The Anatomy Spread of Online Opinion Polarization: The Pivotal Role of Super-Spreaders in Social Networks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.01349v1
• Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 20:29:50 GMT
• Title: The Anatomy Spread of Online Opinion Polarization: The Pivotal Role of Super-Spreaders in Social Networks
• Authors: Yasuko Kawahata
• Abstract summary: Type A has a significant influence in shaping opinions, Type B acts as a counterbalance to A, and Type C functions like media, providing an objective viewpoint. The findings offer insights for improving online communication security and understanding social influence.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The study investigates the role of 'superspreaders' in shaping opinions within networks, distinguishing three types: A, B, and C. Type A has a significant influence in shaping opinions, Type B acts as a counterbalance to A, and Type C functions like media, providing an objective viewpoint and potentially regulating A and B's influence. The research uses a confidence coefficient and z-score to survey superspreaders' behaviors, with a focus on the conditions affecting group dynamics and opinion formation, including environmental factors and forgetfulness over time. The findings offer insights for improving online communication security and understanding social influence.

Related papers

• Mitigating Biases in Collective Decision-Making: Enhancing Performance in the Face of Fake News [4.413331329339185]
  We study the influence these biases can have in the pervasive problem of fake news by evaluating human participants' capacity to identify false headlines. By focusing on headlines involving sensitive characteristics, we gather a comprehensive dataset to explore how human responses are shaped by their biases. We show that demographic factors, headline categories, and the manner in which information is presented significantly influence errors in human judgment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T12:08:08Z)
• AFSPP: Agent Framework for Shaping Preference and Personality with Large Language Models [4.6251098692410855]
  We propose Agent Framework for Shaping Preference and Personality (AFSPP) AFSPP explores the multifaceted impact of social networks and subjective consciousness on Agents' preference and personality formation. It can significantly enhance the efficiency and scope of psychological experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-05T15:52:59Z)
• Post-hoc evaluation of nodes influence in information cascades: the case of coordinated accounts [0.0]
  Coordinated Inhautentic Behaviour (CIB) has emerged as a tactic to exploit the online discourse. We quantify the efficacy of CIB tactics by defining a general framework for evaluating the influence of a subset of nodes in a directed tree. We design two algorithms that provide optimal and greedy post-hoc placement strategies that lead to maximising the configuration influence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-03T11:40:46Z)
• Perspective in Opinion Dynamics on Complex Convex Domains of Time Networks for Addiction, Forgetting [0.0]
  The paper presents a model that includes layers A and B with varying degrees of forgetting and dependence over time. We also model changes in dependence and forgetting in layers A, A', B, and B' under certain conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-26T14:36:32Z)
• Decoding Susceptibility: Modeling Misbelief to Misinformation Through a Computational Approach [61.04606493712002]
  Susceptibility to misinformation describes the degree of belief in unverifiable claims that is not observable. Existing susceptibility studies heavily rely on self-reported beliefs. We propose a computational approach to model users' latent susceptibility levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T07:22:56Z)
• Decoding the Silent Majority: Inducing Belief Augmented Social Graph with Large Language Model for Response Forecasting [74.68371461260946]
  SocialSense is a framework that induces a belief-centered graph on top of an existent social network, along with graph-based propagation to capture social dynamics. Our method surpasses existing state-of-the-art in experimental evaluations for both zero-shot and supervised settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T06:17:02Z)
• Measuring the Effect of Influential Messages on Varying Personas [67.1149173905004]
  We present a new task, Response Forecasting on Personas for News Media, to estimate the response a persona might have upon seeing a news message. The proposed task not only introduces personalization in the modeling but also predicts the sentiment polarity and intensity of each response. This enables more accurate and comprehensive inference on the mental state of the persona.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T21:01:00Z)
• Aggression and "hate speech" in communication of media users: analysis of control capabilities [50.591267188664666]
  Authors studied the possibilities of mutual influence of users in new media. They found a high level of aggression and hate speech when discussing an urgent social problem - measures for COVID-19 fighting. Results can be useful for developing media content in a modern digital environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-25T15:53:32Z)
• Identifying Peer Influence in Therapeutic Communities Adjusting for Latent Homophily [1.6385815610837167]
  We investigate peer role model influence on successful graduation from Therapeutic Communities (TCs) for substance abuse and criminal behavior. To identify peer influence in the presence of unobserved homophily in observational data, we model the network with a latent variable model. Our results indicate a positive effect of peers' graduation on residents' graduation and that it differs based on gender, race, and the definition of the role model effect.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-27T06:47:28Z)
• Information Consumption and Social Response in a Segregated Environment: the Case of Gab [74.5095691235917]
  This work provides a characterization of the interaction patterns within Gab around the COVID-19 topic. We find that there are no strong statistical differences in the social response to questionable and reliable content. Our results provide insights toward the understanding of coordinated inauthentic behavior and on the early-warning of information operation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-03T11:34:25Z)
• Interference and Generalization in Temporal Difference Learning [86.31598155056035]
  We study the link between generalization and interference in temporal-difference (TD) learning. We find that TD easily leads to low-interference, under-generalizing parameters, while the effect seems reversed in supervised learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-13T15:49:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.