A Review of Cooperation in Multi-agent Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.05162v1
• Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 16:42:15 GMT
• Title: A Review of Cooperation in Multi-agent Learning
• Authors: Yali Du, Joel Z. Leibo, Usman Islam, Richard Willis, Peter Sunehag
• Abstract summary: Cooperation in multi-agent learning (MAL) is a topic at the intersection of numerous disciplines. This paper provides an overview of the fundamental concepts, problem settings and algorithms of multi-agent learning.
• Score: 5.334450724000142
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Cooperation in multi-agent learning (MAL) is a topic at the intersection of numerous disciplines, including game theory, economics, social sciences, and evolutionary biology. Research in this area aims to understand both how agents can coordinate effectively when goals are aligned and how they may cooperate in settings where gains from working together are possible but possibilities for conflict abound. In this paper we provide an overview of the fundamental concepts, problem settings and algorithms of multi-agent learning. This encompasses reinforcement learning, multi-agent sequential decision-making, challenges associated with multi-agent cooperation, and a comprehensive review of recent progress, along with an evaluation of relevant metrics. Finally we discuss open challenges in the field with the aim of inspiring new avenues for research.

Related papers

• Contextual Knowledge Sharing in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Decentralized Communication and Coordination [0.9776703963093367]
  Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (Dec-MARL) has emerged as a pivotal approach for addressing complex tasks in dynamic environments. This paper presents a novel Dec-MARL framework that integrates peer-to-peer communication and coordination, incorporating goal-awareness and time-awareness into the agents' knowledge-sharing processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-26T22:49:50Z)
• Multi-Agent Collaboration Mechanisms: A Survey of LLMs [6.545098975181273]
  Multi-Agent Systems (MASs) enable groups of intelligent agents to coordinate and solve complex tasks collectively. This work provides an extensive survey of the collaborative aspect of MASs and introduces a framework to guide future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-10T19:56:50Z)
• Multi-agent cooperation through learning-aware policy gradients [53.63948041506278]
  Self-interested individuals often fail to cooperate, posing a fundamental challenge for multi-agent learning. We present the first unbiased, higher-derivative-free policy gradient algorithm for learning-aware reinforcement learning. We derive from the iterated prisoner's dilemma a novel explanation for how and when cooperation arises among self-interested learning-aware agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T10:48:42Z)
• Multi-Agent Consensus Seeking via Large Language Models [6.336670103502898]
  Multi-agent systems driven by large language models (LLMs) have shown promising abilities for solving complex tasks in a collaborative manner. This work considers a fundamental problem in multi-agent collaboration: consensus seeking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T03:37:11Z)
• Cooperation, Competition, and Maliciousness: LLM-Stakeholders Interactive Negotiation [52.930183136111864]
  We propose using scorable negotiation to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) To reach an agreement, agents must have strong arithmetic, inference, exploration, and planning capabilities. We provide procedures to create new games and increase games' difficulty to have an evolving benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T13:33:06Z)
• Learning Reward Machines in Cooperative Multi-Agent Tasks [75.79805204646428]
  This paper presents a novel approach to Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) It combines cooperative task decomposition with the learning of reward machines (RMs) encoding the structure of the sub-tasks. The proposed method helps deal with the non-Markovian nature of the rewards in partially observable environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-24T15:12:28Z)
• Policy Diagnosis via Measuring Role Diversity in Cooperative Multi-agent RL [107.58821842920393]
  We quantify the agent's behavior difference and build its relationship with the policy performance via bf Role Diversity We find that the error bound in MARL can be decomposed into three parts that have a strong relation to the role diversity. The decomposed factors can significantly impact policy optimization on three popular directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T04:58:52Z)
• Cooperative Exploration for Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning [127.4746863307944]
  We propose cooperative multi-agent exploration (CMAE) for deep reinforcement learning. The goal is selected from multiple projected state spaces via a normalized entropy-based technique. We demonstrate that CMAE consistently outperforms baselines on various tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-23T20:06:32Z)
• Multiagent Deep Reinforcement Learning: Challenges and Directions Towards Human-Like Approaches [0.0]
  We present the most common multiagent problem representations and their main challenges. We identify five research areas that address one or more of these challenges. We suggest that, for multiagent reinforcement learning to be successful, future research addresses these challenges with an interdisciplinary approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-29T19:53:15Z)
• UneVEn: Universal Value Exploration for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [53.73686229912562]
  We propose a novel MARL approach called Universal Value Exploration (UneVEn) UneVEn learns a set of related tasks simultaneously with a linear decomposition of universal successor features. Empirical results on a set of exploration games, challenging cooperative predator-prey tasks requiring significant coordination among agents, and StarCraft II micromanagement benchmarks show that UneVEn can solve tasks where other state-of-the-art MARL methods fail.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-06T19:08:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.