Dissecting vocabulary biases datasets through statistical testing and automated data augmentation for artifact mitigation in Natural Language Inference

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.08747v1
• Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 08:46:26 GMT
• Title: Dissecting vocabulary biases datasets through statistical testing and automated data augmentation for artifact mitigation in Natural Language Inference
• Authors: Dat Thanh Nguyen
• Abstract summary: We focus on investigating dataset artifacts and developing strategies to address these issues. We propose several automatic data augmentation strategies spanning character to word levels. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed approaches effectively enhance model accuracy and reduce biases by up to 0.66% and 1.14%, respectively.
• Score: 3.154631846975021
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In recent years, the availability of large-scale annotated datasets, such as the Stanford Natural Language Inference and the Multi-Genre Natural Language Inference, coupled with the advent of pre-trained language models, has significantly contributed to the development of the natural language inference domain. However, these crowdsourced annotated datasets often contain biases or dataset artifacts, leading to overestimated model performance and poor generalization. In this work, we focus on investigating dataset artifacts and developing strategies to address these issues. Through the utilization of a novel statistical testing procedure, we discover a significant association between vocabulary distribution and text entailment classes, emphasizing vocabulary as a notable source of biases. To mitigate these issues, we propose several automatic data augmentation strategies spanning character to word levels. By fine-tuning the ELECTRA pre-trained language model, we compare the performance of boosted models with augmented data against their baseline counterparts. The experiments demonstrate that the proposed approaches effectively enhance model accuracy and reduce biases by up to 0.66% and 1.14%, respectively.

Related papers

• Relation-based Counterfactual Data Augmentation and Contrastive Learning for Robustifying Natural Language Inference Models [0.0]
  We propose a method in which we use token-based and sentence-based augmentation methods to generate counterfactual sentence pairs. We show that the proposed method can improve the performance and robustness of the NLI model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T03:43:25Z)
• From Text to Treatment Effects: A Meta-Learning Approach to Handling Text-Based Confounding [7.5348062792]
  This paper examines the performance of meta-learners when confounding variables are expressed in text. We show that learners using pre-trained text representations of confounders achieve improved CATE estimates. Due to the entangled nature of the text embeddings, these models do not fully match the performance of meta-learners with perfect confounder knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T19:46:19Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models Using Contrast Sets: An Experimental Approach [0.0]
  We introduce an innovative technique for generating a contrast set for the Stanford Natural Language Inference dataset. Our strategy involves the automated substitution of verbs, adverbs, and adjectives with their synonyms to preserve the original meaning of sentences. This method aims to assess whether a model's performance is based on genuine language comprehension or simply on pattern recognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T02:03:28Z)
• mFACE: Multilingual Summarization with Factual Consistency Evaluation [79.60172087719356]
  Abstractive summarization has enjoyed renewed interest in recent years, thanks to pre-trained language models and the availability of large-scale datasets. Despite promising results, current models still suffer from generating factually inconsistent summaries. We leverage factual consistency evaluation models to improve multilingual summarization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T19:52:41Z)
• Multi-Scales Data Augmentation Approach In Natural Language Inference For Artifacts Mitigation And Pre-Trained Model Optimization [0.0]
  We provide a variety of techniques for analyzing and locating dataset artifacts inside the crowdsourced Stanford Natural Language Inference corpus. To mitigate dataset artifacts, we employ a unique multi-scale data augmentation technique with two distinct frameworks. Our combination method enhances our model's resistance to perturbation testing, enabling it to continuously outperform the pre-trained baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-16T23:37:44Z)
• Automatically Identifying Semantic Bias in Crowdsourced Natural Language Inference Datasets [78.6856732729301]
  We introduce a model-driven, unsupervised technique to find "bias clusters" in a learned embedding space of hypotheses in NLI datasets. interventions and additional rounds of labeling can be performed to ameliorate the semantic bias of the hypothesis distribution of a dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-16T22:49:01Z)
• Improving Classifier Training Efficiency for Automatic Cyberbullying Detection with Feature Density [58.64907136562178]
  We study the effectiveness of Feature Density (FD) using different linguistically-backed feature preprocessing methods. We hypothesise that estimating dataset complexity allows for the reduction of the number of required experiments. The difference in linguistic complexity of datasets allows us to additionally discuss the efficacy of linguistically-backed word preprocessing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-02T15:48:28Z)
• On the Language Coverage Bias for Neural Machine Translation [81.81456880770762]
  Language coverage bias is important for neural machine translation (NMT) because the target-original training data is not well exploited in current practice. By carefully designing experiments, we provide comprehensive analyses of the language coverage bias in the training data. We propose two simple and effective approaches to alleviate the language coverage bias problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T01:55:34Z)
• Improving Commonsense Causal Reasoning by Adversarial Training and Data Augmentation [14.92157586545743]
  This paper presents a number of techniques for making models more robust in the domain of causal reasoning. We show a statistically significant improvement on performance and on both datasets, even with only a small number of additionally generated data points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-13T09:55:29Z)
• Improving Robustness by Augmenting Training Sentences with Predicate-Argument Structures [62.562760228942054]
  Existing approaches to improve robustness against dataset biases mostly focus on changing the training objective. We propose to augment the input sentences in the training data with their corresponding predicate-argument structures. We show that without targeting a specific bias, our sentence augmentation improves the robustness of transformer models against multiple biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-23T16:22:05Z)
• Data Augmentation for Spoken Language Understanding via Pretrained Language Models [113.56329266325902]
  Training of spoken language understanding (SLU) models often faces the problem of data scarcity. We put forward a data augmentation method using pretrained language models to boost the variability and accuracy of generated utterances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-29T04:07:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.