From GPT-4 to Gemini and Beyond: Assessing the Landscape of MLLMs on Generalizability, Trustworthiness and Causality through Four Modalities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.15071v2
• Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:18:45 GMT
• Title: From GPT-4 to Gemini and Beyond: Assessing the Landscape of MLLMs on Generalizability, Trustworthiness and Causality through Four Modalities
• Authors: Chaochao Lu, Chen Qian, Guodong Zheng, Hongxing Fan, Hongzhi Gao, Jie Zhang, Jing Shao, Jingyi Deng, Jinlan Fu, Kexin Huang, Kunchang Li, Lijun Li, Limin Wang, Lu Sheng, Meiqi Chen, Ming Zhang, Qibing Ren, Sirui Chen, Tao Gui, Wanli Ouyang, Yali Wang, Yan Teng, Yaru Wang, Yi Wang, Yinan He, Yingchun Wang, Yixu Wang, Yongting Zhang, Yu Qiao, Yujiong Shen, Yurong Mou, Yuxi Chen, Zaibin Zhang, Zhelun Shi, Zhenfei Yin, Zhipin Wang
• Abstract summary: We study the generalizability, trustworthiness, and causal reasoning capabilities of recent proprietary and open-source MLLMs across four modalities. We believe these properties are several representative factors that define the reliability of MLLMs. We uncover 14 empirical findings that are useful to understand the capabilities and limitations of both proprietary and open-source MLLMs.
• Score: 111.44485171421535
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown impressive abilities in generating reasonable responses with respect to multi-modal contents. However, there is still a wide gap between the performance of recent MLLM-based applications and the expectation of the broad public, even though the most powerful OpenAI's GPT-4 and Google's Gemini have been deployed. This paper strives to enhance understanding of the gap through the lens of a qualitative study on the generalizability, trustworthiness, and causal reasoning capabilities of recent proprietary and open-source MLLMs across four modalities: ie, text, code, image, and video, ultimately aiming to improve the transparency of MLLMs. We believe these properties are several representative factors that define the reliability of MLLMs, in supporting various downstream applications. To be specific, we evaluate the closed-source GPT-4 and Gemini and 6 open-source LLMs and MLLMs. Overall we evaluate 230 manually designed cases, where the qualitative results are then summarized into 12 scores (ie, 4 modalities times 3 properties). In total, we uncover 14 empirical findings that are useful to understand the capabilities and limitations of both proprietary and open-source MLLMs, towards more reliable downstream multi-modal applications.

Related papers

• FedMLLM: Federated Fine-tuning MLLM on Multimodal Heterogeneity Data [64.50893177169996]
  Fine-tuning Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) with Federated Learning (FL) allows for expanding the training data scope by including private data sources. We introduce a benchmark for evaluating various downstream tasks in the federated fine-tuning of MLLMs within multimodal heterogeneous scenarios. We develop a general FedMLLM framework that integrates four representative FL methods alongside two modality-agnostic strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-22T04:09:23Z)
• Understanding the Role of LLMs in Multimodal Evaluation Benchmarks [77.59035801244278]
  This paper investigates the role of the Large Language Model (LLM) backbone in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) evaluation. Our study encompasses four diverse MLLM benchmarks and eight state-of-the-art MLLMs. Key findings reveal that some benchmarks allow high performance even without visual inputs and up to 50% of error rates can be attributed to insufficient world knowledge in the LLM backbone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T07:49:13Z)
• A Survey on Benchmarks of Multimodal Large Language Models [65.87641718350639]
  This paper presents a comprehensive review of 200 benchmarks and evaluations for Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) We focus on (1)perception and understanding, (2)cognition and reasoning, (3)specific domains, (4)key capabilities, and (5)other modalities. Our key argument is that evaluation should be regarded as a crucial discipline to support the development of MLLMs better.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T09:52:02Z)
• Benchmarking Trustworthiness of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Study [51.19622266249408]
  MultiTrust is the first comprehensive and unified benchmark on the trustworthiness of MLLMs. Our benchmark employs a rigorous evaluation strategy that addresses both multimodal risks and cross-modal impacts. Extensive experiments with 21 modern MLLMs reveal some previously unexplored trustworthiness issues and risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T08:38:13Z)
• MLLM-as-a-Judge: Assessing Multimodal LLM-as-a-Judge with Vision-Language Benchmark [41.68821233828375]
  This paper introduces a novel benchmark, termed MLLM-as-a-Judge, to assess the ability of MLLMs in assisting judges across diverse modalities. Our study reveals that, while MLLMs demonstrate remarkable human-like discernment in Pair Comparison, there is a significant divergence from human preferences in Scoring Evaluation and Batch Ranking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T12:28:32Z)
• SEED-Bench-2: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models [67.28089415198338]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have recently demonstrated exceptional capabilities in generating not only texts but also images given interleaved multimodal inputs. SEED-Bench-2 comprises 24K multiple-choice questions with accurate human annotations, which spans 27 dimensions. We evaluate the performance of 23 prominent open-source MLLMs and summarize valuable observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T05:53:55Z)
• Towards End-to-End Embodied Decision Making via Multi-modal Large Language Model: Explorations with GPT4-Vision and Beyond [38.85644950457275]
  We investigate whether state-of-the-art MLLMs can handle embodied decision-making in an end-to-end manner. Our results indicate that powerful MLLMs like GPT4-Vision hold promise for decision-making in embodied agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T14:13:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.