NoisyICL: A Little Noise in Model Parameters Calibrates In-context Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.05515v2
• Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 15:25:47 GMT
• Title: NoisyICL: A Little Noise in Model Parameters Calibrates In-context Learning
• Authors: Yufeng Zhao, Yoshihiro Sakai, Naoya Inoue
• Abstract summary: In-Context Learning (ICL) is suffering from unsatisfactory performance and under-calibration due to high prior bias and unfaithful confidence. In this paper, we propose NoisyICL, simply perturbing the model parameters by random noises to strive for better performance and calibration.
• Score: 5.2538258920647944
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In-Context Learning (ICL) is suffering from unsatisfactory performance and under-calibration due to high prior bias and unfaithful confidence. Some previous works fine-tuned language models for better ICL performance with enormous datasets and computing costs. In this paper, we propose NoisyICL, simply perturbing the model parameters by random noises to strive for better performance and calibration. Our experiments on two models and 12 downstream datasets show that NoisyICL can help ICL produce more accurate predictions. Our further analysis indicates that NoisyICL enables the model to provide more fair predictions, and also with more faithful confidence. Therefore, we believe that NoisyICL is an effective calibration of ICL. Our experimental code is uploaded to Github.

Related papers

• NAACL: Noise-AwAre Verbal Confidence Calibration for LLMs in RAG Systems [53.52419750390942]
  Large language models (LLMs) are used in mission-critical factual domains.<n>LLMs exhibit poor calibration performance due to noisy retrieved contexts.<n>We propose NAACL Rules (Noise-AwAre Confidence CaLibration Rules) to provide a principled foundation for resolving overconfidence under noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T05:38:25Z)
• Mitigating Spurious Correlations in LLMs via Causality-Aware Post-Training [57.03005244917803]
  Large language models (LLMs) often fail on out-of-distribution (OOD) samples due to spurious correlations acquired during pre-training.<n>Here, we aim to mitigate such spurious correlations through causality-aware post-training (CAPT)<n> Experiments on the formal causal inference benchmark CLadder and the logical reasoning dataset PrOntoQA show that 3B-scale language models fine-tuned with CAPT can outperform both traditional SFT and larger LLMs on in-distribution (ID) and OOD tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T06:30:28Z)
• Handling Label Noise via Instance-Level Difficulty Modeling and Dynamic Optimization [33.13911801301048]
  Deep neural networks degrade in generalization performance under noisy supervision.<n>Existing methods focus on isolating clean subsets or correcting noisy labels.<n>We propose a novel two-stage noisy learning framework that enables instance-level optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-01T19:12:58Z)
• Noise Augmented Fine Tuning for Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Language Models [1.0579965347526206]
  Large language models (LLMs) often produce inaccurate or misleading content-hallucinations. Noise-Augmented Fine-Tuning (NoiseFiT) is a novel framework that leverages adaptive noise injection to enhance model robustness. NoiseFiT selectively perturbs layers identified as either high-SNR (more robust) or low-SNR (potentially under-regularized) using a dynamically scaled Gaussian noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-04T09:27:19Z)
• N2C2: Nearest Neighbor Enhanced Confidence Calibration for Cross-Lingual In-Context Learning [49.42251584116942]
  We conduct a thorough analysis of in-context learning (ICL) for cross-lingual scenarios. ICL performs poorly in cross-lingual scenarios, exhibiting low accuracy and presenting high calibration errors. We propose a novel approach, N2C2, which employs a -nearest neighbors augmented for prediction confidence calibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T10:05:05Z)
• Do we really have to filter out random noise in pre-training data for language models? [42.966566701950164]
  Pre-training text data curated from the internet inevitably contains random noise caused by decoding errors or unregulated web content. We provide a theoretical justification for this phenomenon, which also elucidates the success of multilingual models. Experiments show that the model's performance in downstream tasks is not based solely on the NTP loss, which means that random noise may result in degraded downstream performance. We introduce a novel plug-and-play Local Gradient Matching loss, which explicitly enhances the denoising capability of the downstream task head.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T16:01:55Z)
• How to Learn a New Language? An Efficient Solution for Self-Supervised Learning Models Unseen Languages Adaption in Low-Resource Scenario [72.02391485962127]
  Speech Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) models achieve impressive performance on Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) In low-resource language ASR, they encounter the domain mismatch problem between pre-trained and low-resource languages. We extend a conventional efficient fine-tuning scheme based on the adapter to handle these issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-27T10:51:00Z)
• Conformal-in-the-Loop for Learning with Imbalanced Noisy Data [5.69777817429044]
  Class imbalance and label noise are pervasive in large-scale datasets. Much of machine learning research assumes well-labeled, balanced data, which rarely reflects real world conditions. We propose Conformal-in-the-Loop (CitL), a novel training framework that addresses both challenges with a conformal prediction-based approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T17:09:58Z)
• Why Larger Language Models Do In-context Learning Differently? [12.554356517949785]
  Large language models (LLM) have emerged as a powerful tool for AI, with the key ability of in-context learning (ICL) One recent mysterious observation is that models of different scales may have different ICL behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T01:11:35Z)
• Low-rank finetuning for LLMs: A fairness perspective [54.13240282850982]
  Low-rank approximation techniques have become the de facto standard for fine-tuning Large Language Models. This paper investigates the effectiveness of these methods in capturing the shift of fine-tuning datasets from the initial pre-trained data distribution. We show that low-rank fine-tuning inadvertently preserves undesirable biases and toxic behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T20:43:53Z)
• Advancing the Robustness of Large Language Models through Self-Denoised Smoothing [50.54276872204319]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved significant success, but their vulnerability to adversarial perturbations has raised considerable concerns. We propose to leverage the multitasking nature of LLMs to first denoise the noisy inputs and then to make predictions based on these denoised versions. Unlike previous denoised smoothing techniques in computer vision, which require training a separate model to enhance the robustness of LLMs, our method offers significantly better efficiency and flexibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T15:47:00Z)
• ROPO: Robust Preference Optimization for Large Language Models [59.10763211091664]
  We propose an iterative alignment approach that integrates noise-tolerance and filtering of noisy samples without the aid of external models. Experiments on three widely-used datasets with Mistral-7B and Llama-2-7B demonstrate that ROPO significantly outperforms existing preference alignment methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-05T13:58:51Z)
• Learning with Noisy Foundation Models [95.50968225050012]
  This paper is the first work to comprehensively understand and analyze the nature of noise in pre-training datasets. We propose a tuning method (NMTune) to affine the feature space to mitigate the malignant effect of noise and improve generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T16:22:41Z)
• In-context Learning and Gradient Descent Revisited [3.085927389171139]
  We show that even untrained models achieve comparable ICL-GD similarity scores despite not exhibiting ICL. Next, we explore a major discrepancy in the flow of information throughout the model between ICL and GD, which we term Layer Causality. We propose a simple GD-based optimization procedure that respects layer causality, and show it improves similarity scores significantly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T21:42:38Z)
• Learning correlated noise in a 39-qubit quantum processor [0.38073142980732994]
  Building error-corrected quantum computers relies crucially on measuring and modeling noise on candidate devices. Here we propose a method of extracting detailed information of the noise in a device running syndrome extraction circuits. We show how to extract from the 20 data qubits the information needed to build noise models of various sophistication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-01T19:07:35Z)
• Latent Class-Conditional Noise Model [54.56899309997246]
  We introduce a Latent Class-Conditional Noise model (LCCN) to parameterize the noise transition under a Bayesian framework. We then deduce a dynamic label regression method for LCCN, whose Gibbs sampler allows us efficiently infer the latent true labels. Our approach safeguards the stable update of the noise transition, which avoids previous arbitrarily tuning from a mini-batch of samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-19T15:24:37Z)
• A Self-Refinement Strategy for Noise Reduction in Grammatical Error Correction [54.569707226277735]
  Existing approaches for grammatical error correction (GEC) rely on supervised learning with manually created GEC datasets. There is a non-negligible amount of "noise" where errors were inappropriately edited or left uncorrected. We propose a self-refinement method where the key idea is to denoise these datasets by leveraging the prediction consistency of existing models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-07T04:45:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.