Related papers: Perceptions of Moderators as a Large-Scale Measure of Online Community Governance

Perceptions of Moderators as a Large-Scale Measure of Online Community Governance

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16610v3
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 01:19:03 GMT
Title: Perceptions of Moderators as a Large-Scale Measure of Online Community Governance
Authors: Galen Weld, Leon Leibmann, Amy X. Zhang, Tim Althoff,
Abstract summary: We label 1.89 million posts and comments made on reddit over an 18 month period. We identify types of communities where moderators are perceived particularly positively and negatively. We show that strict rule enforcement is linked to more favorable perceptions of moderators of communities dedicated to certain topics, such as news communities, than others.
Score: 13.80648276848838
License:
Abstract: Millions of online communities are governed by volunteer moderators, who shape their communities by setting and enforcing rules, recruiting additional moderators, and participating in the community themselves. These moderators must regularly make decisions about how to govern, yet measuring the 'success' of governance is complex and nuanced, making it challenging to determine what governance strategies are most successful. Furthermore, prior work has shown that communities have differing values, suggesting that 'one-size-fits-all' approaches to governance are unlikely to serve all communities well. In this work, we assess governance practices on reddit by classifying the sentiment of community members' public discussion of their own moderators. We label 1.89 million posts and comments made on reddit over an 18 month period. We relate these perceptions to characteristics of community governance, and to different actions that community moderators take. We identify types of communities where moderators are perceived particularly positively and negatively, and highlight promising strategies for moderator teams. Amongst other findings, we show that strict rule enforcement is linked to more favorable perceptions of moderators of communities dedicated to certain topics, such as news communities, than others. We investigate what kinds of moderators are associated with improved community perceptions upon their addition to a mod team, and find that moderators who are active community members before and during their mod tenures are seen more favorably. We make our models, anonymized datasets, and code public.

Related papers

Can Community Notes Replace Professional Fact-Checkers? [49.5332225129956]
Policy changes by Twitter/X and Meta signal a shift away from partnerships with fact-checking organisations. Our analysis reveals that community notes cite fact-checking sources up to five times more than previously reported.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-19T22:26:39Z)
Mapping the Spiral of Silence: Surveying Unspoken Opinions in Online Communities [60.695668356379684]
We examine the difference between the viewpoints publicly posted in a community and the privately surveyed viewpoints of community members. We find that 72.6% of participants who perceive themselves in the minority remain silent, and are only half as likely to post their viewpoint. These results emphasize how far out of step the opinions we see online may be with the population they purport to represent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-02T23:06:05Z)
Reddit Rules and Rulers: Quantifying the Link Between Rules and Perceptions of Governance across Thousands of Communities [13.80648276848838]
We conduct the largest-to-date analysis of rules on Reddit, collecting a set of 67,545 unique rules across 5,225 communities. More than just a point-in-time study, our work measures how communities change their rules over a 5+ year period. We are the first to identify the rules most strongly associated with positive community perceptions of governance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-24T01:26:41Z)
Post Guidance for Online Communities [11.475519304748891]
Post guidance guides users' contributions using rules that trigger interventions as users draft a post to be submitted. This uniquely community-specific, proactive, and user-centric approach can increase adherence to rules without imposing additional burdens on moderators.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-25T15:32:46Z)
Explainability and Hate Speech: Structured Explanations Make Social Media Moderators Faster [72.84926097773578]
We investigate the effect of explanations on the speed of real-world moderators. Our experiments show that while generic explanations do not affect their speed and are often ignored, structured explanations lower moderators' decision making time by 7.4%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-06T14:23:10Z)
Analyzing Norm Violations in Live-Stream Chat [49.120561596550395]
We study the first NLP study dedicated to detecting norm violations in conversations on live-streaming platforms. We define norm violation categories in live-stream chats and annotate 4,583 moderated comments from Twitch. Our results show that appropriate contextual information can boost moderation performance by 35%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-18T05:58:27Z)
Non-Polar Opposites: Analyzing the Relationship Between Echo Chambers and Hostile Intergroup Interactions on Reddit [66.09950457847242]
We study the activity of 5.97M Reddit users and 421M comments posted over 13 years. We create a typology of relationships between political communities based on whether their users are toxic to each other.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-25T22:17:07Z)
Governing for Free: Rule Process Effects on Reddit Moderator Motivations [0.0]
The over 2.8 million "subreddit" communities on Reddit are governed by hundreds of thousands of volunteer moderators, many of whom have no training or prior experience in a governing role. While moderators often devote daily time to community maintenance and cope with the emotional effects of hate comments or disturbing content, Reddit provides no compensation for this position. We investigate how the processes through which subreddit moderators generate community rules increase moderators' motivation through the meeting of social-psychological needs: Procedural Justice and Self Determination, and Self-Other Merging.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-11T23:23:38Z)
Governing online goods: Maturity and formalization in Minecraft, Reddit, and World of Warcraft communities [0.0]
Building a successful community means governing active populations and limited resources. This study applies institutional analysis frameworks to 80,000 communities across 3 platforms: the sandbox game Minecraft, the MMO game World of Warcraft, and Reddit. We find that online communities employ similar governance styles across platforms, strongly favoring "weak" norms to "strong" requirements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-02T22:45:21Z)
This Must Be the Place: Predicting Engagement of Online Communities in a Large-scale Distributed Campaign [70.69387048368849]
We study the behavior of communities with millions of active members. We develop a hybrid model, combining textual cues, community meta-data, and structural properties. We demonstrate the applicability of our model through Reddit's r/place a large-scale online experiment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-14T08:23:16Z)
What Makes Online Communities 'Better'? Measuring Values, Consensus, and Conflict across Thousands of Subreddits [13.585903247791094]
We measure community values through the first large-scale survey of community values, including 2,769 reddit users in 2,151 unique subreddits. We show that community members disagree about how safe their communities are, that longstanding communities place 30.1% more importance on trustworthiness than newer communities. These findings have important implications, including suggesting that care must be taken to protect vulnerable community members.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-10T18:31:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.