Exploring Spatial Schema Intuitions in Large Language and Vision Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.00956v2
• Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 14:29:31 GMT
• Title: Exploring Spatial Schema Intuitions in Large Language and Vision Models
• Authors: Philipp Wicke, Lennart Wachowiak,
• Abstract summary: We investigate whether large language models (LLMs) effectively capture implicit human intuitions about building blocks of language. Surprisingly, correlations between model outputs and human responses emerge, revealing adaptability without a tangible connection to embodied experiences. This research contributes to a nuanced understanding of the interplay between language, spatial experiences, and computations made by large language models.
• Score: 8.944921398608063
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Despite the ubiquity of large language models (LLMs) in AI research, the question of embodiment in LLMs remains underexplored, distinguishing them from embodied systems in robotics where sensory perception directly informs physical action. Our investigation navigates the intriguing terrain of whether LLMs, despite their non-embodied nature, effectively capture implicit human intuitions about fundamental, spatial building blocks of language. We employ insights from spatial cognitive foundations developed through early sensorimotor experiences, guiding our exploration through the reproduction of three psycholinguistic experiments. Surprisingly, correlations between model outputs and human responses emerge, revealing adaptability without a tangible connection to embodied experiences. Notable distinctions include polarized language model responses and reduced correlations in vision language models. This research contributes to a nuanced understanding of the interplay between language, spatial experiences, and the computations made by large language models. More at https://cisnlp.github.io/Spatial_Schemas/

Related papers

• Brain-Like Language Processing via a Shallow Untrained Multihead Attention Network [16.317199232071232]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have been shown to be effective models of the human language system. In this work, we investigate the key architectural components driving the surprising alignment of untrained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T12:54:03Z)
• Sharing Matters: Analysing Neurons Across Languages and Tasks in LLMs [70.3132264719438]
  We aim to fill the research gap by examining how neuron activation is shared across tasks and languages. We classify neurons into four distinct categories based on their responses to a specific input across different languages. Our analysis reveals the following insights: (i) the patterns of neuron sharing are significantly affected by the characteristics of tasks and examples; (ii) neuron sharing does not fully correspond with language similarity; (iii) shared neurons play a vital role in generating responses, especially those shared across all languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T16:04:11Z)
• Large language models as linguistic simulators and cognitive models in human research [0.0]
  The rise of large language models (LLMs) that generate human-like text has sparked debates over their potential to replace human participants in behavioral and cognitive research. We critically evaluate this replacement perspective to appraise the fundamental utility of language models in psychology and social science. This perspective reframes the role of language models in behavioral and cognitive science, serving as linguistic simulators and cognitive models that shed light on the similarities and differences between machine intelligence and human cognition and thoughts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T23:28:23Z)
• Causal Graph in Language Model Rediscovers Cortical Hierarchy in Human Narrative Processing [0.0]
  Previous studies have demonstrated that the features of language models can be mapped to fMRI brain activity. This raises the question: is there a commonality between information processing in language models and the human brain? To estimate information flow patterns in a language model, we examined the causal relationships between different layers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-17T10:09:12Z)
• Divergences between Language Models and Human Brains [63.405788999891335]
  Recent research has hinted that brain signals can be effectively predicted using internal representations of language models (LMs) We show that there are clear differences in how LMs and humans represent and use language. We identify two domains that are not captured well by LMs: social/emotional intelligence and physical commonsense.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T19:02:40Z)
• Interpreting Pretrained Language Models via Concept Bottlenecks [55.47515772358389]
  Pretrained language models (PLMs) have made significant strides in various natural language processing tasks. The lack of interpretability due to their black-box'' nature poses challenges for responsible implementation. We propose a novel approach to interpreting PLMs by employing high-level, meaningful concepts that are easily understandable for humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-08T20:41:18Z)
• Unveiling A Core Linguistic Region in Large Language Models [49.860260050718516]
  This paper conducts an analogical research using brain localization as a prototype. We have discovered a core region in large language models that corresponds to linguistic competence. We observe that an improvement in linguistic competence does not necessarily accompany an elevation in the model's knowledge level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T13:31:32Z)
• Transparency Helps Reveal When Language Models Learn Meaning [71.96920839263457]
  Our systematic experiments with synthetic data reveal that, with languages where all expressions have context-independent denotations, both autoregressive and masked language models learn to emulate semantic relations between expressions. Turning to natural language, our experiments with a specific phenomenon -- referential opacity -- add to the growing body of evidence that current language models do not well-represent natural language semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T02:35:19Z)
• Is the Computation of Abstract Sameness Relations Human-Like in Neural Language Models? [4.0810783261728565]
  This work explores whether state-of-the-art NLP models exhibit elementary mechanisms known from human cognition. The computation of "abstract sameness relations" is assumed to play an important role in human language acquisition and processing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-12T15:19:54Z)
• Model-based analysis of brain activity reveals the hierarchy of language in 305 subjects [82.81964713263483]
  A popular approach to decompose the neural bases of language consists in correlating, across individuals, the brain responses to different stimuli. Here, we show that a model-based approach can reach equivalent results within subjects exposed to natural stimuli.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-12T15:30:21Z)
• Crossmodal Language Grounding in an Embodied Neurocognitive Model [28.461246169379685]
  Human infants are able to acquire natural language seemingly easily at an early age. From a neuroscientific perspective, natural language is embodied, grounded in most, if not all, sensory and sensorimotor modalities. We present a neurocognitive model for language grounding which reflects bio-inspired mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-24T08:12:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.