A Study on Large Language Models' Limitations in Multiple-Choice Question Answering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.07955v2
• Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 02:18:08 GMT
• Title: A Study on Large Language Models' Limitations in Multiple-Choice Question Answering
• Authors: Aisha Khatun, Daniel G. Brown,
• Abstract summary: We analyze 26 small open-source models and find that 65% of the models do not understand the task. Only 4 models properly select an answer from the given choices, and only 5 of these models are choice order independent.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The widespread adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) has become commonplace, particularly with the emergence of open-source models. More importantly, smaller models are well-suited for integration into consumer devices and are frequently employed either as standalone solutions or as subroutines in various AI tasks. Despite their ubiquitous use, there is no systematic analysis of their specific capabilities and limitations. In this study, we tackle one of the most widely used tasks - answering Multiple Choice Question (MCQ). We analyze 26 small open-source models and find that 65% of the models do not understand the task, only 4 models properly select an answer from the given choices, and only 5 of these models are choice order independent. These results are rather alarming given the extensive use of MCQ tests with these models. We recommend exercising caution and testing task understanding before using MCQ to evaluate LLMs in any field whatsoever.

Related papers

• Differentiating Choices via Commonality for Multiple-Choice Question Answering [54.04315943420376]
  Multiple-choice question answering can provide valuable clues for choosing the right answer. Existing models often rank each choice separately, overlooking the context provided by other choices. We propose a novel model by differentiating choices through identifying and eliminating their commonality, called DCQA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T12:05:21Z)
• Multi-LLM QA with Embodied Exploration [55.581423861790945]
  We investigate the use of Multi-Embodied LLM Explorers (MELE) for question-answering in an unknown environment. Multiple LLM-based agents independently explore and then answer queries about a household environment. We analyze different aggregation methods to generate a single, final answer for each query.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T12:46:40Z)
• Replacing Judges with Juries: Evaluating LLM Generations with a Panel of Diverse Models [56.02275285521847]
  We propose to evaluate models using a Panel of LLm evaluators (PoLL) We find that using a PoLL composed of a larger number of smaller models outperforms a single large judge, exhibits less intra-model bias due to its composition of disjoint model families, and does so while being over seven times less expensive.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T15:33:23Z)
• Improving the Capabilities of Large Language Model Based Marketing Analytics Copilots With Semantic Search And Fine-Tuning [0.9787137564521711]
  We show how a combination of semantic search, prompt engineering, and fine-tuning can be applied to dramatically improve the ability of LLMs to execute these tasks accurately. We compare both proprietary models, like GPT-4, and open-source models, like Llama-2-70b, as well as various embedding methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T03:39:16Z)
• Towards Robust Multi-Modal Reasoning via Model Selection [7.6621866737827045]
  LLM serves as the "brain" of the agent, orchestrating multiple tools for collaborative multi-step task solving. We propose the $textitM3$ framework as a plug-in with negligible runtime overhead at test-time. Our experiments reveal that our framework enables dynamic model selection, considering both user inputs and subtask dependencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T16:06:18Z)
• Getting MoRE out of Mixture of Language Model Reasoning Experts [71.61176122960464]
  We propose a Mixture-of-Reasoning-Experts (MoRE) framework that ensembles diverse specialized language models. We specialize the backbone language model with prompts optimized for different reasoning categories, including factual, multihop, mathematical, and commonsense reasoning. Our human study confirms that presenting expert predictions and the answer selection process helps annotators more accurately calibrate when to trust the system's output.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T02:00:51Z)
• Specializing Smaller Language Models towards Multi-Step Reasoning [56.78474185485288]
  We show that abilities can be distilled down from GPT-3.5 ($ge$ 175B) to T5 variants ($le$ 11B) We propose model specialization, to specialize the model's ability towards a target task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-30T08:51:19Z)
• ManyModalQA: Modality Disambiguation and QA over Diverse Inputs [73.93607719921945]
  We present a new multimodal question answering challenge, ManyModalQA, in which an agent must answer a question by considering three distinct modalities. We collect our data by scraping Wikipedia and then utilize crowdsourcing to collect question-answer pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-22T14:39:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.