Uncovering Regulatory Affairs Complexity in Medical Products: A Qualitative Assessment Utilizing Open Coding and Natural Language Processing (NLP)

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.02975v1
• Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2023 03:39:57 GMT
• Title: Uncovering Regulatory Affairs Complexity in Medical Products: A Qualitative Assessment Utilizing Open Coding and Natural Language Processing (NLP)
• Authors: Yu Han, Aaron Ceross, Jeroen H.M. Bergmann
• Abstract summary: The study involved semi-structured interviews with 28 professionals from medical device companies. The participants highlighted the need for strategies to streamline regulatory compliance. The study concludes that these elements are vital for establishing coherent and effective regulatory procedures.
• Score: 3.8657431480664717
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This study investigates the complexity of regulatory affairs in the medical device industry, a critical factor influencing market access and patient care. Through qualitative research, we sought expert insights to understand the factors contributing to this complexity. The study involved semi-structured interviews with 28 professionals from medical device companies, specializing in various aspects of regulatory affairs. These interviews were analyzed using open coding and Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques. The findings reveal key sources of complexity within the regulatory landscape, divided into five domains: (A) Regulatory language complexity, (B) Intricacies within the regulatory process, (C) Global-level complexities, (D) Database-related considerations, and (E) Product-level issues. The participants highlighted the need for strategies to streamline regulatory compliance, enhance interactions between regulatory bodies and industry players, and develop adaptable frameworks for rapid technological advancements. Emphasizing interdisciplinary collaboration and increased transparency, the study concludes that these elements are vital for establishing coherent and effective regulatory procedures in the medical device sector.

Related papers

• Large Language Models Struggle in Token-Level Clinical Named Entity Recognition [12.972058180227194]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized various sectors, including healthcare where they are employed in diverse applications. Named Entity Recognition (NER) stands out as an essential task and it plays a crucial role in extracting relevant information from clinical texts. This study aims to bridge this gap by investigating the effectiveness of both proprietary and local LLMs in token-level clinical NER.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-30T15:38:48Z)
• A Survey on Large Language Models for Critical Societal Domains: Finance, Healthcare, and Law [65.87885628115946]
  Large language models (LLMs) are revolutionizing the landscapes of finance, healthcare, and law. We highlight the instrumental role of LLMs in enhancing diagnostic and treatment methodologies in healthcare, innovating financial analytics, and refining legal interpretation and compliance strategies. We critically examine the ethics for LLM applications in these fields, pointing out the existing ethical concerns and the need for transparent, fair, and robust AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T22:43:02Z)
• Accelerating Radio Spectrum Regulation Workflows with Large Language Models (LLMs) [0.0]
  This paper demonstrates example applications of Large Language Models (LLMs) to expedite spectrum regulatory processes. We explore various roles that LLMs can play in this context while identifying some of the challenges to address.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T15:54:48Z)
• Analysis of Blockchain Integration in the e-Healthcare Ecosystem [0.0]
  This article studies the most commonly adopted approaches in healthcare data management systems using blockchain technology. An evaluation is conducted based on a set of observed common characteristics, distinguishing one approach from the others. For effective implementation in the context of e-health, we emphasize the existence of crucial challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-08T12:19:53Z)
• Designing Interpretable ML System to Enhance Trust in Healthcare: A Systematic Review to Proposed Responsible Clinician-AI-Collaboration Framework [13.215318138576713]
  The paper reviews interpretable AI processes, methods, applications, and the challenges of implementation in healthcare. It aims to foster a comprehensive understanding of the crucial role of a robust interpretability approach in healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-18T12:29:18Z)
• Regulation and NLP (RegNLP): Taming Large Language Models [51.41095330188972]
  We argue how NLP research can benefit from proximity to regulatory studies and adjacent fields. We advocate for the development of a new multidisciplinary research space on regulation and NLP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T09:22:40Z)
• Validating polyp and instrument segmentation methods in colonoscopy through Medico 2020 and MedAI 2021 Challenges [58.32937972322058]
  "Medico automatic polyp segmentation (Medico 2020)" and "MedAI: Transparency in Medical Image (MedAI 2021)" competitions. We present a comprehensive summary and analyze each contribution, highlight the strength of the best-performing methods, and discuss the possibility of clinical translations of such methods into the clinic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-30T16:08:45Z)
• On the Complexity of Multi-Agent Decision Making: From Learning in Games to Partial Monitoring [105.13668993076801]
  A central problem in the theory of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is to understand what structural conditions and algorithmic principles lead to sample-efficient learning guarantees. We study this question in a general framework for interactive decision making with multiple agents. We show that characterizing the statistical complexity for multi-agent decision making is equivalent to characterizing the statistical complexity of single-agent decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-01T06:46:22Z)
• Validation of artificial intelligence containing products across the regulated healthcare industries [0.0]
  Introduction of artificial intelligence / machine learning (AI/ML) products to regulated fields poses new regulatory problems. Lack of a common terminology and understanding leads to confusion, delays and product failures. Validation as a key step in product development offers an opportune point of comparison for aligning people and processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-13T14:03:36Z)
• GDPR Compliant Collection of Therapist-Patient-Dialogues [48.091760741427656]
  We elaborate on the challenges we faced in starting our collection of therapist-patient dialogues in a psychiatry clinic under the General Data Privacy Regulation of the European Union. We give an overview of each step in our procedure and point out the potential pitfalls to motivate further research in this field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-22T15:51:10Z)
• The Medkit-Learn(ing) Environment: Medical Decision Modelling through Simulation [81.72197368690031]
  We present a new benchmarking suite designed specifically for medical sequential decision making. The Medkit-Learn(ing) Environment is a publicly available Python package providing simple and easy access to high-fidelity synthetic medical data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-08T10:38:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.