Robustness of Dynamic Quantum Control: Differential Sensitivity Bound

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.00301v3
• Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 18:36:53 GMT
• Title: Robustness of Dynamic Quantum Control: Differential Sensitivity Bound
• Authors: S. P. O'Neil, C. A. Weidner, E. A. Jonckheere, F. C. Langbein, S. G. Schirmer,
• Abstract summary: A new robustness measure based on the differential sensitivity of the gate fidelity error to parametric uncertainties is introduced. It is shown how a maximum allowable perturbation over a set of Hamiltonian uncertainties that guarantees a given fidelity error, can be reliably computed.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Dynamic control via optimized, piecewise-constant pulses is a common paradigm for open-loop control to implement quantum gates. While numerous methods exist for the synthesis of such controls, there are many open questions regarding the robustness of the resulting control schemes in the presence of model uncertainty; unlike in classical control, there are generally no analytical guarantees on the control performance with respect to inexact modeling of the system. In this paper a new robustness measure based on the differential sensitivity of the gate fidelity error to parametric (structured) uncertainties is introduced, and bounds on the differential sensitivity to parametric uncertainties are used to establish performance guarantees for optimal controllers for a variety of quantum gate types, system sizes, and control implementations. Specifically, it is shown how a maximum allowable perturbation over a set of Hamiltonian uncertainties that guarantees a given fidelity error, can be reliably computed. This measure of robustness is inversely proportional to the upper bound on the differential sensitivity of the fidelity error evaluated under nominal operating conditions. Finally, the results show that the nominal fidelity error and differential sensitivity upper bound are positively correlated across a wide range of problems and control implementations, suggesting that in the high-fidelity control regime, rather than there being a trade-off between fidelity and robustness, higher nominal gate fidelities are positively correlated with increased robustness of the controls in the presence of parametric uncertainties.

Related papers

• Regulating Model Reliance on Non-Robust Features by Smoothing Input Marginal Density [93.32594873253534]
  Trustworthy machine learning requires meticulous regulation of model reliance on non-robust features. We propose a framework to delineate and regulate such features by attributing model predictions to the input.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-05T09:16:56Z)
• Sensitivity Bounds for Quantum Control and Time-Domain Performance Guarantees [0.0]
  We provide analytical bounds on the differential sensitivity of the gate fidelity error to structured uncertainties for a closed quantum system controlled by piecewise-constant, optimal control fields. We then use these differential sensitivity bounds to provide conditions that guarantee performance, quantified by the fidelity error, in the face of parameter uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T01:32:33Z)
• Probabilities Are Not Enough: Formal Controller Synthesis for Stochastic Dynamical Models with Epistemic Uncertainty [68.00748155945047]
  Capturing uncertainty in models of complex dynamical systems is crucial to designing safe controllers. Several approaches use formal abstractions to synthesize policies that satisfy temporal specifications related to safety and reachability. Our contribution is a novel abstraction-based controller method for continuous-state models with noise, uncertain parameters, and external disturbances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-12T07:57:03Z)
• Robust Quantum Control: Analysis & Synthesis via Averaging [0.2320417845168326]
  An approach is presented for robustness analysis and quantum (unitary) control synthesis based on the classic method of averaging. The result is a multicriterion optimization competing the nominal (uncertainty-free) fidelity with a well known robustness measure: the size of an interaction (error) Hamiltonian.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-30T12:09:40Z)
• Robustness and Accuracy Could Be Reconcilable by (Proper) Definition [109.62614226793833]
  The trade-off between robustness and accuracy has been widely studied in the adversarial literature. We find that it may stem from the improperly defined robust error, which imposes an inductive bias of local invariance. By definition, SCORE facilitates the reconciliation between robustness and accuracy, while still handling the worst-case uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-21T10:36:09Z)
• Sparsity in Partially Controllable Linear Systems [56.142264865866636]
  We study partially controllable linear dynamical systems specified by an underlying sparsity pattern. Our results characterize those state variables which are irrelevant for optimal control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-12T16:41:47Z)
• Probabilistic robust linear quadratic regulators with Gaussian processes [73.0364959221845]
  Probabilistic models such as Gaussian processes (GPs) are powerful tools to learn unknown dynamical systems from data for subsequent use in control design. We present a novel controller synthesis for linearized GP dynamics that yields robust controllers with respect to a probabilistic stability margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-17T08:36:18Z)
• Enforcing robust control guarantees within neural network policies [76.00287474159973]
  We propose a generic nonlinear control policy class, parameterized by neural networks, that enforces the same provable robustness criteria as robust control. We demonstrate the power of this approach on several domains, improving in average-case performance over existing robust control methods and in worst-case stability over (non-robust) deep RL methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-16T17:14:59Z)
• Robust Learning-Based Control via Bootstrapped Multiplicative Noise [0.0]
  We propose a robust adaptive control algorithm that explicitly incorporates such non-asymptotic uncertainties into the control design. A key advantage of the proposed approach is that the system identification and robust control design procedures both use uncertainty representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-24T04:12:52Z)
• Optimistic robust linear quadratic dual control [4.94950858749529]
  We present a dual control strategy that attempts to combine the performance of certainty equivalence, with the practical utility of robustness. The formulation preserves structure in the representation of parametric uncertainty, which allows the controller to target reduction of uncertainty in the parameters that matter most' for the control task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-12-31T02:02:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.