Theory of Mind abilities of Large Language Models in Human-Robot Interaction : An Illusion?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.05302v2
• Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 18:45:39 GMT
• Title: Theory of Mind abilities of Large Language Models in Human-Robot Interaction : An Illusion?
• Authors: Mudit Verma, Siddhant Bhambri, Subbarao Kambhampati
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models have shown exceptional generative abilities in various natural language and generation tasks. We study a special application of ToM abilities that has higher stakes and possibly irreversible consequences. We focus on the task of Perceived Behavior Recognition, where a robot employs a Large Language Model (LLM) to assess the robot's generated behavior in a manner similar to human observer.
• Score: 18.770522926093786
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models have shown exceptional generative abilities in various natural language and generation tasks. However, possible anthropomorphization and leniency towards failure cases have propelled discussions on emergent abilities of Large Language Models especially on Theory of Mind (ToM) abilities in Large Language Models. While several false-belief tests exists to verify the ability to infer and maintain mental models of another entity, we study a special application of ToM abilities that has higher stakes and possibly irreversible consequences : Human Robot Interaction. In this work, we explore the task of Perceived Behavior Recognition, where a robot employs a Large Language Model (LLM) to assess the robot's generated behavior in a manner similar to human observer. We focus on four behavior types, namely - explicable, legible, predictable, and obfuscatory behavior which have been extensively used to synthesize interpretable robot behaviors. The LLMs goal is, therefore to be a human proxy to the agent, and to answer how a certain agent behavior would be perceived by the human in the loop, for example "Given a robot's behavior X, would the human observer find it explicable?". We conduct a human subject study to verify that the users are able to correctly answer such a question in the curated situations (robot setting and plan) across five domains. A first analysis of the belief test yields extremely positive results inflating ones expectations of LLMs possessing ToM abilities. We then propose and perform a suite of perturbation tests which breaks this illusion, i.e. Inconsistent Belief, Uninformative Context and Conviction Test. We conclude that, the high score of LLMs on vanilla prompts showcases its potential use in HRI settings, however to possess ToM demands invariance to trivial or irrelevant perturbations in the context which LLMs lack.

Related papers

• $π_0$: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control [77.32743739202543]
  We propose a novel flow matching architecture built on top of a pre-trained vision-language model (VLM) to inherit Internet-scale semantic knowledge. We evaluate our model in terms of its ability to perform tasks in zero shot after pre-training, follow language instructions from people, and its ability to acquire new skills via fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T17:22:30Z)
• Comparing Apples to Oranges: LLM-powered Multimodal Intention Prediction in an Object Categorization Task [17.190635800969456]
  In this paper, we examine using Large Language Models to infer human intention in a collaborative object categorization task with a physical robot. We propose a novel multimodal approach that integrates user non-verbal cues, like hand gestures, body poses, and facial expressions, with environment states and user verbal cues to predict user intentions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-12T12:15:14Z)
• Are Large Language Models Aligned with People's Social Intuitions for Human-Robot Interactions? [7.308479353736709]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in robotics, especially for high-level action planning. In this work, we test whether LLMs reproduce people's intuitions and communication in human-robot interaction scenarios. We show that vision models fail to capture the essence of video stimuli and that LLMs tend to rate different communicative acts and behavior higher than people.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T22:23:23Z)
• PhyGrasp: Generalizing Robotic Grasping with Physics-informed Large Multimodal Models [58.33913881592706]
  Humans can easily apply their intuitive physics to grasp skillfully and change grasps efficiently, even for objects they have never seen before. This work delves into infusing such physical commonsense reasoning into robotic manipulation. We introduce PhyGrasp, a multimodal large model that leverages inputs from two modalities: natural language and 3D point clouds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T18:57:52Z)
• Violation of Expectation via Metacognitive Prompting Reduces Theory of Mind Prediction Error in Large Language Models [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit a compelling level of proficiency in Theory of Mind (ToM) tasks. This ability to impute unobservable mental states to others is vital to human social cognition and may prove equally important in principal-agent relations between humans and Artificial Intelligences (AIs)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T20:05:13Z)
• The Neuro-Symbolic Inverse Planning Engine (NIPE): Modeling Probabilistic Social Inferences from Linguistic Inputs [50.32802502923367]
  We study the process of language driving and influencing social reasoning in a probabilistic goal inference domain. We propose a neuro-symbolic model that carries out goal inference from linguistic inputs of agent scenarios. Our model closely matches human response patterns and better predicts human judgements than using an LLM alone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-25T19:38:01Z)
• Clever Hans or Neural Theory of Mind? Stress Testing Social Reasoning in Large Language Models [82.50173296858377]
  Many anecdotal examples were used to suggest newer large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and GPT-4 exhibit Neural Theory-of-Mind (N-ToM) We investigate the extent of LLMs' N-ToM through an extensive evaluation on 6 tasks and find that while LLMs exhibit certain N-ToM abilities, this behavior is far from being robust.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T06:14:31Z)
• Large Language Models as Zero-Shot Human Models for Human-Robot Interaction [12.455647753787442]
  Large-language models (LLMs) can act as zero-shot human models for human-robot interaction. LLMs achieve performance comparable to purpose-built models. We present one case study on a simulated trust-based table-clearing task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-06T23:16:24Z)
• Robots with Different Embodiments Can Express and Influence Carefulness in Object Manipulation [104.5440430194206]
  This work investigates the perception of object manipulations performed with a communicative intent by two robots. We designed the robots' movements to communicate carefulness or not during the transportation of objects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-03T13:26:52Z)
• Evaluating and Inducing Personality in Pre-trained Language Models [78.19379997967191]
  We draw inspiration from psychometric studies by leveraging human personality theory as a tool for studying machine behaviors. To answer these questions, we introduce the Machine Personality Inventory (MPI) tool for studying machine behaviors. MPI follows standardized personality tests, built upon the Big Five Personality Factors (Big Five) theory and personality assessment inventories. We devise a Personality Prompting (P2) method to induce LLMs with specific personalities in a controllable way.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T07:32:57Z)
• Reasoning about Counterfactuals to Improve Human Inverse Reinforcement Learning [5.072077366588174]
  Humans naturally infer other agents' beliefs and desires by reasoning about their observable behavior. We propose to incorporate the learner's current understanding of the robot's decision making into our model of human IRL. We also propose a novel measure for estimating the difficulty for a human to predict instances of a robot's behavior in unseen environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T17:06:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.