Towards a process-based approach to consciousness and collapse in quantum mechanics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.04152v1
• Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 17:07:41 GMT
• Title: Towards a process-based approach to consciousness and collapse in quantum mechanics
• Authors: Raoni Arroyo and Lauro de Matos Nunes Filho and Frederik Moreira dos Santos
• Abstract summary: According to a particular interpretation of quantum mechanics, the causal role of human consciousness in the measuring process is called upon to solve a foundational problem called the "measurement problem" Our working hypothesis is that a process-based approach to the consciousness causes collapse interpretation offers a better metaphysical understanding of consciousness and its role in interpreting quantum mechanics.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: According to a particular interpretation of quantum mechanics, the causal role of human consciousness in the measuring process is called upon to solve a foundational problem called the "measurement problem". Traditionally, this interpretation is tied up with the metaphysics of substance dualism. As such, this interpretation of quantum mechanics inherits the dualist's mind-body problem. Our working hypothesis is that a process-based approach to the consciousness causes collapse interpretation (CCCI) -- leaning on Whitehead's solution to the mind-body problem -- offers a better metaphysical understanding of consciousness and its role in interpreting quantum mechanics. This article is the kickoff for such a research program in the metaphysics of science.

Related papers

• Quantum panprotopsychism and the structure and subject-summing combination problem [0.0]
  We show that the subject-summing problem originally posed by William James is probably the first and most important combination problem of panpsychism. We turn to the notion of subject of experience inspired by the idea of prehension proposed by Whitehead. The analysis imposes conditions on possible implementations of quantum cognition mechanisms in the brain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-02T16:47:57Z)
• Quantum Entanglement Through the Lens of Paraconsistent Logic [0.0]
  This paper presents an alternative approach to quantum entanglement, one that effectively resolves the logical inconsistencies without leading to logical contradictions. By addressing some of the inconsistencies within quantum mechanics, such as state superposition and non-locality, our method is constructed on the principles of paraconsistent logic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-14T17:10:20Z)
• Understanding and Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics [0.65268245109828]
  De Regt's contextual theory of understanding argues that recognizing qualitatively characteristic consequences of a theory T without performing exact calculations is a criterion for scientific understanding. If the task of understanding quantum mechanics has been finished already, there would be a conflict between the contextual theory of understanding of quantum mechanics and interpretations of quantum mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-25T10:59:30Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• The Real Meaning of Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
  We suggest a contextual realist interpretation of relational quantum mechanics. The principal point is a correct understanding of the concept of reality. Within our interpretation, consciousness of the observer does not play any metaphysical role.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-20T19:44:50Z)
• Standard Model Physics and the Digital Quantum Revolution: Thoughts about the Interface [68.8204255655161]
  Advances in isolating, controlling and entangling quantum systems are transforming what was once a curious feature of quantum mechanics into a vehicle for disruptive scientific and technological progress. From the perspective of three domain science theorists, this article compiles thoughts about the interface on entanglement, complexity, and quantum simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-10T06:12:06Z)
• Quantum Causal Inference in the Presence of Hidden Common Causes: an Entropic Approach [34.77250498401055]
  We put forth a new theoretical framework for merging quantum information science and causal inference by exploiting entropic principles. We apply our proposed framework to an experimentally relevant scenario of identifying message senders on quantum noisy links. This approach can lay the foundations of identifying originators of malicious activity on future multi-node quantum networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-24T22:45:50Z)
• Quantum Entropic Causal Inference [30.939150842529052]
  We put forth a new theoretical framework for merging quantum information science and causal inference by exploiting entropic principles. We apply our proposed framework to an experimentally relevant scenario of identifying message senders on quantum noisy links.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-23T15:51:34Z)
• Cost of quantum entanglement simplified [13.683637401785505]
  We introduce an entanglement measure that has a precise information-theoretic meaning as the exact cost required to prepare an entangled state. Our results bring key insights into the fundamental entanglement structure of arbitrary quantum states, and they can be used directly to assess and quantify the entanglement produced in quantum-physical experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-28T14:36:23Z)
• Preferred basis, decoherence and a quantum state of the Universe [77.34726150561087]
  We review a number of issues in foundations of quantum theory and quantum cosmology. These issues can be considered as a part of the scientific legacy of H.D. Zeh.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-28T18:07:59Z)
• The (Quantum) Measurement Problem in Classical Mechanics [0.0]
  We show why this is not an "obvious" nor "self evident" problem for the theory of quanta. We discuss a representational realist account of both physical 'theories' and'measurement' We show how through these same set of presuppositions it is easy to derive a completely analogous paradox for the case of classical mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-01T17:07:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.