Beyond Eviction Prediction: Leveraging Local Spatiotemporal Public Records to Inform Action

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16440v1
• Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 09:29:11 GMT
• Title: Beyond Eviction Prediction: Leveraging Local Spatiotemporal Public Records to Inform Action
• Authors: Tasfia Mashiat, Alex DiChristofano, Patrick J. Fowler, Sanmay Das
• Abstract summary: We perform an eviction prediction task to produce risk scores and then use these risk scores to plan targeted outreach policies. We show that the risk scores are, in fact, useful, enabling a theoretical team of caseworkers to reach more eviction-prone properties in the same amount of time. We also discuss the importance of neighborhood and ownership features in both risk prediction and targeted outreach.
• Score: 11.183319154396369
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: There has been considerable recent interest in scoring properties on the basis of eviction risk. The success of methods for eviction prediction is typically evaluated using different measures of predictive accuracy. However, the underlying goal of such prediction is to direct appropriate assistance to households that may be at greater risk so they remain stably housed. Thus, we must ask the question of how useful such predictions are in targeting outreach efforts - informing action. In this paper, we investigate this question using a novel dataset that matches information on properties, evictions, and owners. We perform an eviction prediction task to produce risk scores and then use these risk scores to plan targeted outreach policies. We show that the risk scores are, in fact, useful, enabling a theoretical team of caseworkers to reach more eviction-prone properties in the same amount of time, compared to outreach policies that are either neighborhood-based or focus on buildings with a recent history of evictions. We also discuss the importance of neighborhood and ownership features in both risk prediction and targeted outreach.

Related papers

• Survival Models: Proper Scoring Rule and Stochastic Optimization with Competing Risks [6.9648613217501705]
  SurvivalBoost outperforms 12 state-of-the-art models on 4 real-life datasets. It provides great calibration, the ability to predict across any time horizon, and computation times faster than existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T07:33:34Z)
• Performative Prediction on Games and Mechanism Design [69.7933059664256]
  We study a collective risk dilemma where agents decide whether to trust predictions based on past accuracy. As predictions shape collective outcomes, social welfare arises naturally as a metric of concern. We show how to achieve better trade-offs and use them for mechanism design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-09T16:03:44Z)
• Score Matching-based Pseudolikelihood Estimation of Neural Marked Spatio-Temporal Point Process with Uncertainty Quantification [59.81904428056924]
  We introduce SMASH: a Score MAtching estimator for learning markedPs with uncertainty quantification. Specifically, our framework adopts a normalization-free objective by estimating the pseudolikelihood of markedPs through score-matching. The superior performance of our proposed framework is demonstrated through extensive experiments in both event prediction and uncertainty quantification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T02:37:51Z)
• Streaming Motion Forecasting for Autonomous Driving [71.7468645504988]
  We introduce a benchmark that queries future trajectories on streaming data and we refer to it as "streaming forecasting" Our benchmark inherently captures the disappearance and re-appearance of agents, which is a safety-critical problem yet overlooked by snapshot-based benchmarks. We propose a plug-and-play meta-algorithm called "Predictive Streamer" that can adapt any snapshot-based forecaster into a streaming forecaster.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T17:13:16Z)
• Proper Scoring Rules for Survival Analysis [0.07614628596146598]
  We investigate extensions of four major strictly proper scoring rules for survival analysis. We prove that these extensions are proper under certain conditions, which arise from the discretization of the estimation of probability distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-01T01:50:24Z)
• Dwelling Type Classification for Disaster Risk Assessment Using Satellite Imagery [3.88838725116957]
  Vulnerability and risk assessment of neighborhoods is essential for effective disaster preparedness. Existing traditional systems, due to dependency on time-consuming and cost-intensive field surveying, do not provide a scalable way to decipher warnings and assess the precise extent of the risk at a hyper-local level. In this work, machine learning was used to automate the process of identifying dwellings and their type to build a potentially more effective disaster vulnerability assessment system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-16T03:08:15Z)
• What Should I Know? Using Meta-gradient Descent for Predictive Feature Discovery in a Single Stream of Experience [63.75363908696257]
  computational reinforcement learning seeks to construct an agent's perception of the world through predictions of future sensations. An open challenge in this line of work is determining from the infinitely many predictions that the agent could possibly make which predictions might best support decision-making. We introduce a meta-gradient descent process by which an agent learns what predictions to make, 2) the estimates for its chosen predictions, and 3) how to use those estimates to generate policies that maximize future reward.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-13T21:31:06Z)
• Visual Perception of Building and Household Vulnerability from Streets [0.294944680995069]
  In developing countries, building codes often are outdated or not enforced. A large portion of the housing stock is substandard and vulnerable to natural hazards and climate related events. We propose an evaluation framework that is cost-efficient for first capture and future updates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-28T15:35:47Z)
• The Impact of Algorithmic Risk Assessments on Human Predictions and its Analysis via Crowdsourcing Studies [79.66833203975729]
  We conduct a vignette study in which laypersons are tasked with predicting future re-arrests. Our key findings are as follows: Participants often predict that an offender will be rearrested even when they deem the likelihood of re-arrest to be well below 50%. Judicial decisions, unlike participants' predictions, depend in part on factors that are to the likelihood of re-arrest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-03T11:09:10Z)
• Unifying Lower Bounds on Prediction Dimension of Consistent Convex Surrogates [12.751555473216683]
  Given a prediction task, understanding when one can and cannot design a consistent convex surrogate loss is an important area of machine learning research. We unify these settings using tools from property elicitation, and give a general lower bound on prediction dimension. Our lower bound tightens existing results in the case of discrete predictions, showing that previous calibration-based bounds can largely be recovered via property elicitation. For continuous estimation, our lower bound resolves on open problem on estimating measures of risk and uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-16T15:29:05Z)
• Survival Cluster Analysis [93.50540270973927]
  There is an unmet need in survival analysis for identifying subpopulations with distinct risk profiles. An approach that addresses this need is likely to improve characterization of individual outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-29T22:41:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.