Hot PATE: Private Aggregation of Distributions for Diverse Task
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.02132v3
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 08:09:21 GMT
- Title: Hot PATE: Private Aggregation of Distributions for Diverse Task
- Abstract summary: We propose Hot PATE, a variant tailored to settings where outputs are distributions.<n>We define what it means to preserve diversity and introduce an efficient aggregation mechanism that transfers diversity to the randomized output without incurring additional privacy cost.<n> Empirically, Hot PATE achieves orders-of-magnitude improvement on in-context learning tasks.
- Score: 25.71922346848019
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The Private Aggregation of Teacher Ensembles (PATE) framework enables privacy-preserving machine learning by aggregating responses from disjoint subsets of sensitive data. Adaptations of PATE to tasks with inherent output diversity such as text generation face a core tension: preserving output diversity reduces teacher agreement, which in turn increases the noise required for differential privacy, degrading utility. Yet suppressing diversity is counterproductive, as modern large language models encapsulate knowledge in their output distributions. We propose Hot PATE, a variant tailored to settings where outputs are distributions. We formally define what it means to preserve diversity and introduce an efficient aggregation mechanism that transfers diversity to the randomized output without incurring additional privacy cost. Our method can be implemented with only API access to proprietary models and serves as a drop-in replacement for existing "cold" PATE aggregators. Empirically, Hot PATE achieves orders-of-magnitude improvement on in-context learning tasks.
Related papers
- Exposing Diversity Bias in Deep Generative Models: Statistical Origins and Correction of Diversity Error [19.594704501292778]
We compare the diversity of samples generated by state-of-the-art models with that of test samples drawn from the target data distribution.<n>We find that test data consistently attains substantially higher Vendi and RKE diversity scores than the generated samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-16T12:15:34Z) - Embedding-Based Federated Data Sharing via Differentially Private Conditional VAEs [0.13108652488669734]
Federated Learning (FL) enables decentralized training but suffers from high communication costs.<n>We propose a data-sharing method via Differentially Private (DP) generative models.<n>Clients collaboratively train a Differentially Private Conditional Variational Autoencoder (DP-CVAE) to model a global, privacy-aware data distribution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-03T14:36:15Z) - Machine Learning with Privacy for Protected Attributes [56.44253915927481]
We refine the definition of differential privacy (DP) to create a more general and flexible framework that we call feature differential privacy (FDP)<n>Our definition is simulation-based and allows for both addition/removal and replacement variants of privacy, and can handle arbitrary separation of protected and non-protected features.<n>We apply our framework to various machine learning tasks and show that it can significantly improve the utility of DP-trained models when public features are available.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-24T17:53:28Z) - Privacy-preserving Prompt Personalization in Federated Learning for Multimodal Large Language Models [12.406403248205285]
Federated prompt personalization (FPP) is developed to address data heterogeneity and local overfitting.<n>We propose SecFPP, a secure FPP protocol harmonizing personalization, and privacy guarantees.<n>We show SecFPP significantly outperforms both non-private and privacy-preserving baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-28T15:09:56Z) - FedCTTA: A Collaborative Approach to Continual Test-Time Adaptation in Federated Learning [0.956984177686999]
Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across distributed clients without sharing raw data.<n>FL models often suffer performance degradation due to distribution shifts between training and deployment.<n>We propose Federated Continual Test-Time Adaptation (FedCTTA), a privacy-preserving and computationally efficient framework for federated adaptation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-19T18:29:51Z) - Bayesian Joint Additive Factor Models for Multiview Learning [7.254731344123118]
A motivating application arises in the context of precision medicine where multi-omics data are collected to correlate with clinical outcomes.<n>We propose a joint additive factor regression model (JAFAR) with a structured additive design, accounting for shared and view-specific components.<n>Prediction of time-to-labor onset from immunome, metabolome, and proteome data illustrates performance gains against state-of-the-art competitors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-02T15:35:45Z) - Incentives in Private Collaborative Machine Learning [56.84263918489519]
Collaborative machine learning involves training models on data from multiple parties.
We introduce differential privacy (DP) as an incentive.
We empirically demonstrate the effectiveness and practicality of our approach on synthetic and real-world datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-02T06:28:22Z) - Sentinel-Guided Zero-Shot Learning: A Collaborative Paradigm without Real Data Exposure [13.971962047728237]
SG-ZSL is designed to foster efficient collaboration without the need to exchange models or sensitive data.
It consists of a teacher model, a student model and a generator that links both model entities.
It consistently outperforms in ZSL and GZSL tasks, notably in the white-box protocol.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-14T13:12:49Z) - Mitigating Shortcut Learning with Diffusion Counterfactuals and Diverse Ensembles [104.60508550106618]
We propose DiffDiv, an ensemble diversification framework exploiting Diffusion Probabilistic Models (DPMs)<n>We show that DPMs can generate images with novel feature combinations, even when trained on samples displaying correlated input features.<n>We show that DPM-guided diversification is sufficient to remove dependence on shortcut cues, without a need for additional supervised signals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-23T15:47:33Z) - Bounded and Unbiased Composite Differential Privacy [25.427802467876248]
The objective of differential privacy (DP) is to protect privacy by producing an output distribution that is indistinguishable between two neighboring databases.
Existing solutions attempt to address this issue by employing post-processing or truncation techniques.
We propose a novel differentially private mechanism which uses a composite probability density function to generate bounded and unbiased outputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-04T04:43:47Z) - On the Fairness Impacts of Private Ensembles Models [44.15285550981899]
Private Aggregation of Teacher Ensembles (PATE) is a machine learning framework that enables the creation of private models.
This paper explores whether the use of PATE can result in unfairness, and demonstrates that it can lead to accuracy disparities among groups of individuals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-19T16:43:53Z) - Source-free Domain Adaptation Requires Penalized Diversity [60.04618512479438]
Source-free domain adaptation (SFDA) was introduced to address knowledge transfer between different domains in the absence of source data.
In unsupervised SFDA, the diversity is limited to learning a single hypothesis on the source or learning multiple hypotheses with a shared feature extractor.
We propose a novel unsupervised SFDA algorithm that promotes representational diversity through the use of separate feature extractors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-06T00:20:19Z) - Selective Knowledge Sharing for Privacy-Preserving Federated
Distillation without A Good Teacher [52.2926020848095]
Federated learning is vulnerable to white-box attacks and struggles to adapt to heterogeneous clients.
This paper proposes a selective knowledge sharing mechanism for FD, termed Selective-FD.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-04T12:04:19Z) - Client-specific Property Inference against Secure Aggregation in
Federated Learning [52.8564467292226]
Federated learning has become a widely used paradigm for collaboratively training a common model among different participants.
Many attacks have shown that it is still possible to infer sensitive information such as membership, property, or outright reconstruction of participant data.
We show that simple linear models can effectively capture client-specific properties only from the aggregated model updates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-07T14:11:01Z) - Breaking the Spurious Causality of Conditional Generation via Fairness
Intervention with Corrective Sampling [77.15766509677348]
Conditional generative models often inherit spurious correlations from the training dataset.
This can result in label-conditional distributions that are imbalanced with respect to another latent attribute.
We propose a general two-step strategy to mitigate this issue.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-05T08:09:33Z) - Private Semi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Noisy
Labels [21.374707481630697]
We propose PATE++, which combines the current advanced noisy label training mechanisms with the original PATE framework to enhance its accuracy.
A novel structure of Generative Adversarial Nets (GANs) is developed in order to integrate them effectively.
In addition, we develop a novel noisy label detection mechanism for semi-supervised model training to further improve student model performance when training with noisy labels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-03T07:33:49Z) - Faculty Distillation with Optimal Transport [53.69235109551099]
We propose to link teacher's task and student's task by optimal transport.
Based on the semantic relationship between their label spaces, we can bridge the support gap between output distributions.
Experiments under various settings demonstrate the succinctness and versatility of our method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-25T09:34:37Z) - SF-PATE: Scalable, Fair, and Private Aggregation of Teacher Ensembles [50.90773979394264]
This paper studies a model that protects the privacy of individuals' sensitive information while also allowing it to learn non-discriminatory predictors.
A key characteristic of the proposed model is to enable the adoption of off-the-selves and non-private fair models to create a privacy-preserving and fair model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-11T14:42:54Z) - Towards Differential Relational Privacy and its use in Question
Answering [109.4452196071872]
Memorization of relation between entities in a dataset can lead to privacy issues when using a trained question answering model.
We quantify this phenomenon and provide a possible definition of Differential Privacy (DPRP)
We illustrate concepts in experiments with largescale models for Question Answering.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-30T22:59:24Z) - A Fairness Analysis on Private Aggregation of Teacher Ensembles [31.388212637482365]
The Private Aggregation of Teacher Ensembles (PATE) is an important private machine learning framework.
This paper asks whether this privacy-preserving framework introduces or exacerbates bias and unfairness.
It shows that PATE can introduce accuracy disparity among individuals and groups of individuals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-17T16:19:24Z) - PATE-AAE: Incorporating Adversarial Autoencoder into Private Aggregation
of Teacher Ensembles for Spoken Command Classification [53.764020085834645]
We propose an adversarial autoencoder (AAE) to replace generative adversarial network (GAN) in the private aggregation of teacher ensembles (PATE)
AAE architecture allows us to obtain good synthetic speechnative upon a discriminative training of latent vectors.
PATE-AAE improves the average classification accuracy by +$2.11%$ and +$6.60%$, respectively, when compared with alternative privacy-preserving solutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-02T23:10:57Z) - Optimal Off-Policy Evaluation from Multiple Logging Policies [77.62012545592233]
We study off-policy evaluation from multiple logging policies, each generating a dataset of fixed size, i.e., stratified sampling.
We find the OPE estimator for multiple loggers with minimum variance for any instance, i.e., the efficient one.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-21T13:43:48Z) - Bias and Variance of Post-processing in Differential Privacy [53.29035917495491]
Post-processing immunity is a fundamental property of differential privacy.
It is often argued that post-processing may introduce bias and increase variance.
This paper takes a first step towards understanding the properties of post-processing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-09T02:12:54Z) - Differentially Private Federated Learning with Laplacian Smoothing [72.85272874099644]
Federated learning aims to protect data privacy by collaboratively learning a model without sharing private data among users.
An adversary may still be able to infer the private training data by attacking the released model.
Differential privacy provides a statistical protection against such attacks at the price of significantly degrading the accuracy or utility of the trained models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-01T04:28:38Z) - Differentially Private Deep Learning with Smooth Sensitivity [144.31324628007403]
We study privacy concerns through the lens of differential privacy.
In this framework, privacy guarantees are generally obtained by perturbing models in such a way that specifics of data used to train the model are made ambiguous.
One of the most important techniques used in previous works involves an ensemble of teacher models, which return information to a student based on a noisy voting procedure.
In this work, we propose a novel voting mechanism with smooth sensitivity, which we call Immutable Noisy ArgMax, that, under certain conditions, can bear very large random noising from the teacher without affecting the useful information transferred to the student
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-01T15:38:00Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.