Quantifying and Enhancing Multi-modal Robustness with Modality Preference

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.06244v2
• Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 08:08:45 GMT
• Title: Quantifying and Enhancing Multi-modal Robustness with Modality Preference
• Authors: Zequn Yang, Yake Wei, Ce Liang, Di Hu,
• Abstract summary: Multi-modal models are vulnerable to pervasive perturbations, such as uni-modal attacks and missing conditions. Larger uni-modal representation margins and more reliable integration for modalities are essential components for achieving higher robustness. Inspired by our theoretical finding, we introduce a training procedure called Certifiable Robust Multi-modal Training.
• Score: 9.367733452960492
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Multi-modal models have shown a promising capability to effectively integrate information from various sources, yet meanwhile, they are found vulnerable to pervasive perturbations, such as uni-modal attacks and missing conditions. To counter these perturbations, robust multi-modal representations are highly expected, which are positioned well away from the discriminative multi-modal decision boundary. In this paper, different from conventional empirical studies, we focus on a commonly used joint multi-modal framework and theoretically discover that larger uni-modal representation margins and more reliable integration for modalities are essential components for achieving higher robustness. This discovery can further explain the limitation of multi-modal robustness and the phenomenon that multi-modal models are often vulnerable to attacks on the specific modality. Moreover, our analysis reveals how the widespread issue, that the model has different preferences for modalities, limits the multi-modal robustness by influencing the essential components and could lead to attacks on the specific modality highly effective. Inspired by our theoretical finding, we introduce a training procedure called Certifiable Robust Multi-modal Training (CRMT), which can alleviate this influence from modality preference and explicitly regulate essential components to significantly improve robustness in a certifiable manner. Our method demonstrates substantial improvements in performance and robustness compared with existing methods. Furthermore, our training procedure can be easily extended to enhance other robust training strategies, highlighting its credibility and flexibility.

Related papers

• Missing Modality Prediction for Unpaired Multimodal Learning via Joint Embedding of Unimodal Models [6.610033827647869]
  In real-world scenarios, consistently acquiring complete multimodal data presents significant challenges. This often leads to the issue of missing modalities, where data for certain modalities are absent. We propose a novel framework integrating parameter-efficient fine-tuning of unimodal pretrained models with a self-supervised joint-embedding learning method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T14:44:25Z)
• Benchmarking Trustworthiness of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Study [51.19622266249408]
  MultiTrust is the first comprehensive and unified benchmark on the trustworthiness of MLLMs. Our benchmark employs a rigorous evaluation strategy that addresses both multimodal risks and cross-modal impacts. Extensive experiments with 21 modern MLLMs reveal some previously unexplored trustworthiness issues and risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T08:38:13Z)
• Confidence-aware multi-modality learning for eye disease screening [58.861421804458395]
  We propose a novel multi-modality evidential fusion pipeline for eye disease screening. It provides a measure of confidence for each modality and elegantly integrates the multi-modality information. Experimental results on both public and internal datasets demonstrate that our model excels in robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T13:27:30Z)
• Beyond Unimodal Learning: The Importance of Integrating Multiple Modalities for Lifelong Learning [23.035725779568587]
  We study the role and interactions of multiple modalities in mitigating forgetting in deep neural networks (DNNs) Our findings demonstrate that leveraging multiple views and complementary information from multiple modalities enables the model to learn more accurate and robust representations. We propose a method for integrating and aligning the information from different modalities by utilizing the relational structural similarities between the data points in each modality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-04T22:02:58Z)
• Unified Multi-modal Unsupervised Representation Learning for Skeleton-based Action Understanding [62.70450216120704]
  Unsupervised pre-training has shown great success in skeleton-based action understanding. We propose a Unified Multimodal Unsupervised Representation Learning framework, called UmURL. UmURL exploits an efficient early-fusion strategy to jointly encode the multi-modal features in a single-stream manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T13:56:57Z)
• Provable Dynamic Fusion for Low-Quality Multimodal Data [94.39538027450948]
  Dynamic multimodal fusion emerges as a promising learning paradigm. Despite its widespread use, theoretical justifications in this field are still notably lacking. This paper provides theoretical understandings to answer this question under a most popular multimodal fusion framework from the generalization perspective. A novel multimodal fusion framework termed Quality-aware Multimodal Fusion (QMF) is proposed, which can improve the performance in terms of classification accuracy and model robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-03T08:32:35Z)
• Calibrating Multimodal Learning [94.65232214643436]
  We propose a novel regularization technique, i.e., Calibrating Multimodal Learning (CML) regularization, to calibrate the predictive confidence of previous methods. This technique could be flexibly equipped by existing models and improve the performance in terms of confidence calibration, classification accuracy, and model robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-02T04:29:57Z)
• Analyzing Modality Robustness in Multimodal Sentiment Analysis [48.52878002917685]
  Building robust multimodal models is crucial for achieving reliable deployment in the wild. We propose simple diagnostic checks for modality robustness in a trained multimodal model. We analyze well-known robust training strategies to alleviate the issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-30T23:30:16Z)
• Understanding and Measuring Robustness of Multimodal Learning [14.257147031953211]
  We introduce a comprehensive measurement of the adversarial robustness of multimodal learning via a framework called MUROAN. We first present a unified view of multimodal models in MUROAN and identify the fusion mechanism of multimodal models as a key vulnerability. We then introduce a new type of multimodal adversarial attacks called decoupling attack in MUROAN that aims to compromise multimodal models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-22T21:10:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.