Custom Developer GPT for Ethical AI Solutions
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.11013v1
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 20:21:46 GMT
- Title: Custom Developer GPT for Ethical AI Solutions
- Authors: Lauren Olson
- Abstract summary: This project aims to create a custom Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) for developers to discuss and solve ethical issues through AI engineering.
The use of such a tool can allow practitioners to engineer AI solutions which meet legal requirements and satisfy diverse ethical perspectives.
- Score: 1.2691047660244337
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The main goal of this project is to create a new software artefact: a custom
Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) for developers to discuss and solve
ethical issues through AI engineering. This conversational agent will provide
developers with practical application on (1) how to comply with legal
frameworks which regard AI systems (like the EU AI Act~\cite{aiact} and
GDPR~\cite{gdpr}) and (2) present alternate ethical perspectives to allow
developers to understand and incorporate alternate moral positions. In this
paper, we provide motivation for the need of such an agent, detail our idea and
demonstrate a use case. The use of such a tool can allow practitioners to
engineer AI solutions which meet legal requirements and satisfy diverse ethical
perspectives.
Related papers
- Using AI Alignment Theory to understand the potential pitfalls of regulatory frameworks [55.2480439325792]
This paper critically examines the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act)
Uses insights from Alignment Theory (AT) research, which focuses on the potential pitfalls of technical alignment in Artificial Intelligence.
As we apply these concepts to the EU AI Act, we uncover potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement in the regulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-10T17:38:38Z) - The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistants [53.89899371095332]
This paper focuses on the opportunities and the ethical and societal risks posed by advanced AI assistants.
We define advanced AI assistants as artificial agents with natural language interfaces, whose function is to plan and execute sequences of actions on behalf of a user.
We consider the deployment of advanced assistants at a societal scale, focusing on cooperation, equity and access, misinformation, economic impact, the environment and how best to evaluate advanced AI assistants.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-24T23:18:46Z) - Investigating and Designing for Trust in AI-powered Code Generation Tools [15.155301866886647]
We interviewed developers to understand their challenges in building appropriate trust in AI code generation tools.
We conducted a design probe study to explore design concepts that support developers' trust-building process.
These findings inform our proposed design recommendations on how to design for trust in AI-powered code generation tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-18T18:23:51Z) - Seamful XAI: Operationalizing Seamful Design in Explainable AI [59.89011292395202]
Mistakes in AI systems are inevitable, arising from both technical limitations and sociotechnical gaps.
We propose that seamful design can foster AI explainability by revealing sociotechnical and infrastructural mismatches.
We explore this process with 43 AI practitioners and real end-users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-12T21:54:05Z) - Enabling Automated Machine Learning for Model-Driven AI Engineering [60.09869520679979]
We propose a novel approach to enable Model-Driven Software Engineering and Model-Driven AI Engineering.
In particular, we support Automated ML, thus assisting software engineers without deep AI knowledge in developing AI-intensive systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-06T10:12:56Z) - Artificial Intelligence Ethics and Safety: practical tools for creating
"good" models [0.0]
The AI Robotics Ethics Society (AIRES) is a non-profit organization founded in 2018 by Aaron Hui.
AIRES is now an organization with chapters at universities such as UCLA (Los Angeles), USC (University of Southern California), Caltech (California Institute of Technology), Stanford University, Cornell University, Brown University, and the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-14T19:10:05Z) - An Ethical Framework for Guiding the Development of Affectively-Aware
Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
We propose guidelines for evaluating the (moral and) ethical consequences of affectively-aware AI.
We propose a multi-stakeholder analysis framework that separates the ethical responsibilities of AI Developers vis-a-vis the entities that deploy such AI.
We end with recommendations for researchers, developers, operators, as well as regulators and law-makers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-29T03:57:53Z) - Empowered and Embedded: Ethics and Agile Processes [60.63670249088117]
We argue that ethical considerations need to be embedded into the (agile) software development process.
We put emphasis on the possibility to implement ethical deliberations in already existing and well established agile software development processes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-15T11:14:03Z) - An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive
qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence.
The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z) - Ethics as a service: a pragmatic operationalisation of AI Ethics [1.1083289076967895]
gap exists between theory of AI ethics principles and the practical design of AI systems.
This is the question we seek to address here by exploring why principles and technical translational tools are still needed even if they are limited.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-11T21:29:25Z) - Time for AI (Ethics) Maturity Model Is Now [15.870654219935972]
This paper argues that AI software is still software and needs to be approached from the software development perspective.
We wish to discuss whether the focus should be on AI ethics or, more broadly, the quality of an AI system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-29T17:37:44Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.