HijackRAG: Hijacking Attacks against Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.22832v1
• Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 09:15:51 GMT
• Title: HijackRAG: Hijacking Attacks against Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models
• Authors: Yucheng Zhang, Qinfeng Li, Tianyu Du, Xuhong Zhang, Xinkui Zhao, Zhengwen Feng, Jianwei Yin,
• Abstract summary: We reveal a novel vulnerability, the retrieval prompt hijack attack (HijackRAG) HijackRAG enables attackers to manipulate the retrieval mechanisms of RAG systems by injecting malicious texts into the knowledge database. We propose both black-box and white-box attack strategies tailored to different levels of the attacker's knowledge.
• Score: 18.301965456681764
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems enhance large language models (LLMs) by integrating external knowledge, making them adaptable and cost-effective for various applications. However, the growing reliance on these systems also introduces potential security risks. In this work, we reveal a novel vulnerability, the retrieval prompt hijack attack (HijackRAG), which enables attackers to manipulate the retrieval mechanisms of RAG systems by injecting malicious texts into the knowledge database. When the RAG system encounters target questions, it generates the attacker's pre-determined answers instead of the correct ones, undermining the integrity and trustworthiness of the system. We formalize HijackRAG as an optimization problem and propose both black-box and white-box attack strategies tailored to different levels of the attacker's knowledge. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmark datasets show that HijackRAG consistently achieves high attack success rates, outperforming existing baseline attacks. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the attack is transferable across different retriever models, underscoring the widespread risk it poses to RAG systems. Lastly, our exploration of various defense mechanisms reveals that they are insufficient to counter HijackRAG, emphasizing the urgent need for more robust security measures to protect RAG systems in real-world deployments.

Related papers

• Hoist with His Own Petard: Inducing Guardrails to Facilitate Denial-of-Service Attacks on Retrieval-Augmented Generation of LLMs [8.09404178079053]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) integrates Large Language Models (LLMs) with external knowledge bases, improving output quality while introducing new security risks. Existing studies on RAG vulnerabilities typically focus on exploiting the retrieval mechanism to inject erroneous knowledge or malicious texts, inducing incorrect outputs. In this paper, we uncover a novel vulnerability: the safety guardrails of LLMs, while designed for protection, can also be exploited as an attack vector by adversaries. Building on this vulnerability, we propose MutedRAG, a novel denial-of-service attack that reversely leverages the guardrails to undermine the availability of
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-30T14:18:11Z)
• Poisoned-MRAG: Knowledge Poisoning Attacks to Multimodal Retrieval Augmented Generation [71.32665836294103]
  Multimodal retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances the visual reasoning capability of vision-language models (VLMs) In this work, we introduce textitPoisoned-MRAG, the first knowledge poisoning attack on multimodal RAG systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-08T15:46:38Z)
• The RAG Paradox: A Black-Box Attack Exploiting Unintentional Vulnerabilities in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems [8.347617177093056]
  We introduce a realistic black-box attack scenario based on the RAG paradox, where RAG systems inadvertently expose vulnerabilities while attempting to enhance trustworthiness. Because RAG systems reference external documents during response generation, our attack targets these sources without requiring internal access. Our approach first identifies the external sources disclosed by RAG systems and then automatically generates poisoned documents with misinformation designed to match these sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-28T12:32:53Z)
• MM-PoisonRAG: Disrupting Multimodal RAG with Local and Global Poisoning Attacks [109.53357276796655]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) equipped with Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) RAG enhances MLLMs by grounding responses in query-relevant external knowledge. This reliance poses a critical yet underexplored safety risk: knowledge poisoning attacks. We propose MM-PoisonRAG, a novel knowledge poisoning attack framework with two attack strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T04:23:59Z)
• Towards Trustworthy Retrieval Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey [92.36487127683053]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is an advanced technique designed to address the challenges of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Content (AIGC) RAG provides reliable and up-to-date external knowledge, reduces hallucinations, and ensures relevant context across a wide range of tasks. Despite RAG's success and potential, recent studies have shown that the RAG paradigm also introduces new risks, including privacy concerns, adversarial attacks, and accountability issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-08T06:50:47Z)
• SafeRAG: Benchmarking Security in Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Model [17.046058202577985]
  We introduce a benchmark named SafeRAG designed to evaluate the RAG security. First, we classify attack tasks into silver noise, inter-context conflict, soft ad, and white Denial-of-Service. We then utilize the SafeRAG dataset to simulate various attack scenarios that RAG may encounter.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-28T17:01:31Z)
• Pirates of the RAG: Adaptively Attacking LLMs to Leak Knowledge Bases [11.101624331624933]
  This paper presents a black-box attack to force a RAG system to leak its private knowledge base. A relevance-based mechanism and an attacker-side open-source LLM favor the generation of effective queries to leak most of the (hidden) knowledge base.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-24T09:03:57Z)
• Rag and Roll: An End-to-End Evaluation of Indirect Prompt Manipulations in LLM-based Application Frameworks [12.061098193438022]
  Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) is a technique commonly used to equip models with out of distribution knowledge. This paper investigates the security of RAG systems against end-to-end indirect prompt manipulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-09T12:26:05Z)
• ConfusedPilot: Confused Deputy Risks in RAG-based LLMs [2.423202571519879]
  We introduce ConfusedPilot, a class of security vulnerabilities of RAG systems that confuse Copilot and cause integrity and confidentiality violations in its responses. This study highlights the security vulnerabilities in today's RAG-based systems and proposes design guidelines to secure future RAG-based systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-09T05:20:05Z)
• "Glue pizza and eat rocks" -- Exploiting Vulnerabilities in Retrieval-Augmented Generative Models [74.05368440735468]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generative (RAG) models enhance Large Language Models (LLMs) In this paper, we demonstrate a security threat where adversaries can exploit the openness of these knowledge bases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-26T05:36:23Z)
• Corpus Poisoning via Approximate Greedy Gradient Descent [48.5847914481222]
  We propose Approximate Greedy Gradient Descent, a new attack on dense retrieval systems based on the widely used HotFlip method for generating adversarial passages. We show that our method achieves a high attack success rate on several datasets and using several retrievers, and can generalize to unseen queries and new domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T17:02:35Z)
• Is My Data in Your Retrieval Database? Membership Inference Attacks Against Retrieval Augmented Generation [0.9217021281095907]
  We introduce an efficient and easy-to-use method for conducting a Membership Inference Attack (MIA) against RAG systems. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our attack using two benchmark datasets and multiple generative models. Our findings highlight the importance of implementing security countermeasures in deployed RAG systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T19:46:36Z)
• Learning diverse attacks on large language models for robust red-teaming and safety tuning [126.32539952157083]
  Red-teaming, or identifying prompts that elicit harmful responses, is a critical step in ensuring the safe deployment of large language models. We show that even with explicit regularization to favor novelty and diversity, existing approaches suffer from mode collapse or fail to generate effective attacks. We propose to use GFlowNet fine-tuning, followed by a secondary smoothing phase, to train the attacker model to generate diverse and effective attack prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T19:16:17Z)
• Can We Trust Embodied Agents? Exploring Backdoor Attacks against Embodied LLM-based Decision-Making Systems [27.316115171846953]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown significant promise in real-world decision-making tasks for embodied AI. LLMs are fine-tuned to leverage their inherent common sense and reasoning abilities while being tailored to specific applications. This fine-tuning process introduces considerable safety and security vulnerabilities, especially in safety-critical cyber-physical systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T17:59:43Z)
• Rethinking the Vulnerabilities of Face Recognition Systems:From a Practical Perspective [53.24281798458074]
  Face Recognition Systems (FRS) have increasingly integrated into critical applications, including surveillance and user authentication. Recent studies have revealed vulnerabilities in FRS to adversarial (e.g., adversarial patch attacks) and backdoor attacks (e.g., training data poisoning)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T13:34:23Z)
• PoisonedRAG: Knowledge Corruption Attacks to Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Models [45.409248316497674]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success due to their exceptional generative capabilities. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a state-of-the-art technique to mitigate these limitations. We find that the knowledge database in a RAG system introduces a new and practical attack surface. Based on this attack surface, we propose PoisonedRAG, the first knowledge corruption attack to RAG.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T18:28:36Z)
• On the Security Risks of Knowledge Graph Reasoning [71.64027889145261]
  We systematize the security threats to KGR according to the adversary's objectives, knowledge, and attack vectors. We present ROAR, a new class of attacks that instantiate a variety of such threats. We explore potential countermeasures against ROAR, including filtering of potentially poisoning knowledge and training with adversarially augmented queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-03T18:47:42Z)
• Challenges and Countermeasures for Adversarial Attacks on Deep Reinforcement Learning [48.49658986576776]
  Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) has numerous applications in the real world thanks to its outstanding ability in adapting to the surrounding environments. Despite its great advantages, DRL is susceptible to adversarial attacks, which precludes its use in real-life critical systems and applications. This paper presents emerging attacks in DRL-based systems and the potential countermeasures to defend against these attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-27T10:53:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.