Enhanced Automated Code Vulnerability Repair using Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.03741v1
- Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 09:01:29 GMT
- Title: Enhanced Automated Code Vulnerability Repair using Large Language Models
- Authors: David de-Fitero-Dominguez, Eva Garcia-Lopez, Antonio Garcia-Cabot,
Jose-Javier Martinez-Herraiz
- Abstract summary: This research addresses the complex challenge of automated repair of code vulnerabilities.
It introduces a novel format for the representation of code modification, using advanced Large Language Models (LLMs)
LLMs, fine-tuned on datasets featuring C code vulnerabilities, significantly improve the accuracy and adaptability of automated code repair techniques.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: This research addresses the complex challenge of automated repair of code
vulnerabilities, vital for enhancing digital security in an increasingly
technology-driven world. The study introduces a novel and efficient format for
the representation of code modification, using advanced Large Language Models
(LLMs) such as Code Llama and Mistral. These models, fine-tuned on datasets
featuring C code vulnerabilities, significantly improve the accuracy and
adaptability of automated code repair techniques. A key finding is the enhanced
repair accuracy of these models when compared to previous methods such as
VulRepair, which underscores their practical utility and efficiency. The
research also offers a critical assessment of current evaluation metrics, such
as perfect predictions, and their limitations in reflecting the true
capabilities of automated repair models in real-world scenarios. Following
this, it underscores the importance of using test datasets devoid of train
samples, emphasizing the need for dataset integrity to enhance the
effectiveness of LLMs in code repair tasks. The significance of this work is
its contribution to digital security, setting new standards for automated code
vulnerability repair and paving the way for future advancements in the fields
of cybersecurity and artificial intelligence. The study does not only highlight
the potential of LLMs in enhancing code security but also fosters further
exploration and research in these crucial areas.
Related papers
- SCoPE: Evaluating LLMs for Software Vulnerability Detection [0.0]
This work explores and refines the CVEFixes dataset, which is commonly used to train models for code-related tasks.
The output generated by SCoPE was used to create a new version of CVEFixes.
The results show that SCoPE successfully helped to identify 905 duplicates within the evaluated subset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-19T15:02:00Z) - Is Your AI-Generated Code Really Safe? Evaluating Large Language Models on Secure Code Generation with CodeSecEval [20.959848710829878]
Large language models (LLMs) have brought significant advancements to code generation and code repair.
However, their training using unsanitized data from open-source repositories, like GitHub, raises the risk of inadvertently propagating security vulnerabilities.
We aim to present a comprehensive study aimed at precisely evaluating and enhancing the security aspects of code LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-02T16:13:21Z) - Agent-Driven Automatic Software Improvement [55.2480439325792]
This research proposal aims to explore innovative solutions by focusing on the deployment of agents powered by Large Language Models (LLMs)
The iterative nature of agents, which allows for continuous learning and adaptation, can help surpass common challenges in code generation.
We aim to use the iterative feedback in these systems to further fine-tune the LLMs underlying the agents, becoming better aligned to the task of automated software improvement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-24T15:45:22Z) - Vulnerability Detection with Code Language Models: How Far Are We? [40.455600722638906]
PrimeVul is a new dataset for training and evaluating code LMs for vulnerability detection.
It incorporates a novel set of data labeling techniques that achieve comparable label accuracy to human-verified benchmarks.
It also implements a rigorous data de-duplication and chronological data splitting strategy to mitigate data leakage issues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-27T14:34:29Z) - The Frontier of Data Erasure: Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models [56.26002631481726]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are foundational to AI advancements.
LLMs pose risks by potentially memorizing and disseminating sensitive, biased, or copyrighted information.
Machine unlearning emerges as a cutting-edge solution to mitigate these concerns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-23T09:26:15Z) - QualEval: Qualitative Evaluation for Model Improvement [82.73561470966658]
We propose QualEval, which augments quantitative scalar metrics with automated qualitative evaluation as a vehicle for model improvement.
QualEval uses a powerful LLM reasoner and our novel flexible linear programming solver to generate human-readable insights.
We demonstrate that leveraging its insights, for example, improves the absolute performance of the Llama 2 model by up to 15% points relative.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-06T00:21:44Z) - Enhancing Large Language Models for Secure Code Generation: A
Dataset-driven Study on Vulnerability Mitigation [24.668682498171776]
Large language models (LLMs) have brought significant advancements to code generation, benefiting both novice and experienced developers.
However, their training using unsanitized data from open-source repositories, like GitHub, introduces the risk of inadvertently propagating security vulnerabilities.
This paper presents a comprehensive study focused on evaluating and enhancing code LLMs from a software security perspective.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-25T00:32:56Z) - CodeLMSec Benchmark: Systematically Evaluating and Finding Security
Vulnerabilities in Black-Box Code Language Models [58.27254444280376]
Large language models (LLMs) for automatic code generation have achieved breakthroughs in several programming tasks.
Training data for these models is usually collected from the Internet (e.g., from open-source repositories) and is likely to contain faults and security vulnerabilities.
This unsanitized training data can cause the language models to learn these vulnerabilities and propagate them during the code generation procedure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-08T11:54:07Z) - Enabling Automatic Repair of Source Code Vulnerabilities Using
Data-Driven Methods [0.4568777157687961]
We propose ways to improve code representations for vulnerability repair from three perspectives.
Data-driven models of automatic program repair use pairs of buggy and fixed code to learn transformations that fix errors in code.
The expected results of this work are improved code representations for automatic program repair and, specifically, fixing security vulnerabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-07T10:47:37Z) - VELVET: a noVel Ensemble Learning approach to automatically locate
VulnErable sTatements [62.93814803258067]
This paper presents VELVET, a novel ensemble learning approach to locate vulnerable statements in source code.
Our model combines graph-based and sequence-based neural networks to successfully capture the local and global context of a program graph.
VELVET achieves 99.6% and 43.6% top-1 accuracy over synthetic data and real-world data, respectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-20T22:45:27Z) - Anomaly Detection Based on Selection and Weighting in Latent Space [73.01328671569759]
We propose a novel selection-and-weighting-based anomaly detection framework called SWAD.
Experiments on both benchmark and real-world datasets have shown the effectiveness and superiority of SWAD.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-08T10:56:38Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.