Founder-GPT: Self-play to evaluate the Founder-Idea fit

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.12037v2
• Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 17:42:18 GMT
• Title: Founder-GPT: Self-play to evaluate the Founder-Idea fit
• Authors: Sichao Xiong and Yigit Ihlamur
• Abstract summary: This research introduces an innovative evaluation method for the "founder-idea" fit in early-stage startups. It uses advanced large language model techniques to assess founders' profiles against their startup ideas to enhance decision-making.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: This research introduces an innovative evaluation method for the "founder-idea" fit in early-stage startups, utilizing advanced large language model techniques to assess founders' profiles against their startup ideas to enhance decision-making. Embeddings, self-play, tree-of-thought, and critique-based refinement techniques show early promising results that each idea's success patterns are unique and they should be evaluated based on the context of the founder's background.

Related papers

• Offline Evaluation of Set-Based Text-to-Image Generation [55.1766769455424]
  Ideation is an important subclass of Text-to-Image (TTI) tasks. Existing evaluation metrics for TTI remain focused on distributional similarity metrics. We develop TTI evaluation metrics with explicit models of how users browse and interact with sets of spatially arranged generated images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T18:04:00Z)
• Good Idea or Not, Representation of LLM Could Tell [86.36317971482755]
  We focus on idea assessment, which aims to leverage the knowledge of large language models to assess the merit of scientific ideas. We release a benchmark dataset from nearly four thousand manuscript papers with full texts, meticulously designed to train and evaluate the performance of different approaches to this task. Our findings suggest that the representations of large language models hold more potential in quantifying the value of ideas than their generative outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-07T02:07:22Z)
• A Fused Large Language Model for Predicting Startup Success [21.75303916815358]
  We develop a machine learning approach with the aim of locating successful startups on venture capital platforms. Specifically, we develop, train, and evaluate a tailored, fused large language model to predict startup success. Using 20,172 online profiles from Crunchbase, we find that our fused large language model can predict startup success.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-05T16:22:31Z)
• Automating Venture Capital: Founder assessment using LLM-powered segmentation, feature engineering and automated labeling techniques [0.0]
  This study explores the application of large language models (LLMs) in venture capital (VC) decision-making. We utilize LLM prompting techniques, like chain-of-thought, to generate features from limited data, then extract insights through statistics and machine learning. Our results reveal potential relationships between certain founder characteristics and success, as well as demonstrate the effectiveness of these characteristics in prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-05T22:54:13Z)
• Are we making progress in unlearning? Findings from the first NeurIPS unlearning competition [70.60872754129832]
  First NeurIPS competition on unlearning sought to stimulate the development of novel algorithms. Nearly 1,200 teams from across the world participated. We analyze top solutions and delve into discussions on benchmarking unlearning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T12:58:00Z)
• Towards Personalized Evaluation of Large Language Models with An Anonymous Crowd-Sourcing Platform [64.76104135495576]
  We propose a novel anonymous crowd-sourcing evaluation platform, BingJian, for large language models. Through this platform, users have the opportunity to submit their questions, testing the models on a personalized and potentially broader range of capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T07:31:20Z)
• Startup success prediction and VC portfolio simulation using CrunchBase data [1.7897779505837144]
  This paper focuses on startups at their Series B and Series C investment stages, aiming to predict key success milestones. We introduce novel deep learning model for predicting startup success, integrating a variety of factors such as funding metrics, founder features, industry category. Our work demonstrates the considerable promise of deep learning models and alternative unstructured data in predicting startup success.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T10:22:37Z)
• KPEval: Towards Fine-Grained Semantic-Based Keyphrase Evaluation [69.57018875757622]
  We propose KPEval, a comprehensive evaluation framework consisting of four critical aspects: reference agreement, faithfulness, diversity, and utility. Using KPEval, we re-evaluate 23 keyphrase systems and discover that established model comparison results have blind-spots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-27T17:45:38Z)
• Deconfounded Causal Collaborative Filtering [56.41625001876272]
  Recommender systems may be confounded by various types of confounding factors (also called confounders) We propose Deconfounded Causal Collaborative Filtering (DCCF) to solve the problem. Our method is able to deconfound unobserved confounders to achieve better recommendation performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-14T02:23:33Z)
• Design principles for a hybrid intelligence decision support system for business model validation [4.127347156839169]
  This paper develops design principles for a Hybrid Intelligence decision support system (HI-DSS) We follow a design science research approach to design a prototype artifact and a set of design principles. Our study provides prescriptive knowledge for HI-DSS and contributes to previous work on decision support for business models, the applications of complementary strengths of humans and machines for making decisions, and support systems for extremely uncertain decision-making problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T16:13:36Z)
• HyMap: eliciting hypotheses in early-stage software startups using cognitive mapping [10.60958748634425]
  We aim to develop a technique to identify hypotheses for early-stage software startups. We developed the HyMap, a hypotheses elicitation technique based on cognitive mapping.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-18T17:29:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.