Understanding and Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.00975v1
• Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 10:59:30 GMT
• Title: Understanding and Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics
• Authors: Dong Luo
• Abstract summary: De Regt's contextual theory of understanding argues that recognizing qualitatively characteristic consequences of a theory T without performing exact calculations is a criterion for scientific understanding. If the task of understanding quantum mechanics has been finished already, there would be a conflict between the contextual theory of understanding of quantum mechanics and interpretations of quantum mechanics.
• Score: 0.65268245109828
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Taking Heisenberg's and Schrodinger's theories of quantum mechanics as his case study, De Regt's contextual theory of understanding argues that recognizing qualitatively characteristic consequences of a theory T without performing exact calculations is a criterion for scientific understanding. From the perspective of this theory of understanding, the task of understanding quantum mechanics seems to have been achieved already or even finished. This appears to disagree with some physicists' attitude to the understanding of quantum mechanics in line with Richard Feynman's famous slogan "I think I can safely say that nobody really understands quantum mechanics." Moreover, if the task of understanding quantum mechanics has been finished already, there would be a conflict between the contextual theory of understanding of quantum mechanics and interpretations of quantum mechanics.

Related papers

• An Indeterminacy-based Ontology for Quantum Theory [0.0]
  I present and defend a new ontology for quantum theories (or sinterpretation'' of quantum theory) called Generative Quantum Interpretation (GQT) GQT provides a series of important benefits that current widely discussed lack, namely, wave function realism and primitive primitive, without some of their costs. I will argue that GQT should be taken seriously because it provides a series of important benefits that current widely discussed lack, namely, wave function realism and primitive primitive, without some of their costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T17:55:58Z)
• Unraveling the Mystery of Quantum Measurement with A New Space-Time Approach to Relativistic Quantum Mechanics [9.116661570248171]
  Quantum measurement is a fundamental concept in the field of quantum mechanics. Despite its significance, four fundamental issues continue to pose significant challenges to the broader application of quantum measurement. We employ a new space-time approach to relativistic quantum mechanics to address these issues systematically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T13:25:08Z)
• Spin Quantum Heat Engine Quantified by Quantum Steering [11.372394890620187]
  We experimentally demonstrate that the quantum correlation between the working medium and the thermal bath is critical for the quantum advantage of a quantum Szilard engine. By quantifying the non-classical correlation through quantum steering, we reveal that the heat engine is quantum when the demon can truly steer the working medium.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-04T08:04:25Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Testing quantum theory with thought experiments [4.847980206213335]
  How should one model systems that include agents who are themselves using quantum theory? We give a state-of-the-art overview on quantum thought experiments involving observers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T18:08:23Z)
• Demystifying Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
  We discuss the concepts of physical reality imposed by quantum mechanics, the role of the observer, prediction limits, a definition of collapse, and how to deal with correlated states. The discussion is carried out within the framework of accepting that there is in fact nothing important missing, rather we are just restricted by the limitations imposed by quantum mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T22:32:11Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• Understanding Quantum Mechanics (Beyond Metaphysical Dogmatism and Naive Empiricism) [0.0]
  We will argue that the reason behind the impossibility to reach a meaningful answer to this question is strictly related to the 20th Century Bohrian-positivist re-foundation of physics. We will also argue that the possibility of understanding QM is at plain sight, given we return to the original framework of physics in which the meaning of understanding has always been clear.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-01T14:40:44Z)
• Cost of quantum entanglement simplified [13.683637401785505]
  We introduce an entanglement measure that has a precise information-theoretic meaning as the exact cost required to prepare an entangled state. Our results bring key insights into the fundamental entanglement structure of arbitrary quantum states, and they can be used directly to assess and quantify the entanglement produced in quantum-physical experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-28T14:36:23Z)
• Is the standard quantum mechanics a completely nondeterministic theory? [0.0]
  It is argued that although quantum theory isn't an absolutely deterministic theory, it is partially deterministic. The argument is based on the conceptual meaning of determinism and by means of some well-known phenomena in the quantum world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-04T14:48:13Z)
• Quantum simulation of quantum field theories as quantum chemistry [9.208624182273288]
  Conformal truncation is a powerful numerical method for solving generic strongly-coupled quantum field theories. We show that quantum computation could not only help us understand fundamental physics in the lattice approximation, but also simulate quantum field theory methods directly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-28T01:20:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.