How do machines learn? Evaluating the AIcon2abs method

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.07386v3
• Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 15:57:40 GMT
• Title: How do machines learn? Evaluating the AIcon2abs method
• Authors: Rubens Lacerda Queiroz, Cabral Lima, Fabio Ferrentini Sampaio, Priscila Machado Vieira Lima,
• Abstract summary: This paper evaluates AI from concrete to Abstract (AIcon2abs), a recently proposed method that enables awareness among the general public on machine learning. The WiSARD model does not require an Internet connection for training and classification, and it can learn from a few or one example. The AIcon2abs method's effectiveness was assessed through the evaluation of a remote course with a workload of approximately 6 hours.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper evaluates AI from concrete to Abstract (AIcon2abs), a recently proposed method that enables awareness among the general public on machine learning. Such is possible due to the use of WiSARD, an easily understandable machine learning mechanism, thus requiring little effort and no technical background from the target users. WiSARD is adherent to digital computing; training consists of writing to RAM-type memories, and classification consists of reading from these memories. The model enables easy visualization and understanding of training and classification tasks' internal realization through ludic activities. Furthermore, the WiSARD model does not require an Internet connection for training and classification, and it can learn from a few or one example. WiSARD can also create "mental images" of what it has learned so far, evidencing key features pertaining to a given class. The AIcon2abs method's effectiveness was assessed through the evaluation of a remote course with a workload of approximately 6 hours. It was completed by thirty-four Brazilian subjects: 5 children between 8 and 11 years old; 5 adolescents between 12 and 17 years old; and 24 adults between 21 and 72 years old. The collected data was analyzed from two perspectives: (i) from the perspective of a pre-experiment (of a mixed methods nature) and (ii) from a phenomenological perspective (of a qualitative nature). AIcon2abs was well-rated by almost 100% of the research subjects, and the data collected revealed quite satisfactory results concerning the intended outcomes. This research has been approved by the CEP/HUCFF/FM/UFRJ Human Research Ethics Committee.

Related papers

• User-centric evaluation of explainability of AI with and for humans: a comprehensive empirical study [5.775094401949666]
  This study is located in the Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HCAI) It focuses on the results of a user-centered assessment of commonly used eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T12:32:39Z)
• ExACT: Teaching AI Agents to Explore with Reflective-MCTS and Exploratory Learning [78.42927884000673]
  ExACT is an approach to combine test-time search and self-learning to build o1-like models for agentic applications. We first introduce Reflective Monte Carlo Tree Search (R-MCTS), a novel test time algorithm designed to enhance AI agents' ability to explore decision space on the fly. Next, we introduce Exploratory Learning, a novel learning strategy to teach agents to search at inference time without relying on any external search algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T21:42:35Z)
• Detecting Unsuccessful Students in Cybersecurity Exercises in Two Different Learning Environments [0.37729165787434493]
  This paper develops automated tools to predict when a student is having difficulty. In a potential application, such models can aid instructors in detecting struggling students and providing targeted help.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T04:57:54Z)
• Adversarial Machine Unlearning [26.809123658470693]
  This paper focuses on the challenge of machine unlearning, aiming to remove the influence of specific training data on machine learning models. Traditionally, the development of unlearning algorithms runs parallel with that of membership inference attacks (MIA), a type of privacy threat. We propose a game-theoretic framework that integrates MIAs into the design of unlearning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T20:07:22Z)
• Learning Manipulation by Predicting Interaction [85.57297574510507]
  We propose a general pre-training pipeline that learns Manipulation by Predicting the Interaction. The experimental results demonstrate that MPI exhibits remarkable improvement by 10% to 64% compared with previous state-of-the-art in real-world robot platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-01T13:28:31Z)
• OpenHEXAI: An Open-Source Framework for Human-Centered Evaluation of Explainable Machine Learning [43.87507227859493]
  This paper presents OpenHEXAI, an open-source framework for human-centered evaluation of XAI methods. OpenHEAXI is the first large-scale infrastructural effort to facilitate human-centered benchmarks of XAI methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T22:17:59Z)
• Is my Data in your AI Model? Membership Inference Test with Application to Face Images [18.402616111394842]
  This article introduces the Membership Inference Test (MINT), a novel approach that aims to empirically assess if given data was used during the training of AI/ML models. We propose two MINT architectures designed to learn the distinct activation patterns that emerge when an Audited Model is exposed to data used during its training process. Experiments are carried out using six publicly available databases, comprising over 22 million face images in total.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T15:09:01Z)
• RLIF: Interactive Imitation Learning as Reinforcement Learning [56.997263135104504]
  We show how off-policy reinforcement learning can enable improved performance under assumptions that are similar but potentially even more practical than those of interactive imitation learning. Our proposed method uses reinforcement learning with user intervention signals themselves as rewards. This relaxes the assumption that intervening experts in interactive imitation learning should be near-optimal and enables the algorithm to learn behaviors that improve over the potential suboptimal human expert.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-21T21:05:21Z)
• Deep Learning-based Spatio Temporal Facial Feature Visual Speech Recognition [0.0]
  We present an alternate authentication process that makes use of both facial recognition and the individual's distinctive temporal facial feature motions while they speak a password. The suggested model attained an accuracy of 96.1% when tested on the industry-standard MIRACL-VC1 dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-30T18:52:29Z)
• Human-Centric Multimodal Machine Learning: Recent Advances and Testbed on AI-based Recruitment [66.91538273487379]
  There is a certain consensus about the need to develop AI applications with a Human-Centric approach. Human-Centric Machine Learning needs to be developed based on four main requirements: (i) utility and social good; (ii) privacy and data ownership; (iii) transparency and accountability; and (iv) fairness in AI-driven decision-making processes. We study how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-13T16:44:44Z)
• ALBench: A Framework for Evaluating Active Learning in Object Detection [102.81795062493536]
  This paper contributes an active learning benchmark framework named as ALBench for evaluating active learning in object detection. Developed on an automatic deep model training system, this ALBench framework is easy-to-use, compatible with different active learning algorithms, and ensures the same training and testing protocols.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-27T07:46:23Z)
• Dissecting Self-Supervised Learning Methods for Surgical Computer Vision [51.370873913181605]
  Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) methods have begun to gain traction in the general computer vision community. The effectiveness of SSL methods in more complex and impactful domains, such as medicine and surgery, remains limited and unexplored. We present an extensive analysis of the performance of these methods on the Cholec80 dataset for two fundamental and popular tasks in surgical context understanding, phase recognition and tool presence detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-01T14:17:11Z)
• Let's Go to the Alien Zoo: Introducing an Experimental Framework to Study Usability of Counterfactual Explanations for Machine Learning [6.883906273999368]
  Counterfactual explanations (CFEs) have gained traction as a psychologically grounded approach to generate post-hoc explanations. We introduce the Alien Zoo, an engaging, web-based and game-inspired experimental framework. As a proof of concept, we demonstrate the practical efficacy and feasibility of this approach in a user study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-06T17:57:05Z)
• Few-Cost Salient Object Detection with Adversarial-Paced Learning [95.0220555274653]
  This paper proposes to learn the effective salient object detection model based on the manual annotation on a few training images only. We name this task as the few-cost salient object detection and propose an adversarial-paced learning (APL)-based framework to facilitate the few-cost learning scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-05T14:15:49Z)
• Personalized Education in the AI Era: What to Expect Next? [76.37000521334585]
  The objective of personalized learning is to design an effective knowledge acquisition track that matches the learner's strengths and bypasses her weaknesses to meet her desired goal. In recent years, the boost of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has unfolded novel perspectives to enhance personalized education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-19T12:23:32Z)
• NavRep: Unsupervised Representations for Reinforcement Learning of Robot Navigation in Dynamic Human Environments [28.530962677406627]
  We train two end-to-end, and 18 unsupervised-learning-based architectures, and compare them, along with existing approaches, in unseen test cases. Our results show that unsupervised learning methods are competitive with end-to-end methods. This release also includes OpenAI-gym-compatible environments designed to emulate the training conditions described by other papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-08T12:51:14Z)
• On the Marginal Benefit of Active Learning: Does Self-Supervision Eat Its Cake? [31.563514432259897]
  We present a novel framework integrating self-supervised pretraining, active learning, and consistency-regularized self-training. Our experiments reveal two key insights: (i) Self-supervised pre-training significantly improves semi-supervised learning, especially in the few-label regime. We fail to observe any additional benefit of state-of-the-art active learning algorithms when combined with state-of-the-art S4L techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-16T17:34:55Z)
• Unsupervised Multi-Modal Representation Learning for Affective Computing with Multi-Corpus Wearable Data [16.457778420360537]
  We propose an unsupervised framework to reduce the reliance on human supervision. The proposed framework utilizes two stacked convolutional autoencoders to learn latent representations from wearable electrocardiogram (ECG) and electrodermal activity (EDA) signals. Our method outperforms current state-of-the-art results that have performed arousal detection on the same datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-24T22:01:55Z)
• A robot that counts like a child: a developmental model of counting and pointing [69.26619423111092]
  A novel neuro-robotics model capable of counting real items is introduced. The model allows us to investigate the interaction between embodiment and numerical cognition. The trained model is able to count a set of items and at the same time points to them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-05T21:06:27Z)
• Symbiotic Adversarial Learning for Attribute-based Person Search [86.7506832053208]
  We present a symbiotic adversarial learning framework, called SAL.Two GANs sit at the base of the framework in a symbiotic learning scheme. Specifically, two different types of generative adversarial networks learn collaboratively throughout the training process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-19T07:24:45Z)
• Omni-supervised Facial Expression Recognition via Distilled Data [120.11782405714234]
  We propose omni-supervised learning to exploit reliable samples in a large amount of unlabeled data for network training. We experimentally verify that the new dataset can significantly improve the ability of the learned FER model. To tackle this, we propose to apply a dataset distillation strategy to compress the created dataset into several informative class-wise images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-18T09:36:51Z)
• Explainable Active Learning (XAL): An Empirical Study of How Local Explanations Impact Annotator Experience [76.9910678786031]
  We propose a novel paradigm of explainable active learning (XAL), by introducing techniques from the recently surging field of explainable AI (XAI) into an Active Learning setting. Our study shows benefits of AI explanation as interfaces for machine teaching--supporting trust calibration and enabling rich forms of teaching feedback, and potential drawbacks--anchoring effect with the model judgment and cognitive workload.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-24T22:52:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.