Gemini vs GPT-4V: A Preliminary Comparison and Combination of
Vision-Language Models Through Qualitative Cases
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.15011v1
- Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 18:59:58 GMT
- Title: Gemini vs GPT-4V: A Preliminary Comparison and Combination of
Vision-Language Models Through Qualitative Cases
- Authors: Zhangyang Qi, Ye Fang, Mengchen Zhang, Zeyi Sun, Tong Wu, Ziwei Liu,
Dahua Lin, Jiaqi Wang, Hengshuang Zhao
- Abstract summary: This paper presents an in-depth comparative study of two pioneering models: Google's Gemini and OpenAI's GPT-4V(ision)
The core of our analysis delves into the distinct visual comprehension abilities of each model.
Our findings illuminate the unique strengths and niches of both models.
- Score: 98.35348038111508
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The rapidly evolving sector of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) is
at the forefront of integrating linguistic and visual processing in artificial
intelligence. This paper presents an in-depth comparative study of two
pioneering models: Google's Gemini and OpenAI's GPT-4V(ision). Our study
involves a multi-faceted evaluation of both models across key dimensions such
as Vision-Language Capability, Interaction with Humans, Temporal Understanding,
and assessments in both Intelligence and Emotional Quotients. The core of our
analysis delves into the distinct visual comprehension abilities of each model.
We conducted a series of structured experiments to evaluate their performance
in various industrial application scenarios, offering a comprehensive
perspective on their practical utility. We not only involve direct performance
comparisons but also include adjustments in prompts and scenarios to ensure a
balanced and fair analysis. Our findings illuminate the unique strengths and
niches of both models. GPT-4V distinguishes itself with its precision and
succinctness in responses, while Gemini excels in providing detailed, expansive
answers accompanied by relevant imagery and links. These understandings not
only shed light on the comparative merits of Gemini and GPT-4V but also
underscore the evolving landscape of multimodal foundation models, paving the
way for future advancements in this area. After the comparison, we attempted to
achieve better results by combining the two models. Finally, We would like to
express our profound gratitude to the teams behind GPT-4V and Gemini for their
pioneering contributions to the field. Our acknowledgments are also extended to
the comprehensive qualitative analysis presented in 'Dawn' by Yang et al. This
work, with its extensive collection of image samples, prompts, and
GPT-4V-related results, provided a foundational basis for our analysis.
Related papers
- Cross-Modal Consistency in Multimodal Large Language Models [33.229271701817616]
We introduce a novel concept termed cross-modal consistency.
Our experimental findings reveal a pronounced inconsistency between the vision and language modalities within GPT-4V.
Our research yields insights into the appropriate utilization of such models and hints at potential avenues for enhancing their design.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-14T08:22:42Z) - VHELM: A Holistic Evaluation of Vision Language Models [75.88987277686914]
We present the Holistic Evaluation of Vision Language Models (VHELM)
VHELM aggregates various datasets to cover one or more of the 9 aspects: visual perception, knowledge, reasoning, bias, fairness, multilinguality, robustness, toxicity, and safety.
Our framework is designed to be lightweight and automatic so that evaluation runs are cheap and fast.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-09T17:46:34Z) - Benchmarking Multi-Image Understanding in Vision and Language Models: Perception, Knowledge, Reasoning, and Multi-Hop Reasoning [15.296263261737026]
We introduce a Multi-Image MIRB Benchmark to evaluate visual language models' ability to compare, analyze, and reason across multiple images.
Our benchmark encompasses four categories: perception, visual world knowledge, reasoning, and multi-hop reasoning.
We demonstrate that while open-source VLMs were shown to approach the GPT-4V in single-image tasks, a significant gap remains in multi-image reasoning tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-18T16:02:18Z) - Large Language Model Evaluation Via Multi AI Agents: Preliminary results [3.8066447473175304]
We introduce a novel multi-agent AI model that aims to assess and compare the performance of various Large Language Models (LLMs)
Our model consists of eight distinct AI agents, each responsible for retrieving code based on a common description from different advanced language models.
We integrate the HumanEval benchmark into our verification agent to assess the generated code's performance, providing insights into their respective capabilities and efficiencies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-01T10:06:04Z) - Gemini Pro Defeated by GPT-4V: Evidence from Education [1.0226894006814744]
GPT-4V significantly outperforms Gemini Pro in terms of scoring accuracy and Quadratic Weighted Kappa.
Findings suggest GPT-4V's superior capability in handling complex educational tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-27T02:56:41Z) - A Challenger to GPT-4V? Early Explorations of Gemini in Visual Expertise [78.54563675327198]
Gemini is Google's newest and most capable MLLM built from the ground up for multi-modality.
Can Gemini challenge GPT-4V's leading position in multi-modal learning?
We compare Gemini Pro with the state-of-the-art GPT-4V to evaluate its upper limits, along with the latest open-sourced MLLM, Sphinx.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-19T18:59:22Z) - GPT-4V(ision) as a Generalist Evaluator for Vision-Language Tasks [70.98062518872999]
We validate GPT-4V's capabilities for evaluation purposes, addressing tasks ranging from foundational image-to-text and text-to-image synthesis to high-level image-to-image translations and multi-images to text alignment.
Notably, GPT-4V shows promising agreement with humans across various tasks and evaluation methods, demonstrating immense potential for multi-modal LLMs as evaluators.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-02T16:11:09Z) - The Dawn of LMMs: Preliminary Explorations with GPT-4V(ision) [121.42924593374127]
We analyze the latest model, GPT-4V, to deepen the understanding of LMMs.
GPT-4V's unprecedented ability in processing arbitrarily interleaved multimodal inputs makes it a powerful multimodal generalist system.
GPT-4V's unique capability of understanding visual markers drawn on input images can give rise to new human-computer interaction methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-29T17:34:51Z) - Exploring the Trade-Offs: Unified Large Language Models vs Local
Fine-Tuned Models for Highly-Specific Radiology NLI Task [49.50140712943701]
We evaluate the performance of ChatGPT/GPT-4 on a radiology NLI task and compare it to other models fine-tuned specifically on task-related data samples.
We also conduct a comprehensive investigation on ChatGPT/GPT-4's reasoning ability by introducing varying levels of inference difficulty.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-18T17:21:48Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.