Source-Free Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Hypothesis Consolidation of Prediction Rationale

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01157v1
• Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 05:53:22 GMT
• Title: Source-Free Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Hypothesis Consolidation of Prediction Rationale
• Authors: Yangyang Shu, Xiaofeng Cao, Qi Chen, Bowen Zhang, Ziqin Zhou, Anton van den Hengel, and Lingqiao Liu
• Abstract summary: Source-Free Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (SFUDA) is a challenging task where a model needs to be adapted to a new domain without access to target domain labels or source domain data. This paper proposes a novel approach that considers multiple prediction hypotheses for each sample and investigates the rationale behind each hypothesis. To achieve the optimal performance, we propose a three-step adaptation process: model pre-adaptation, hypothesis consolidation, and semi-supervised learning.
• Score: 53.152460508207184
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Source-Free Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (SFUDA) is a challenging task where a model needs to be adapted to a new domain without access to target domain labels or source domain data. The primary difficulty in this task is that the model's predictions may be inaccurate, and using these inaccurate predictions for model adaptation can lead to misleading results. To address this issue, this paper proposes a novel approach that considers multiple prediction hypotheses for each sample and investigates the rationale behind each hypothesis. By consolidating these hypothesis rationales, we identify the most likely correct hypotheses, which we then use as a pseudo-labeled set to support a semi-supervised learning procedure for model adaptation. To achieve the optimal performance, we propose a three-step adaptation process: model pre-adaptation, hypothesis consolidation, and semi-supervised learning. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance in the SFUDA task and can be easily integrated into existing approaches to improve their performance. The codes are available at \url{https://github.com/GANPerf/HCPR}.

Related papers

• Reconciling Model Multiplicity for Downstream Decision Making [24.335927243672952]
  We show that even when the two predictive models approximately agree on their individual predictions almost everywhere, it is still possible for their induced best-response actions to differ on a substantial portion of the population. We propose a framework that calibrates the predictive models with regard to both the downstream decision-making problem and the individual probability prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T03:36:46Z)
• Rejection via Learning Density Ratios [50.91522897152437]
  Classification with rejection emerges as a learning paradigm which allows models to abstain from making predictions. We propose a different distributional perspective, where we seek to find an idealized data distribution which maximizes a pretrained model's performance. Our framework is tested empirically over clean and noisy datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T01:32:17Z)
• Domain-Specific Risk Minimization for Out-of-Distribution Generalization [104.17683265084757]
  We first establish a generalization bound that explicitly considers the adaptivity gap. We propose effective gap estimation methods for guiding the selection of a better hypothesis for the target. The other method is minimizing the gap directly by adapting model parameters using online target samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-18T06:42:49Z)
• Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performance [63.740181251997306]
  Real-world machine learning deployments are characterized by mismatches between the source (training) and target (test) distributions. In this work, we investigate methods for predicting the target domain accuracy using only labeled source data and unlabeled target data. We propose Average Thresholded Confidence (ATC), a practical method that learns a threshold on the model's confidence, predicting accuracy as the fraction of unlabeled examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T23:01:12Z)
• MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentation [131.28104376280197]
  We study the problem of test time robustification, i.e., using the test input to improve model robustness. Recent prior works have proposed methods for test time adaptation, however, they each introduce additional assumptions. We propose a simple approach that can be used in any test setting where the model is probabilistic and adaptable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-18T17:55:11Z)
• Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation [102.67010690592011]
  Unsupervised adaptationUDA (UDA) aims to leverage the knowledge learned from a labeled source dataset to solve similar tasks in a new unlabeled domain. Prior UDA methods typically require to access the source data when learning to adapt the model. This work tackles a practical setting where only a trained source model is available and how we can effectively utilize such a model without source data to solve UDA problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-20T03:13:58Z)
• Model adaptation and unsupervised learning with non-stationary batch data under smooth concept drift [8.068725688880772]
  Most predictive models assume that training and test data are generated from a stationary process. We consider the scenario of a gradual concept drift due to the underlying non-stationarity of the data source. We propose a novel, iterative algorithm for unsupervised adaptation of predictive models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-10T21:29:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.