A dynamical clipping approach with task feedback for Proximal Policy Optimization
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.07624v3
- Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2024 06:51:56 GMT
- Title: A dynamical clipping approach with task feedback for Proximal Policy Optimization
- Abstract summary: There is no theoretical proof that the optimal PPO clipping bound remains consistent throughout the entire training process.
Past studies have aimed to dynamically adjust PPO clipping bound to enhance PPO's performance.
We propose Preference based Proximal Policy Optimization (Pb-PPO) to better reflect the preference (maximizing Return) of reinforcement learning tasks.
- Score: 29.855219523565786
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) has been broadly applied to robotics learning, showcasing stable training performance. However, the fixed clipping bound setting may limit the performance of PPO. Specifically, there is no theoretical proof that the optimal clipping bound remains consistent throughout the entire training process. Meanwhile, previous researches suggest that a fixed clipping bound restricts the policy's ability to explore. Therefore, many past studies have aimed to dynamically adjust the PPO clipping bound to enhance PPO's performance. However, the objective of these approaches are not directly aligned with the objective of reinforcement learning (RL) tasks, which is to maximize the cumulative Return. Unlike previous clipping approaches, we propose a bi-level proximal policy optimization objective that can dynamically adjust the clipping bound to better reflect the preference (maximizing Return) of these RL tasks. Based on this bi-level proximal policy optimization paradigm, we introduce a new algorithm named Preference based Proximal Policy Optimization (Pb-PPO). Pb-PPO utilizes a multi-armed bandit approach to refelect RL preference, recommending the clipping bound for PPO that can maximizes the current Return. Therefore, Pb-PPO results in greater stability and improved performance compared to PPO with a fixed clipping bound. We test Pb-PPO on locomotion benchmarks across multiple environments, including Gym-Mujoco and legged-gym. Additionally, we validate Pb-PPO on customized navigation tasks. Meanwhile, we conducted comparisons with PPO using various fixed clipping bounds and various of clipping approaches. The experimental results indicate that Pb-PPO demonstrates superior training performance compared to PPO and its variants. Our codebase has been released at : https://github.com/stevezhangzA/pb_ppo
Related papers
- TOPPO: Rethinking PPO for Multi-Task Reinforcement Learning with Critic Balancing [1.9552387050709823]
We propose TOPPO, a set of modules that improve gradient conditioning and balance learning dynamics across tasks.<n> TOPPO achieves stronger mean and tail-task performance than published SAC-family and ARS-family baselines.<n>Our results demonstrate that, with proper optimization, on-policy methods can rival or exceed off-policy approaches in MTRL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-12T03:40:28Z) - Bounded Ratio Reinforcement Learning [62.09379476369526]
This paper introduces the Bounded Ratio Reinforcement Learning (BRRL) framework to solve on-policy reinforcement learning problems.<n>We develop a policy optimization algorithm called Bounded Policy Optimization (BPO) that minimizes an advantage-weighted divergence between the policy and the analytic optimal solution from BRRL.<n> Notably, our framework also provides a new theoretical lens to interpret the success of the PPO loss, and connects trust region policy optimization and the Cross-Entropy Method (CEM).
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-20T17:59:01Z) - Proximal Policy Optimization in Path Space: A Schrödinger Bridge Perspective [41.829130841650326]
We propose GSB-PPO, a path-space formulation of generative PPO inspired by the Generalized Schrdinger Bridge (GSB)<n>Within this framework, we develop two concrete objectives: a clipping-based objective, GSB-PPO-Clip, and a penalty-based objective, GSB-PPO-Penalty.<n>Our results highlight path-space proximal regularization as an effective principle for training generative policies with PPO.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-23T06:37:42Z) - ExO-PPO: an Extended Off-policy Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithm [2.6813717321945103]
We propose a new PPO variant based on the stability guarantee from conservative on-policy iteration with a more efficient off-policy data utilization.<n>Compared with PPO and some other state-of-the-art variants, we demonstrate an improved performance of ExO-PPO with balanced sample efficiency and stability on varied tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-10T12:29:57Z) - Rethinking the Trust Region in LLM Reinforcement Learning [72.25890308541334]
Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) serves as the de facto standard algorithm for Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose Divergence Proximal Policy Optimization (DPPO), which substitutes clipping with a more principled constraint.<n>DPPO achieves superior training and efficiency compared to existing methods, offering a more robust foundation for RL-based fine-tuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-04T18:59:04Z) - Coverage Improvement and Fast Convergence of On-policy Preference Learning [67.36750525893514]
Online on-policy preference learning algorithms for language model alignment can significantly outperform their offline counterparts.<n>We analyze how the sampling policy's coverage evolves throughout on-policy training.<n>We develop principled on-policy schemes for reward distillation in the general function class setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-13T10:46:06Z) - GDPO: Group reward-Decoupled Normalization Policy Optimization for Multi-reward RL Optimization [133.27496265096445]
We show how to apply Group Relative Policy Optimization under multi-reward setting without examining its suitability.<n>We then introduce Group reward-Decoupled Normalization Policy Optimization (GDPO), a new policy optimization method to resolve these issues.<n>GDPO consistently outperforms GRPO, demonstrating its effectiveness and generalizability for multi-reward reinforcement learning optimization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-08T18:59:24Z) - Accelerating RL for LLM Reasoning with Optimal Advantage Regression [52.0792918455501]
We propose a novel two-stage policy optimization framework that directly approximates the optimal advantage function.<n>$A$*-PO achieves competitive performance across a wide range of mathematical reasoning benchmarks.<n>It reduces training time by up to 2$times$ and peak memory usage by over 30% compared to PPO, GRPO, and REBEL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-27T03:58:50Z) - CPPO: Accelerating the Training of Group Relative Policy Optimization-Based Reasoning Models [68.26281707780761]
This paper introduces Completion Pruning Policy Optimization (CPPO) to accelerate the training of reasoning models.
We show that CPPO achieves up to $8.32times$ speedup on GSM8K and $3.51times$ on Math while preserving or even enhancing the accuracy compared to the original GRPO.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-28T11:30:05Z) - Beyond the Boundaries of Proximal Policy Optimization [17.577317574595206]
This work offers an alternative perspective of PPO, in which it is decomposed into the inner-loop estimation of update vectors.
We propose outer proximal policy optimization (outer-PPO); a framework wherein these update vectors are applied using an arbitrary gradient-based gradient.
Methods are evaluated against an aggressively tuned PPO baseline on Brax, Jumanji and MinAtar environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-01T15:29:10Z) - Accelerated Preference Optimization for Large Language Model Alignment [60.22606527763201]
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has emerged as a pivotal tool for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences.
Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) formulates RLHF as a policy optimization problem without explicitly estimating the reward function.
We propose a general Accelerated Preference Optimization (APO) framework, which unifies many existing preference optimization algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-08T18:51:01Z) - REBEL: Reinforcement Learning via Regressing Relative Rewards [59.68420022466047]
We propose REBEL, a minimalist RL algorithm for the era of generative models.
In theory, we prove that fundamental RL algorithms like Natural Policy Gradient can be seen as variants of REBEL.
We find that REBEL provides a unified approach to language modeling and image generation with stronger or similar performance as PPO and DPO.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-25T17:20:45Z) - Clipped-Objective Policy Gradients for Pessimistic Policy Optimization [3.2996723916635275]
Policy gradient methods seek to produce monotonic improvement through bounded changes in policy outputs.
In this work, we find that the performance of PPO, when applied to continuous action spaces, may be consistently improved through a simple change in objective.
We show that the clipped-objective policy gradient (COPG) objective is on average "pessimistic" compared to both the PPO objective and (2) this pessimism promotes enhanced exploration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-10T03:02:49Z) - Diverse Policy Optimization for Structured Action Space [59.361076277997704]
We propose Diverse Policy Optimization (DPO) to model the policies in structured action space as the energy-based models (EBM)
A novel and powerful generative model, GFlowNet, is introduced as the efficient, diverse EBM-based policy sampler.
Experiments on ATSC and Battle benchmarks demonstrate that DPO can efficiently discover surprisingly diverse policies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-23T10:48:09Z) - You May Not Need Ratio Clipping in PPO [117.03368180633463]
Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) methods learn a policy by iteratively performing multiple mini-batch optimization epochs of a surrogate objective with one set of sampled data.
Ratio clipping PPO is a popular variant that clips the probability ratios between the target policy and the policy used to collect samples.
We show in this paper that such ratio clipping may not be a good option as it can fail to effectively bound the ratios.
We show that ESPO can be easily scaled up to distributed training with many workers, delivering strong performance as well.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-31T20:26:56Z) - Hinge Policy Optimization: Rethinking Policy Improvement and
Reinterpreting PPO [6.33198867705718]
Policy optimization is a fundamental principle for designing reinforcement learning algorithms.
Despite its superior empirical performance, PPO-clip has not been justified via theoretical proof up to date.
This is the first ever that can prove global convergence to an optimal policy for a variant of PPO-clip.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-26T15:56:57Z) - Proximal Policy Optimization Smoothed Algorithm [0.0]
We present a PPO variant, named Proximal Policy Optimization Smooth Algorithm (PPOS)
Its critical improvement is the use of a functional clipping method instead of a flat clipping method.
We show that it outperforms the latest PPO variants on both performance and stability in challenging continuous control tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-04T07:43:50Z) - Iterative Amortized Policy Optimization [147.63129234446197]
Policy networks are a central feature of deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms for continuous control.
From the variational inference perspective, policy networks are a form of textitamortized optimization, optimizing network parameters rather than the policy distributions directly.
We demonstrate that iterative amortized policy optimization, yields performance improvements over direct amortization on benchmark continuous control tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-20T23:25:42Z) - Provably Efficient Exploration in Policy Optimization [117.09887790160406]
This paper proposes an Optimistic variant of the Proximal Policy Optimization algorithm (OPPO)
OPPO achieves $tildeO(sqrtd2 H3 T )$ regret.
To the best of our knowledge, OPPO is the first provably efficient policy optimization algorithm that explores.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2019-12-12T08:40:02Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.