Hidden Variables: Rehabilitation of von Neumann's Analysis, and Pauli's Uncashable Check

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.04002v2
• Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 17:35:26 GMT
• Title: Hidden Variables: Rehabilitation of von Neumann's Analysis, and Pauli's Uncashable Check
• Authors: Robert Golub, Steve K. Lamoreaux,
• Abstract summary: J. von Neumann performed an analysis of the consequences of introducing hidden parameters (hidden variables) into quantum mechanics. He showed that hidden variables cannot be incorporated into the existing theory of quantum mechanics without major modifications. He left open the possibility that the theory is not complete.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In his book \textit{The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics}, published in 1932, J. von Neumann performed an analysis of the consequences of introducing hidden parameters (hidden variables) into quantum mechanics. He showed that hidden variables cannot be incorporated into the existing theory of quantum mechanics without major modifications, and concluded that if they did exist, the theory would have already failed in situations where it has been successfully applied. von Neumann left open the possibility that the theory is not complete, and his analysis for internal consistency is the best that can be done for a self-referenced logical system (G\"odel's theorem). This analysis had been taken as an ``incorrect proof" against the existence of hidden variables. von Neumann's so-called proof isn't even wrong as such a proof does not exist. One of the earliest attempts at a hidden variable theory was by D. Bohm, and because there were no experimental consequences, W. Pauli referred to it as an ``uncashable check." To our knowledge, a successful hidden variable extension to quantum mechanics with testable consequences has not yet been produced, suggesting that von Neumann's analysis is worthy of rehabilitation, which we attempt to provide in a straightforward manner.

Related papers

• Simple Tests of Quantumness Also Certify Qubits [69.96668065491183]
  A test of quantumness is a protocol that allows a classical verifier to certify (only) that a prover is not classical. We show that tests of quantumness that follow a certain template, which captures recent proposals such as (Kalai et al., 2022) can in fact do much more. Namely, the same protocols can be used for certifying a qubit, a building-block that stands at the heart of applications such as certifiable randomness and classical delegation of quantum computation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T14:18:17Z)
• Quantum theory can consistently describe the use of itself in Frauchiger-Renner's Gedankenexperiment [0.0]
  Frauchiger and Renner have presented a no-go theorem, which makes quantum mechanics more controversial. We discuss the validity of their proof approach in this letter.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-19T12:36:53Z)
• On a gap in the proof of the generalised quantum Stein's lemma and its consequences for the reversibility of quantum resources [51.243733928201024]
  We show that the proof of the generalised quantum Stein's lemma is not correct due to a gap in the argument leading to Lemma III.9. This puts into question a number of established results in the literature, in particular the reversibility of quantum entanglement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-05T17:46:05Z)
• Von Neumann's information engine without the spectral theorem [1.933681537640272]
  We show that the role of the spectral theorem in von Neumann's argument can be taken over by the operational assumptions of repeatability and reversibility. As a byproduct, we obtain the Groenewold--Ozawa information gain as a natural monotone for a suitable ordering of instruments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-10T09:40:05Z)
• Von Neumann's book, the Compton-Simon experiment and the collapse hypothesis [0.0]
  We find that von Neumann had relied on his phenomenal memory rather than the printed Compton-Simon paper, and his memory had failed him for once. An Appendix raises some questions for historians of physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-04T10:50:08Z)
• About the description of physical reality of Bell's experiment [91.3755431537592]
  A hidden variables model complying with the simplest form of Local Realism was recently introduced. It reproduces Quantum Mechanics' predictions for an even ideally perfect Bell's experiment. A new type of quantum computer does not exist yet, not even in theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-06T15:55:13Z)
• On the Unconditional Validity of J. von Neumann's Proof of the Impossibility of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
  I show that Neumann's assumption of the linear additivity of the expectation values, even for incompatible (noncommuting) observables, is a necessary constraint. I show that it is Bell's counter-example that is fundamentally flawed, being inconsistent with the factual mechanics. I identify the uncertainty in the action as the reason for the irreducible dispersion, which implies that there are no dispersion-free ensembles at any scale of mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-27T13:36:08Z)
• Post-Quantum Succinct Arguments: Breaking the Quantum Rewinding Barrier [73.70426431502803]
  We prove that Kilian's four-message succinct argument system is post-quantum secure in the standard model. This yields the first post-quantum succinct argument system from any falsifiable assumption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-15T05:09:17Z)
• Impossibility of creating a superposition of unknown quantum states [16.467540842571328]
  We show that the existence of a protocol that superposes two unknown pure states with nonzero probability leads to violation of other no-go theorems. Such a protocol can be used to perform certain state discrimination and cloning tasks that are forbidden in quantum theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T13:25:42Z)
• A Man Misunderstood: Von Neumann did not claim that his entropy corresponds to the phenomenological thermodynamic entropy [0.0]
  Recently, attention has returned to the now-famous 1932 thought experiment in which John von Neumann establishes the form of the quantum mechanical von Neumann entropy -Tr $ rho ln rho $ ($S_VN$) I argue that the existing literature misunderstands and misrepresents his goals. A revised understanding is required before the success of von Neumann's reversible gas transformation can be definitively granted or denied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-13T20:29:11Z)
• Quantum Mechanical description of Bell's experiment assumes Locality [91.3755431537592]
  Bell's experiment description assumes the (Quantum Mechanics-language equivalent of the classical) condition of Locality. This result is complementary to a recently published one demonstrating that non-Locality is necessary to describe said experiment. It is concluded that, within the framework of Quantum Mechanics, there is absolutely no reason to believe in the existence of non-Local effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-27T15:04:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.