Human-AI Collaborative Essay Scoring: A Dual-Process Framework with LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.06431v2
• Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 03:44:08 GMT
• Title: Human-AI Collaborative Essay Scoring: A Dual-Process Framework with LLMs
• Authors: Changrong Xiao, Wenxing Ma, Qingping Song, Sean Xin Xu, Kunpeng Zhang, Yufang Wang, Qi Fu,
• Abstract summary: This study explores the effectiveness of Large Language Models (LLMs) for automated essay scoring. We propose an open-source LLM-based AES system, inspired by the dual-process theory. We find that our system not only automates the grading process but also enhances the performance and efficiency of human graders.
• Score: 13.262711792955377
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Receiving timely and personalized feedback is essential for second-language learners, especially when human instructors are unavailable. This study explores the effectiveness of Large Language Models (LLMs), including both proprietary and open-source models, for Automated Essay Scoring (AES). Through extensive experiments with public and private datasets, we find that while LLMs do not surpass conventional state-of-the-art (SOTA) grading models in performance, they exhibit notable consistency, generalizability, and explainability. We propose an open-source LLM-based AES system, inspired by the dual-process theory. Our system offers accurate grading and high-quality feedback, at least comparable to that of fine-tuned proprietary LLMs, in addition to its ability to alleviate misgrading. Furthermore, we conduct human-AI co-grading experiments with both novice and expert graders. We find that our system not only automates the grading process but also enhances the performance and efficiency of human graders, particularly for essays where the model has lower confidence. These results highlight the potential of LLMs to facilitate effective human-AI collaboration in the educational context, potentially transforming learning experiences through AI-generated feedback.

Related papers

• Self-Evolved Reward Learning for LLMs [45.6910747154447]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is a crucial technique for aligning language models with human preferences. We propose Self-Evolved Reward Learning (SER), a novel approach where the RM generates additional training data to iteratively improve itself. Our results demonstrate that even with limited human-annotated data, learning from self-feedback can robustly enhance RM performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T07:29:03Z)
• Students Rather Than Experts: A New AI For Education Pipeline To Model More Human-Like And Personalised Early Adolescences [11.576679362717478]
  This study focuses on language learning as a context for modeling virtual student agents. By curating a dataset of personalized teacher-student interactions with various personality traits, we conduct multi-dimensional evaluation experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T07:18:24Z)
• Model-in-the-Loop (MILO): Accelerating Multimodal AI Data Annotation with LLMs [19.331803578031188]
  We propose the Model-in-the-Loop (MILO) framework, which integrates AI/ML models into the annotation process. Our research introduces a collaborative paradigm that leverages the strengths of both professional human annotators and large language models (LLMs) Three empirical studies on multimodal data annotation demonstrate MILO's efficacy in reducing handling time, improving data quality, and enhancing annotator experiences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T20:05:57Z)
• Evaluating the Impact of Advanced LLM Techniques on AI-Lecture Tutors for a Robotics Course [0.35132421583441026]
  This study evaluates the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) as an Artificial Intelligence-based tutor for a university course. In particular, different advanced techniques are utilized, such as prompt engineering, Retrieval-Augmented-Generation (RAG), and fine-tuning. Our findings indicate that RAG combined with prompt engineering significantly enhances model responses and produces better factual answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T19:49:19Z)
• CoMMIT: Coordinated Instruction Tuning for Multimodal Large Language Models [68.64605538559312]
  In this paper, we analyze the MLLM instruction tuning from both theoretical and empirical perspectives. Inspired by our findings, we propose a measurement to quantitatively evaluate the learning balance. In addition, we introduce an auxiliary loss regularization method to promote updating of the generation distribution of MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-29T23:18:55Z)
• LLMs Could Autonomously Learn Without External Supervision [36.36147944680502]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have traditionally been tethered to human-annotated datasets and predefined training objectives. This paper presents a transformative approach: Autonomous Learning for LLMs. This method endows LLMs with the ability to self-educate through direct interaction with text, akin to a human reading and comprehending literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-02T03:36:37Z)
• SALMON: Self-Alignment with Instructable Reward Models [80.83323636730341]
  This paper presents a novel approach, namely SALMON, to align base language models with minimal human supervision. We develop an AI assistant named Dromedary-2 with only 6 exemplars for in-context learning and 31 human-defined principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T17:56:53Z)
• Improving Open Information Extraction with Large Language Models: A Study on Demonstration Uncertainty [52.72790059506241]
  Open Information Extraction (OIE) task aims at extracting structured facts from unstructured text. Despite the potential of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT as a general task solver, they lag behind state-of-the-art (supervised) methods in OIE tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-07T01:35:24Z)
• Aligning Large Language Models with Human: A Survey [53.6014921995006]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) trained on extensive textual corpora have emerged as leading solutions for a broad array of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. Despite their notable performance, these models are prone to certain limitations such as misunderstanding human instructions, generating potentially biased content, or factually incorrect information. This survey presents a comprehensive overview of these alignment technologies, including the following aspects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-24T17:44:58Z)
• LAMM: Language-Assisted Multi-Modal Instruction-Tuning Dataset, Framework, and Benchmark [81.42376626294812]
  We present Language-Assisted Multi-Modal instruction tuning dataset, framework, and benchmark. Our aim is to establish LAMM as a growing ecosystem for training and evaluating MLLMs. We present a comprehensive dataset and benchmark, which cover a wide range of vision tasks for 2D and 3D vision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-11T14:01:17Z)
• On Learning to Summarize with Large Language Models as References [101.79795027550959]
  Large language models (LLMs) are favored by human annotators over the original reference summaries in commonly used summarization datasets. We study an LLM-as-reference learning setting for smaller text summarization models to investigate whether their performance can be substantially improved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T16:56:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.