PoisonedRAG: Knowledge Corruption Attacks to Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.07867v3
• Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 01:55:06 GMT
• Title: PoisonedRAG: Knowledge Corruption Attacks to Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Models
• Authors: Wei Zou, Runpeng Geng, Binghui Wang, Jinyuan Jia,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success due to their exceptional generative capabilities. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a state-of-the-art technique to mitigate these limitations. We find that the knowledge database in a RAG system introduces a new and practical attack surface. Based on this attack surface, we propose PoisonedRAG, the first knowledge corruption attack to RAG.
• Score: 45.409248316497674
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success due to their exceptional generative capabilities. Despite their success, they also have inherent limitations such as a lack of up-to-date knowledge and hallucination. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a state-of-the-art technique to mitigate these limitations. The key idea of RAG is to ground the answer generation of an LLM on external knowledge retrieved from a knowledge database. Existing studies mainly focus on improving the accuracy or efficiency of RAG, leaving its security largely unexplored. We aim to bridge the gap in this work. We find that the knowledge database in a RAG system introduces a new and practical attack surface. Based on this attack surface, we propose PoisonedRAG, the first knowledge corruption attack to RAG, where an attacker could inject a few malicious texts into the knowledge database of a RAG system to induce an LLM to generate an attacker-chosen target answer for an attacker-chosen target question. We formulate knowledge corruption attacks as an optimization problem, whose solution is a set of malicious texts. Depending on the background knowledge (e.g., black-box and white-box settings) of an attacker on a RAG system, we propose two solutions to solve the optimization problem, respectively. Our results show PoisonedRAG could achieve a 90% attack success rate when injecting five malicious texts for each target question into a knowledge database with millions of texts. We also evaluate several defenses and our results show they are insufficient to defend against PoisonedRAG, highlighting the need for new defenses.

Related papers

• HijackRAG: Hijacking Attacks against Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models [18.301965456681764]
  We reveal a novel vulnerability, the retrieval prompt hijack attack (HijackRAG) HijackRAG enables attackers to manipulate the retrieval mechanisms of RAG systems by injecting malicious texts into the knowledge database. We propose both black-box and white-box attack strategies tailored to different levels of the attacker's knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T09:15:51Z)
• Rag and Roll: An End-to-End Evaluation of Indirect Prompt Manipulations in LLM-based Application Frameworks [12.061098193438022]
  Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) is a technique commonly used to equip models with out of distribution knowledge. This paper investigates the security of RAG systems against end-to-end indirect prompt manipulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-09T12:26:05Z)
• Turning Generative Models Degenerate: The Power of Data Poisoning Attacks [10.36389246679405]
  Malicious actors can introduce backdoors through poisoning attacks to generate undesirable outputs. We conduct an investigation of various poisoning techniques targeting the large language models' fine-tuning phase via the Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) method. Our study presents the first systematic approach to understanding poisoning attacks targeting NLG tasks during fine-tuning via PEFT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T03:02:15Z)
• "Glue pizza and eat rocks" -- Exploiting Vulnerabilities in Retrieval-Augmented Generative Models [74.05368440735468]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generative (RAG) models enhance Large Language Models (LLMs) In this paper, we demonstrate a security threat where adversaries can exploit the openness of these knowledge bases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-26T05:36:23Z)
• Phantom: General Trigger Attacks on Retrieval Augmented Language Generation [30.63258739968483]
  Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) expands the capabilities of modern large language models (LLMs) We propose new attack vectors that allow an adversary to inject a single malicious document into a RAG system's knowledge base, and mount a backdoor poisoning attack. We demonstrate our attacks on multiple LLM architectures, including Gemma, Vicuna, and Llama, and show that they transfer to GPT-3.5 Turbo and GPT-4.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T21:19:24Z)
• Certifiably Robust RAG against Retrieval Corruption [58.677292678310934]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has been shown vulnerable to retrieval corruption attacks. In this paper, we propose RobustRAG as the first defense framework against retrieval corruption attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T13:44:25Z)
• Typos that Broke the RAG's Back: Genetic Attack on RAG Pipeline by Simulating Documents in the Wild via Low-level Perturbations [9.209974698634175]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a promising solution for addressing the limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs) In this work, we investigate two underexplored aspects when assessing the robustness of RAG. We introduce a novel attack method, the Genetic Attack on RAG (textitGARAG), which targets these aspects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T07:49:36Z)
• The Good and The Bad: Exploring Privacy Issues in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) [56.67603627046346]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is a powerful technique to facilitate language model with proprietary and private data. In this work, we conduct empirical studies with novel attack methods, which demonstrate the vulnerability of RAG systems on leaking the private retrieval database.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T18:35:15Z)
• On the Security Risks of Knowledge Graph Reasoning [71.64027889145261]
  We systematize the security threats to KGR according to the adversary's objectives, knowledge, and attack vectors. We present ROAR, a new class of attacks that instantiate a variety of such threats. We explore potential countermeasures against ROAR, including filtering of potentially poisoning knowledge and training with adversarially augmented queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-03T18:47:42Z)
• Challenges and Countermeasures for Adversarial Attacks on Deep Reinforcement Learning [48.49658986576776]
  Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) has numerous applications in the real world thanks to its outstanding ability in adapting to the surrounding environments. Despite its great advantages, DRL is susceptible to adversarial attacks, which precludes its use in real-life critical systems and applications. This paper presents emerging attacks in DRL-based systems and the potential countermeasures to defend against these attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-27T10:53:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.