the opinions of individuals towards climate change related topics on social media. We extracted and analyzed a dataset of 13.6 millions tweets sent by 3.6 million users from 2006 to 2019. Our work acts as a first step towards understanding the evolution of pro-climate change communities around COP events.
• Score: 2.31449645503075
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Social media platforms such as Twitter (now known as X) have revolutionized how the public engage with important societal and political topics. Recently, climate change discussions on social media became a catalyst for political polarization and the spreading of misinformation. In this work, we aim to understand how real world events influence the opinions of individuals towards climate change related topics on social media. To this end, we extracted and analyzed a dataset of 13.6 millions tweets sent by 3.6 million users from 2006 to 2019. Then, we construct a temporal graph from the user-user mentions network and utilize the Louvain community detection algorithm to analyze the changes in community structure around Conference of the Parties on Climate Change~(COP) events. Next, we also apply tools from the Natural Language Processing literature to perform sentiment analysis and topic modeling on the tweets. Our work acts as a first step towards understanding the evolution of pro-climate change communities around COP events. Answering these questions helps us understand how to raise people's awareness towards climate change thus hopefully calling on more individuals to join the collaborative effort in slowing down climate change.

Related papers

• ClimateNLP: Analyzing Public Sentiment Towards Climate Change Using Natural Language Processing [0.0]
  This paper employs natural language processing (NLP) techniques to analyze climate change discourse and quantify the sentiment of climate change-related tweets. The objective is to discern the sentiment individuals express and uncover patterns in public opinion concerning climate change.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T07:48:50Z)
• Analysis of Climate Campaigns on Social Media using Bayesian Model Averaging [29.413444722550356]
  We analyze how industries, their advocacy group, and climate advocacy group use social media to influence the narrative on climate change. We propose a minimally supervised model soup [57] approach combined with messaging themes to identify the stances of climate ads on Facebook.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-06T16:43:29Z)
• A Multi-task Model for Sentiment Aided Stance Detection of Climate Change Tweets [2.111703012534138]
  We propose a framework that helps identify denier statements on Twitter and thus classifies the stance of the tweet into one of the two attitudes towards climate change (denier/believer) We propose a multi-task framework that performs stance detection (primary task) and sentiment analysis (auxiliary task) simultaneously.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-07T13:19:44Z)
• Trend and Thoughts: Understanding Climate Change Concern using Machine Learning and Social Media Data [3.7384509727711923]
  We constructed a massive climate change Twitter dataset and conducted comprehensive analysis using machine learning. By conducting topic modeling and natural language processing, we show the relationship between the number of tweets about climate change and major climate events. Our dataset was published on Kaggle and can be used in further research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-06T19:59:03Z)
• Shifting Polarization and Twitter News Influencers between two U.S. Presidential Elections [92.33485580547801]
  We analyze the change of polarization between the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential elections. Most of the top influencers were affiliated with media organizations during both elections. 75% of the top influencers in 2020 were not present in 2016, demonstrating that such status is difficult to retain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-03T20:08:54Z)
• Machine learning reveals how personalized climate communication can both succeed and backfire [55.41644538483948]
  We show that online advertisements increase some people's belief in climate change while resulting in decreased belief in others. In particular, we show that the effect of the advertisements could change depending on people's age and ethnicity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-10T20:47:34Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Analyzing Sustainability Reports Using Natural Language Processing [68.8204255655161]
  In recent years, companies have increasingly been aiming to both mitigate their environmental impact and adapt to the changing climate context. This is reported via increasingly exhaustive reports, which cover many types of climate risks and exposures under the umbrella of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) We present this tool and the methodology that we used to develop it in the present article.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-03T21:22:42Z)
• You are right. I am ALARMED -- But by Climate Change Counter Movement [40.66864319982138]
  We revisit the literature on climate misinformation in social sciences and repackage it to introduce in the community of NLP. We try to bridge this gap by scraping and releasing articles with known climate change misinformation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-30T16:06:02Z)
• Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
  We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.