What is the disinformation problem? Reviewing the dominant paradigm and
motivating an alternative sociopolitical view
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.02011v1
- Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 16:34:31 GMT
- Title: What is the disinformation problem? Reviewing the dominant paradigm and
motivating an alternative sociopolitical view
- Authors: Nicholas Rabb
- Abstract summary: This article contributes to a growing field by reviewing prevalent U.S. disinformation discourse.
It analyzes cross-disciplinary discourse about the content, individual, group, and institutional layers of the problem.
It concludes by putting forth an alternative, sociopolitical paradigm that allows subjective models of the world to govern rationality.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Disinformation research has proliferated in reaction to widespread false,
problematic beliefs purported to explain major social phenomena. Yet while the
effects of disinformation are well-known, there is less consensus about its
causes; the research spans several disciplines, each focusing on different
pieces. This article contributes to this growing field by reviewing prevalent
U.S. disinformation discourse (academic writing, media, and corporate and
government narrative) and outlining the dominant understanding, or paradigm, of
the disinformation problem by analyzing cross-disciplinary discourse about the
content, individual, group, and institutional layers of the problem. The result
is an individualistic explanation largely blaming social media, malicious
individuals or nations, and irrational people. Yet this understanding has
shortcomings: notably, that its limited, individualistic views of truth and
rationality obscures the influence of oppressive ideologies and media or
domestic actors in creating flawed worldviews and spreading disinformation. The
article then concludes by putting forth an alternative, sociopolitical paradigm
that allows subjective models of the world to govern rationality and
information processing -- largely informed by social and group identity --
which are being formed and catered to by institutional actors (corporations,
media, political parties, and the government) to maintain or gain legitimacy
for their actions.
Related papers
- Understanding Divergent Framing of the Supreme Court Controversies:
Social Media vs. News Outlets [56.67097829383139]
We focus on the nuanced distinctions in framing of social media and traditional media outlets concerning a series of U.S. Supreme Court rulings.
We observe significant polarization in the news media's treatment of affirmative action and abortion rights, whereas the topic of student loans tends to exhibit a greater degree of consensus.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-18T06:40:21Z) - The Face of Populism: Examining Differences in Facial Emotional
Expressions of Political Leaders Using Machine Learning [57.70351255180495]
We apply a deep-learning-based computer-vision algorithm to a sample of 220 YouTube videos depicting political leaders from 15 different countries.
We observe statistically significant differences in the average score of expressed negative emotions between groups of leaders with varying degrees of populist rhetoric.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-19T18:32:49Z) - Bias or Diversity? Unraveling Fine-Grained Thematic Discrepancy in U.S.
News Headlines [63.52264764099532]
We use a large dataset of 1.8 million news headlines from major U.S. media outlets spanning from 2014 to 2022.
We quantify the fine-grained thematic discrepancy related to four prominent topics - domestic politics, economic issues, social issues, and foreign affairs.
Our findings indicate that on domestic politics and social issues, the discrepancy can be attributed to a certain degree of media bias.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-28T03:31:37Z) - Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases.
We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions.
Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z) - Adherence to Misinformation on Social Media Through Socio-Cognitive and
Group-Based Processes [79.79659145328856]
We argue that when misinformation proliferates, this happens because the social media environment enables adherence to misinformation.
We make the case that polarization and misinformation adherence are closely tied.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-30T12:34:24Z) - Opinion dynamics in social networks: From models to data [0.0]
Opinions shape collective action, playing a role in democratic processes, the evolution of norms, and cultural change.
For decades, researchers in the social and natural sciences have tried to describe how shifting individual perspectives and social exchange lead to archetypal states of public opinion like consensus and polarization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-04T19:21:26Z) - An Agenda for Disinformation Research [3.083055913556838]
Disinformation erodes trust in the socio-political institutions that are the fundamental fabric of democracy.
The distribution of false, misleading, or inaccurate information with the intent to deceive is an existential threat to the United States.
New tools and approaches must be developed to leverage these affordances to understand and address this growing challenge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-15T19:32:36Z) - Fighting the COVID-19 Infodemic in Social Media: A Holistic Perspective
and a Call to Arms [42.7332883578842]
With the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, people turned to social media to read and to share timely information.
There was also a new blending of medical and political misinformation and disinformation, which gave rise to the first global infodemic.
This is a complex problem that needs a holistic approach combining the perspectives of journalists, fact-checkers, policymakers, government entities, social media platforms, and society as a whole.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-15T21:18:30Z) - Analysis of misinformation during the COVID-19 outbreak in China:
cultural, social and political entanglements [6.256108383411306]
COVID-19 resulted in an infodemic, which could erode public trust, impede virus containment, and outlive the pandemic itself.
The evolving and fragmented media landscape is a key driver of the spread of misinformation.
Our findings shed light on the distinct characteristics of misinformation during the COVID-19 and offer insights into combating misinformation in China and across the world at large.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-21T01:34:08Z) - Mining Disinformation and Fake News: Concepts, Methods, and Recent
Advancements [55.33496599723126]
disinformation including fake news has become a global phenomenon due to its explosive growth.
Despite the recent progress in detecting disinformation and fake news, it is still non-trivial due to its complexity, diversity, multi-modality, and costs of fact-checking or annotation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-02T21:01:02Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.