Credit Risk Meets Large Language Models: Building a Risk Indicator from Loan Descriptions in P2P Lending
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16458v2
- Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 07:59:19 GMT
- Title: Credit Risk Meets Large Language Models: Building a Risk Indicator from Loan Descriptions in P2P Lending
- Authors: Mario Sanz-Guerrero, Javier Arroyo,
- Abstract summary: Peer-to-peer (P2P) lending has emerged as a distinctive financing mechanism, linking borrowers with lenders through online platforms.
However, P2P lending faces the challenge of information asymmetry, as lenders often lack sufficient data to assess the creditworthiness of borrowers.
This paper proposes a novel approach to address this issue by leveraging the textual descriptions provided by borrowers during the loan application process.
- Score: 1.1970409518725493
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Peer-to-peer (P2P) lending has emerged as a distinctive financing mechanism, linking borrowers with lenders through online platforms. However, P2P lending faces the challenge of information asymmetry, as lenders often lack sufficient data to assess the creditworthiness of borrowers. This paper proposes a novel approach to address this issue by leveraging the textual descriptions provided by borrowers during the loan application process. Our methodology involves processing these textual descriptions using a Large Language Model (LLM), a powerful tool capable of discerning patterns and semantics within the text. Transfer learning is applied to adapt the LLM to the specific task at hand. Our results derived from the analysis of the Lending Club dataset show that the risk score generated by BERT, a widely used LLM, significantly improves the performance of credit risk classifiers. However, the inherent opacity of LLM-based systems, coupled with uncertainties about potential biases, underscores critical considerations for regulatory frameworks and engenders trust-related concerns among end-users, opening new avenues for future research in the dynamic landscape of P2P lending and artificial intelligence.
Related papers
- MoRE-LLM: Mixture of Rule Experts Guided by a Large Language Model [54.14155564592936]
We propose a Mixture of Rule Experts guided by a Large Language Model (MoRE-LLM)
MoRE-LLM steers the discovery of local rule-based surrogates during training and their utilization for the classification task.
LLM is responsible for enhancing the domain knowledge alignment of the rules by correcting and contextualizing them.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-26T11:09:21Z) - VinePPO: Unlocking RL Potential For LLM Reasoning Through Refined Credit Assignment [66.80143024475635]
We propose VinePPO, a straightforward approach to compute unbiased Monte Carlo-based estimates.
We show that VinePPO consistently outperforms PPO and other RL-free baselines across MATH and GSM8K datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-02T15:49:30Z) - Exploring Automatic Cryptographic API Misuse Detection in the Era of LLMs [60.32717556756674]
This paper introduces a systematic evaluation framework to assess Large Language Models in detecting cryptographic misuses.
Our in-depth analysis of 11,940 LLM-generated reports highlights that the inherent instabilities in LLMs can lead to over half of the reports being false positives.
The optimized approach achieves a remarkable detection rate of nearly 90%, surpassing traditional methods and uncovering previously unknown misuses in established benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-23T15:31:26Z) - TRACE: TRansformer-based Attribution using Contrastive Embeddings in LLMs [50.259001311894295]
We propose a novel TRansformer-based Attribution framework using Contrastive Embeddings called TRACE.
We show that TRACE significantly improves the ability to attribute sources accurately, making it a valuable tool for enhancing the reliability and trustworthiness of large language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-06T07:19:30Z) - Benchmarking Trustworthiness of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Study [51.19622266249408]
MultiTrust is the first comprehensive and unified benchmark on the trustworthiness of MLLMs.
Our benchmark employs a rigorous evaluation strategy that addresses both multimodal risks and cross-modal impacts.
Extensive experiments with 21 modern MLLMs reveal some previously unexplored trustworthiness issues and risks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-11T08:38:13Z) - CLAMBER: A Benchmark of Identifying and Clarifying Ambiguous Information Needs in Large Language Models [60.59638232596912]
We introduce CLAMBER, a benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs)
Building upon the taxonomy, we construct 12K high-quality data to assess the strengths, weaknesses, and potential risks of various off-the-shelf LLMs.
Our findings indicate the limited practical utility of current LLMs in identifying and clarifying ambiguous user queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-20T14:34:01Z) - Empowering Many, Biasing a Few: Generalist Credit Scoring through Large
Language Models [53.620827459684094]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have great potential for credit scoring tasks, with strong generalization ability across multiple tasks.
We propose the first open-source comprehensive framework for exploring LLMs for credit scoring.
We then propose the first Credit and Risk Assessment Large Language Model (CALM) by instruction tuning, tailored to the nuanced demands of various financial risk assessment tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-01T03:50:34Z) - Machine Learning Models Evaluation and Feature Importance Analysis on
NPL Dataset [0.0]
We evaluate how different Machine learning models perform on the dataset provided by a private bank in Ethiopia.
XGBoost achieves the highest F1 score on the KMeans SMOTE over-sampled data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-28T17:09:44Z) - Explaining Credit Risk Scoring through Feature Contribution Alignment
with Expert Risk Analysts [1.7778609937758323]
We focus on companies credit scoring and we benchmark different machine learning models.
The aim is to build a model to predict whether a company will experience financial problems in a given time horizon.
We bring light by providing an expert-aligned feature relevance score highlighting the disagreement between a credit risk expert and a model feature attribution explanation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-15T12:59:15Z) - Explainable AI in Credit Risk Management [0.0]
We implement two advanced explainability techniques called Local Interpretable Model Agnostic Explanations (LIME) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to machine learning (ML)-based credit scoring models.
Specifically, we use LIME to explain instances locally and SHAP to get both local and global explanations.
We discuss the results in detail and present multiple comparison scenarios by using various kernels available for explaining graphs generated using SHAP values.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-01T12:23:20Z) - Explanations of Machine Learning predictions: a mandatory step for its
application to Operational Processes [61.20223338508952]
Credit Risk Modelling plays a paramount role.
Recent machine and deep learning techniques have been applied to the task.
We suggest to use LIME technique to tackle the explainability problem in this field.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-30T10:27:59Z) - Explainable AI for Interpretable Credit Scoring [0.8379286663107844]
Credit scoring helps financial experts make better decisions regarding whether or not to accept a loan application.
Regulations have added the need for model interpretability to ensure that algorithmic decisions are understandable coherent.
We present a credit scoring model that is both accurate and interpretable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-03T18:44:03Z) - Improving Investment Suggestions for Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Lending via
Integrating Credit Scoring into Profit Scoring [6.245537312562826]
We propose a two-stage framework that incorporates the credit information into a profit scoring modeling.
We conducted the empirical experiment on a real-world P2P lending data from the US P2P market.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-09T19:41:23Z) - Determining Secondary Attributes for Credit Evaluation in P2P Lending [0.0]
We utilize machine learning classification and clustering algorithms to accurately predict a borrower's creditworthiness.
We achieved 65% F1 and 73% AUC on the LendingClub data while identifying key secondary attributes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-08T16:12:00Z) - Super-App Behavioral Patterns in Credit Risk Models: Financial,
Statistical and Regulatory Implications [110.54266632357673]
We present the impact of alternative data that originates from an app-based marketplace, in contrast to traditional bureau data, upon credit scoring models.
Our results, validated across two countries, show that these new sources of data are particularly useful for predicting financial behavior in low-wealth and young individuals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-09T01:32:03Z) - The value of text for small business default prediction: A deep learning
approach [9.023847175654602]
It is standard policy for a loan officer to provide a textual loan assessment to mitigate limited data availability.
We exploit recent advances from the field of Deep Learning and Natural Language Processing to extract information from 60 000 textual assessments provided by a lender.
We find that the text alone is surprisingly effective for predicting default, but when combined with traditional data, it yields no additional predictive capability.
Our proposed deep learning model does, however, appear to be robust to the quality of the text and therefore suitable for partly automating the mSME lending process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-19T18:15:05Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.