Cross-Modal Consistency in Multimodal Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.09273v1
• Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 08:22:42 GMT
• Title: Cross-Modal Consistency in Multimodal Large Language Models
• Authors: Xiang Zhang, Senyu Li, Ning Shi, Bradley Hauer, Zijun Wu, Grzegorz Kondrak, Muhammad Abdul-Mageed, Laks V. S. Lakshmanan,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a novel concept termed cross-modal consistency. Our experimental findings reveal a pronounced inconsistency between the vision and language modalities within GPT-4V. Our research yields insights into the appropriate utilization of such models and hints at potential avenues for enhancing their design.
• Score: 33.229271701817616
• License:
• Abstract: Recent developments in multimodal methodologies have marked the beginning of an exciting era for models adept at processing diverse data types, encompassing text, audio, and visual content. Models like GPT-4V, which merge computer vision with advanced language processing, exhibit extraordinary proficiency in handling intricate tasks that require a simultaneous understanding of both textual and visual information. Prior research efforts have meticulously evaluated the efficacy of these Vision Large Language Models (VLLMs) in various domains, including object detection, image captioning, and other related fields. However, existing analyses have often suffered from limitations, primarily centering on the isolated evaluation of each modality's performance while neglecting to explore their intricate cross-modal interactions. Specifically, the question of whether these models achieve the same level of accuracy when confronted with identical task instances across different modalities remains unanswered. In this study, we take the initiative to delve into the interaction and comparison among these modalities of interest by introducing a novel concept termed cross-modal consistency. Furthermore, we propose a quantitative evaluation framework founded on this concept. Our experimental findings, drawn from a curated collection of parallel vision-language datasets developed by us, unveil a pronounced inconsistency between the vision and language modalities within GPT-4V, despite its portrayal as a unified multimodal model. Our research yields insights into the appropriate utilization of such models and hints at potential avenues for enhancing their design.

Related papers

• Corpus Considerations for Annotator Modeling and Scaling [9.263562546969695]
  We show that the commonly used user token model consistently outperforms more complex models. Our findings shed light on the relationship between corpus statistics and annotator modeling performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T22:27:24Z)
• The Revolution of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey [46.84953515670248]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) can seamlessly integrate visual and textual modalities. This paper provides a review of recent visual-based MLLMs, analyzing their architectural choices, multimodal alignment strategies, and training techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T19:01:01Z)
• Veagle: Advancements in Multimodal Representation Learning [0.0]
  This paper introduces a novel approach to enhance the multimodal capabilities of existing models. Our proposed model Veagle, incorporates a unique mechanism inspired by the successes and insights of previous works. Our results indicate a improvement of 5-6 % in performance, with Veagle outperforming existing models by a notable margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-18T12:45:25Z)
• Lost in Translation: When GPT-4V(ision) Can't See Eye to Eye with Text. A Vision-Language-Consistency Analysis of VLLMs and Beyond [7.760124498553333]
  We study whether vision-language models execute vision and language tasks consistently or independently. We introduce a systematic framework that quantifies the capability disparities between different modalities in the multi-modal setting. We introduce "Vision Description Prompting," a method that effectively improves performance in challenging vision-related tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T06:45:11Z)
• StableLLaVA: Enhanced Visual Instruction Tuning with Synthesized Image-Dialogue Data [129.92449761766025]
  We propose a novel data collection methodology that synchronously synthesizes images and dialogues for visual instruction tuning. This approach harnesses the power of generative models, marrying the abilities of ChatGPT and text-to-image generative models. Our research includes comprehensive experiments conducted on various datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-20T12:43:52Z)
• Foundational Models Defining a New Era in Vision: A Survey and Outlook [151.49434496615427]
  Vision systems to see and reason about the compositional nature of visual scenes are fundamental to understanding our world. The models learned to bridge the gap between such modalities coupled with large-scale training data facilitate contextual reasoning, generalization, and prompt capabilities at test time. The output of such models can be modified through human-provided prompts without retraining, e.g., segmenting a particular object by providing a bounding box, having interactive dialogues by asking questions about an image or video scene or manipulating the robot's behavior through language instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T17:59:18Z)
• Scaling Vision-Language Models with Sparse Mixture of Experts [128.0882767889029]
  We show that mixture-of-experts (MoE) techniques can achieve state-of-the-art performance on a range of benchmarks over dense models of equivalent computational cost. Our research offers valuable insights into stabilizing the training of MoE models, understanding the impact of MoE on model interpretability, and balancing the trade-offs between compute performance when scaling vision-language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-13T16:00:31Z)
• MultiViz: An Analysis Benchmark for Visualizing and Understanding Multimodal Models [103.9987158554515]
  MultiViz is a method for analyzing the behavior of multimodal models by scaffolding the problem of interpretability into 4 stages. We show that the complementary stages in MultiViz together enable users to simulate model predictions, assign interpretable concepts to features, perform error analysis on model misclassifications, and use insights from error analysis to debug models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T18:42:06Z)
• DIME: Fine-grained Interpretations of Multimodal Models via Disentangled Local Explanations [119.1953397679783]
  We focus on advancing the state-of-the-art in interpreting multimodal models. Our proposed approach, DIME, enables accurate and fine-grained analysis of multimodal models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T20:52:47Z)
• M2Lens: Visualizing and Explaining Multimodal Models for Sentiment Analysis [28.958168542624062]
  We present an interactive visual analytics system, M2Lens, to visualize and explain multimodal models for sentiment analysis. M2Lens provides explanations on intra- and inter-modal interactions at the global, subset, and local levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-17T15:54:27Z)
• Behind the Scene: Revealing the Secrets of Pre-trained Vision-and-Language Models [65.19308052012858]
  Recent Transformer-based large-scale pre-trained models have revolutionized vision-and-language (V+L) research. We present VALUE, a set of meticulously designed probing tasks to decipher the inner workings of multimodal pre-training. Key observations: Pre-trained models exhibit a propensity for attending over text rather than images during inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-15T01:06:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.