A Case Study on Test Case Construction with Large Language Models:
Unveiling Practical Insights and Challenges
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.12598v2
- Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 20:33:06 GMT
- Title: A Case Study on Test Case Construction with Large Language Models:
Unveiling Practical Insights and Challenges
- Authors: Roberto Francisco de Lima Junior and Luiz Fernando Paes de Barros
Presta and Lucca Santos Borborema and Vanderson Nogueira da Silva and Marcio
Leal de Melo Dahia and Anderson Carlos Sousa e Santos
- Abstract summary: This paper examines the application of Large Language Models in the construction of test cases within the context of software engineering.
Through a blend of qualitative and quantitative analyses, this study assesses the impact of LLMs on test case comprehensiveness, accuracy, and efficiency.
- Score: 2.7029792239733914
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: This paper presents a detailed case study examining the application of Large
Language Models (LLMs) in the construction of test cases within the context of
software engineering. LLMs, characterized by their advanced natural language
processing capabilities, are increasingly garnering attention as tools to
automate and enhance various aspects of the software development life cycle.
Leveraging a case study methodology, we systematically explore the integration
of LLMs in the test case construction process, aiming to shed light on their
practical efficacy, challenges encountered, and implications for software
quality assurance. The study encompasses the selection of a representative
software application, the formulation of test case construction methodologies
employing LLMs, and the subsequent evaluation of outcomes. Through a blend of
qualitative and quantitative analyses, this study assesses the impact of LLMs
on test case comprehensiveness, accuracy, and efficiency. Additionally, delves
into challenges such as model interpretability and adaptation to diverse
software contexts. The findings from this case study contributes with nuanced
insights into the practical utility of LLMs in the domain of test case
construction, elucidating their potential benefits and limitations. By
addressing real-world scenarios and complexities, this research aims to inform
software practitioners and researchers alike about the tangible implications of
incorporating LLMs into the software testing landscape, fostering a more
comprehensive understanding of their role in optimizing the software
development process.
Related papers
- EVOLvE: Evaluating and Optimizing LLMs For Exploration [76.66831821738927]
Large language models (LLMs) remain under-studied in scenarios requiring optimal decision-making under uncertainty.
We measure LLMs' (in)ability to make optimal decisions in bandits, a state-less reinforcement learning setting relevant to many applications.
Motivated by the existence of optimal exploration algorithms, we propose efficient ways to integrate this algorithmic knowledge into LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-08T17:54:03Z) - Cognitive LLMs: Towards Integrating Cognitive Architectures and Large Language Models for Manufacturing Decision-making [51.737762570776006]
LLM-ACTR is a novel neuro-symbolic architecture that provides human-aligned and versatile decision-making.
Our framework extracts and embeds knowledge of ACT-R's internal decision-making process as latent neural representations.
Our experiments on novel Design for Manufacturing tasks show both improved task performance as well as improved grounded decision-making capability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-17T11:49:53Z) - Can Long-Context Language Models Subsume Retrieval, RAG, SQL, and More? [54.667202878390526]
Long-context language models (LCLMs) have the potential to revolutionize our approach to tasks traditionally reliant on external tools like retrieval systems or databases.
We introduce LOFT, a benchmark of real-world tasks requiring context up to millions of tokens designed to evaluate LCLMs' performance on in-context retrieval and reasoning.
Our findings reveal LCLMs' surprising ability to rival state-of-the-art retrieval and RAG systems, despite never having been explicitly trained for these tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-19T00:28:58Z) - Exploring and Benchmarking the Planning Capabilities of Large Language Models [57.23454975238014]
This work lays the foundations for improving planning capabilities of large language models (LLMs)
We construct a comprehensive benchmark suite encompassing both classical planning benchmarks and natural language scenarios.
We investigate the use of many-shot in-context learning to enhance LLM planning, exploring the relationship between increased context length and improved planning performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-18T22:57:06Z) - A Software Engineering Perspective on Testing Large Language Models: Research, Practice, Tools and Benchmarks [2.8061460833143346]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly becoming ubiquitous both as stand-alone tools and as components of current and future software systems.
To enable usage of LLMs in the high-stake or safety-critical systems of 2030, they need to undergo rigorous testing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-12T13:45:45Z) - Towards Coarse-to-Fine Evaluation of Inference Efficiency for Large Language Models [95.96734086126469]
Large language models (LLMs) can serve as the assistant to help users accomplish their jobs, and also support the development of advanced applications.
For the wide application of LLMs, the inference efficiency is an essential concern, which has been widely studied in existing work.
We perform a detailed coarse-to-fine analysis of the inference performance of various code libraries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-17T15:57:50Z) - Enhancing LLM-based Test Generation for Hard-to-Cover Branches via Program Analysis [8.31978033489419]
We propose TELPA, a novel technique to generate tests that can reach hard-to-cover branches.
Our experimental results on 27 open-source Python projects demonstrate that TELPA significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art SBST and LLM-based techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-07T14:08:28Z) - LLM Inference Unveiled: Survey and Roofline Model Insights [62.92811060490876]
Large Language Model (LLM) inference is rapidly evolving, presenting a unique blend of opportunities and challenges.
Our survey stands out from traditional literature reviews by not only summarizing the current state of research but also by introducing a framework based on roofline model.
This framework identifies the bottlenecks when deploying LLMs on hardware devices and provides a clear understanding of practical problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-26T07:33:05Z) - RITFIS: Robust input testing framework for LLMs-based intelligent
software [6.439196068684973]
RITFIS is the first framework designed to assess the robustness of intelligent software against natural language inputs.
RITFIS adapts 17 automated testing methods, originally designed for Deep Neural Network (DNN)-based intelligent software.
It demonstrates the effectiveness of RITFIS in evaluating LLM-based intelligent software through empirical validation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-21T04:00:54Z) - Are We Testing or Being Tested? Exploring the Practical Applications of
Large Language Models in Software Testing [0.0]
A Large Language Model (LLM) represents a cutting-edge artificial intelligence model that generates coherent content.
LLM can play a pivotal role in software development, including software testing.
This study explores the practical application of LLMs in software testing within an industrial setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-08T06:30:37Z) - Software Testing with Large Language Models: Survey, Landscape, and
Vision [32.34617250991638]
Pre-trained large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a breakthrough technology in natural language processing and artificial intelligence.
This paper provides a comprehensive review of the utilization of LLMs in software testing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-14T08:26:12Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.