Distributed Optimization with Feasible Set Privacy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.02112v1
• Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 18:45:04 GMT
• Title: Distributed Optimization with Feasible Set Privacy
• Authors: Shreya Meel, Sennur Ulukus,
• Abstract summary: Two agents learn the optimal solution set while keeping their feasible sets $mathcalP1$ and $mathcalP1$ private from each other. We adopt a sequential private information retrieval (SPIR) framework where one of the agents privately checks in $mathcalP$. We show that, compared to privately acquiring the feasible set $mathcalP1$ using an SPIR-based private set intersection (PSI) protocol, and finding the optimum, our scheme is better as it incurs less information leakage and less download
• Score: 35.16231062731263
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We consider the setup of a constrained optimization problem with two agents $E_1$ and $E_2$ who jointly wish to learn the optimal solution set while keeping their feasible sets $\mathcal{P}_1$ and $\mathcal{P}_2$ private from each other. The objective function $f$ is globally known and each feasible set is a collection of points from a global alphabet. We adopt a sequential symmetric private information retrieval (SPIR) framework where one of the agents (say $E_1$) privately checks in $\mathcal{P}_2$, the presence of candidate solutions of the problem constrained to $\mathcal{P}_1$ only, while learning no further information on $\mathcal{P}_2$ than the solution alone. Further, we extract an information theoretically private threshold PSI (ThPSI) protocol from our scheme and characterize its download cost. We show that, compared to privately acquiring the feasible set $\mathcal{P}_1\cap \mathcal{P}_2$ using an SPIR-based private set intersection (PSI) protocol, and finding the optimum, our scheme is better as it incurs less information leakage and less download cost than the former. Over all possible uniform mappings of $f$ to a fixed range of values, our scheme outperforms the former with a high probability.

Related papers

• Optimizing Leaky Private Information Retrieval Codes to Achieve ${O}(\log K)$ Leakage Ratio Exponent [8.60789551971052]
  We study the problem of leaky private information retrieval (L-PIR), where the amount of privacy leakage is measured by the pure differential privacy parameter. Unlike the previous L-PIR scheme proposed by Samy et al., which only adjusted the probability allocation to the clean (low-cost) retrieval pattern, we optimize the probabilities assigned to all the retrieval patterns jointly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-21T17:26:50Z)
• Optimized Tradeoffs for Private Prediction with Majority Ensembling [59.99331405291337]
  We introduce the Data-dependent Randomized Response Majority (DaRRM) algorithm. DaRRM is parameterized by a data-dependent noise function $gamma$, and enables efficient utility optimization over the class of all private algorithms. We show that DaRRM provably enjoys a privacy gain of a factor of 2 over common baselines, with fixed utility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-27T00:48:48Z)
• Optimal Bound for PCA with Outliers using Higher-Degree Voronoi Diagrams [0.0]
  We introduce new algorithms for Principal Component Analysis (PCA) with outliers. We navigate to the optimal subspace for PCA even in the presence of outliers. This approach achieves an optimal solution with a time complexity of $nd+mathcalO(1)textpoly(n,d)$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-13T13:05:36Z)
• Near Sample-Optimal Reduction-based Policy Learning for Average Reward MDP [58.13930707612128]
  This work considers the sample complexity of obtaining an $varepsilon$-optimal policy in an average reward Markov Decision Process (AMDP) We prove an upper bound of $widetilde O(H varepsilon-3 ln frac1delta)$ samples per state-action pair, where $H := sp(h*)$ is the span of bias of any optimal policy, $varepsilon$ is the accuracy and $delta$ is the failure probability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-01T15:57:58Z)
• Scalable Differentially Private Clustering via Hierarchically Separated Trees [82.69664595378869]
  We show that our method computes a solution with cost at most $O(d3/2log n)cdot OPT + O(k d2 log2 n / epsilon2)$, where $epsilon$ is the privacy guarantee. Although the worst-case guarantee is worse than that of state of the art private clustering methods, the algorithm we propose is practical.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-17T09:24:41Z)
• Single-Server Private Linear Transformation: The Joint Privacy Case [10.072633952908456]
  This paper introduces the problem of Private Linear Transformation (PLT) which generalizes the problems of private information retrieval and private linear computation. The problem includes one or more remote server(s) storing (identical copies of) $K$ messages and a user who wants to compute $L$ independent linear combinations of a $D$-subset of messages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T17:09:22Z)
• Private Stochastic Convex Optimization: Optimal Rates in $\ell_1$ Geometry [69.24618367447101]
  Up to logarithmic factors the optimal excess population loss of any $(varepsilon,delta)$-differently private is $sqrtlog(d)/n + sqrtd/varepsilon n.$ We show that when the loss functions satisfy additional smoothness assumptions, the excess loss is upper bounded (up to logarithmic factors) by $sqrtlog(d)/n + (log(d)/varepsilon n)2/3.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-02T06:53:44Z)
• Locally Private Hypothesis Selection [96.06118559817057]
  We output a distribution from $mathcalQ$ whose total variation distance to $p$ is comparable to the best such distribution. We show that the constraint of local differential privacy incurs an exponential increase in cost. Our algorithms result in exponential improvements on the round complexity of previous methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-21T18:30:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.