More Agents Is All You Need

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.05120v2
• Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 09:38:40 GMT
• Title: More Agents Is All You Need
• Authors: Junyou Li, Qin Zhang, Yangbin Yu, Qiang Fu, Deheng Ye,
• Abstract summary: We find that, simply via a sampling-and-voting method, the performance of large language models (LLMs) scales with the number of agents instantiated.
• Score: 16.372072265248192
• License:
• Abstract: We find that, simply via a sampling-and-voting method, the performance of large language models (LLMs) scales with the number of agents instantiated. Also, this method, termed as Agent Forest, is orthogonal to existing complicated methods to further enhance LLMs, while the degree of enhancement is correlated to the task difficulty. We conduct comprehensive experiments on a wide range of LLM benchmarks to verify the presence of our finding, and to study the properties that can facilitate its occurrence. Our code is publicly available at: https://github.com/MoreAgentsIsAllYouNeed/AgentForest

Related papers

• Large Language Model-Based Agents for Software Engineering: A Survey [20.258244647363544]
  The recent advance in Large Language Models (LLMs) has shaped a new paradigm of AI agents, i.e., LLM-based agents. We collect 106 papers and categorize them from two perspectives, i.e., the SE and agent perspectives. In addition, we discuss open challenges and future directions in this critical domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T15:59:41Z)
• DARG: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models via Adaptive Reasoning Graph [70.79413606968814]
  We introduce Dynamic Evaluation of LLMs via Adaptive Reasoning Graph Evolvement (DARG) to dynamically extend current benchmarks with controlled complexity and diversity. Specifically, we first extract the reasoning graphs of data points in current benchmarks and then perturb the reasoning graphs to generate novel testing data. Such newly generated test samples can have different levels of complexity while maintaining linguistic diversity similar to the original benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T04:27:53Z)
• Small Agent Can Also Rock! Empowering Small Language Models as Hallucination Detector [114.88975874411142]
  Hallucination detection is a challenging task for large language models (LLMs) We propose an autonomous LLM-based agent framework, called HaluAgent. In HaluAgent, we integrate the LLM, multi-functional toolbox, and design a fine-grained three-stage detection framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T07:30:05Z)
• LLM-based Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: Current and Future Directions [8.55917897789612]
  We focus on the cooperative tasks of multiple agents with a common goal and communication among them. We also consider human-in/on-the-loop scenarios enabled by the language component in the framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-17T22:10:23Z)
• AgentQuest: A Modular Benchmark Framework to Measure Progress and Improve LLM Agents [19.439775106707344]
  AgentQuest is a framework where benchmarks and metrics are modular and easily through well documented and easy-to-use APIs. We offer two new evaluation metrics that can reliably track LLM agent progress while solving a task. We exemplify the utility of the metrics on two use cases wherein we identify common failure points and refine the agent architecture to obtain a significant performance increase.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-09T16:01:24Z)
• Agent-FLAN: Designing Data and Methods of Effective Agent Tuning for Large Language Models [56.00992369295851]
  Open-sourced Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved great success in various NLP tasks, however, they are still far inferior to API-based models when acting as agents. This paper delivers three key observations: (1) the current agent training corpus is entangled with both formats following and agent reasoning, which significantly shifts from the distribution of its pre-training data; (2) LLMs exhibit different learning speeds on the capabilities required by agent tasks; and (3) current approaches have side-effects when improving agent abilities by introducing hallucinations. We propose Agent-FLAN to effectively Fine-tune LANguage models for Agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T16:26:10Z)
• Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challenges [44.92286030322281]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success across a wide array of tasks. Recently, based on the development of using one LLM as a single planning or decision-making agent, LLM-based multi-agent systems have achieved considerable progress in complex problem-solving and world simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-21T23:36:14Z)
• Recommender AI Agent: Integrating Large Language Models for Interactive Recommendations [53.76682562935373]
  We introduce an efficient framework called textbfInteRecAgent, which employs LLMs as the brain and recommender models as tools. InteRecAgent achieves satisfying performance as a conversational recommender system, outperforming general-purpose LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-31T07:36:44Z)
• AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents [88.45506148281379]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming increasingly smart and autonomous, targeting real-world pragmatic missions beyond traditional NLP tasks. We present AgentBench, a benchmark that currently consists of 8 distinct environments to assess LLM-as-Agent's reasoning and decision-making abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T16:08:11Z)
• Do Embodied Agents Dream of Pixelated Sheep: Embodied Decision Making using Language Guided World Modelling [101.59430768507997]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) agents typically learn tabula rasa, without prior knowledge of the world. We propose using few-shot large language models (LLMs) to hypothesize an Abstract World Model (AWM) Our method of hypothesizing an AWM with LLMs and then verifying the AWM based on agent experience not only increases sample efficiency over contemporary methods by an order of magnitude.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-28T02:04:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.