How VADER is your AI? Towards a definition of artificial intelligence
systems appropriate for regulation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.05048v2
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 12:02:45 GMT
- Title: How VADER is your AI? Towards a definition of artificial intelligence
systems appropriate for regulation
- Authors: Leonardo C. T. Bezerra, Alexander E. I. Brownlee, Luana Ferraz
Alvarenga, Renan Cipriano Moioli, Thais Vasconcelos Batista
- Abstract summary: Recent AI regulation proposals adopt AI definitions affecting ICT techniques, approaches, and systems that are not AI.
We propose a framework to score how validated as appropriately-defined for regulation (VADER) an AI definition is.
- Score: 41.94295877935867
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) has driven many information and communication
technology (ICT) breakthroughs. Nonetheless, the scope of ICT systems has
expanded far beyond AI since the Turing test proposal. Critically, recent AI
regulation proposals adopt AI definitions affecting ICT techniques, approaches,
and systems that are not AI. In some cases, even works from mathematics,
statistics, and engineering would be affected. Worryingly, AI misdefinitions
are observed from Western societies to the Global South. In this paper, we
propose a framework to score how validated as appropriately-defined for
regulation (VADER) an AI definition is. Our online, publicly-available VADER
framework scores the coverage of premises that should underlie AI definitions
for regulation, which aim to (i) reproduce principles observed in other
successful technology regulations, and (ii) include all AI techniques and
approaches while excluding non-AI works. Regarding the latter, our score is
based on a dataset of representative AI, non-AI ICT, and non-ICT examples. We
demonstrate our contribution by reviewing the AI regulation proposals of key
players, namely the United States, United Kingdom, European Union, and Brazil.
Importantly, none of the proposals assessed achieve the appropriateness score,
ranging from a revision need to a concrete risk to ICT systems and works from
other fields.
Related papers
- Combining AI Control Systems and Human Decision Support via Robustness and Criticality [53.10194953873209]
We extend a methodology for adversarial explanations (AE) to state-of-the-art reinforcement learning frameworks.
We show that the learned AI control system demonstrates robustness against adversarial tampering.
In a training / learning framework, this technology can improve both the AI's decisions and explanations through human interaction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-03T15:38:57Z) - Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
Particip-AI is a framework to gather current and future AI use cases and their harms and benefits from non-expert public.
We gather responses from 295 demographically diverse participants.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z) - Trust, Accountability, and Autonomy in Knowledge Graph-based AI for
Self-determination [1.4305544869388402]
Knowledge Graphs (KGs) have emerged as fundamental platforms for powering intelligent decision-making.
The integration of KGs with neuronal learning is currently a topic of active research.
This paper conceptualises the foundational topics and research pillars to support KG-based AI for self-determination.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-30T12:51:52Z) - AI Deception: A Survey of Examples, Risks, and Potential Solutions [20.84424818447696]
This paper argues that a range of current AI systems have learned how to deceive humans.
We define deception as the systematic inducement of false beliefs in the pursuit of some outcome other than the truth.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-28T17:59:35Z) - Inherent Limitations of AI Fairness [16.588468396705366]
The study of AI fairness has rapidly developed into a rich field of research with links to computer science, social science, law, and philosophy.
Many technical solutions for measuring and achieving AI fairness have been proposed, yet their approach has been criticized in recent years for being misleading, unrealistic and harmful.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-13T11:23:24Z) - Aligning Artificial Intelligence with Humans through Public Policy [0.0]
This essay outlines research on AI that learn structures in policy data that can be leveraged for downstream tasks.
We believe this represents the "comprehension" phase of AI and policy, but leveraging policy as a key source of human values to align AI requires "understanding" policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-25T21:31:14Z) - Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary
Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them.
We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives.
We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z) - Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) [58.981120701284816]
Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) will incorporate explicit quantifications and visualizations of user confidence in AI recommendations.
It will allow examining and testing of AI system predictions to establish a basis for trust in the systems' decision making.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-26T18:53:09Z) - An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive
qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence.
The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z) - AI Governance for Businesses [2.072259480917207]
It aims at leveraging AI through effective use of data and minimization of AI-related cost and risk.
This work views AI products as systems, where key functionality is delivered by machine learning (ML) models leveraging (training) data.
Our framework decomposes AI governance into governance of data, (ML) models and (AI) systems along four dimensions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-20T22:31:37Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.