Human-Centered AI Product Prototyping with No-Code AutoML: Conceptual Framework, Potentials and Limitations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.07933v2
• Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 11:09:17 GMT
• Title: Human-Centered AI Product Prototyping with No-Code AutoML: Conceptual Framework, Potentials and Limitations
• Authors: Mario Truss, Marc Schmitt,
• Abstract summary: This paper focuses on the challenges posed by the probabilistic nature of AI behavior and the limited accessibility of prototyping tools to non-experts. A Design Science Research (DSR) approach is presented which culminates in a conceptual framework aimed at improving the AI prototyping process. The framework describes the seamless incorporation of non-expert input and evaluation during prototyping, leveraging the potential of no-code AutoML to enhance accessibility and interpretability.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper addresses the complexities inherent in AI product prototyping, focusing on the challenges posed by the probabilistic nature of AI behavior and the limited accessibility of prototyping tools to non-experts. A Design Science Research (DSR) approach is presented which culminates in a conceptual framework aimed at improving the AI prototyping process. Through a comprehensive literature review, key challenges were identified and no-code AutoML was analyzed as a solution. The framework describes the seamless incorporation of non-expert input and evaluation during prototyping, leveraging the potential of no-code AutoML to enhance accessibility and interpretability. A hybrid approach of combining naturalistic (case study) and artificial evaluation methods (criteria-based analysis) validated the utility of our approach, highlighting its efficacy in supporting AI non-experts and streamlining decision-making and its limitations. Implications for academia and industry, emphasizing the strategic integration of no-code AutoML to enhance AI product development processes, mitigate risks, and foster innovation, are discussed.

Related papers

• Generative AI in Health Economics and Outcomes Research: A Taxonomy of Key Definitions and Emerging Applications, an ISPOR Working Group Report [12.204470166456561]
  Generative AI shows significant potential in health economics and outcomes research (HEOR) Generative AI shows significant potential in HEOR, enhancing efficiency, productivity, and offering novel solutions to complex challenges. Foundation models are promising in automating complex tasks, though challenges remain in scientific reliability, bias, interpretability, and workflow integration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-26T15:42:50Z)
• Data Analysis in the Era of Generative AI [56.44807642944589]
  This paper explores the potential of AI-powered tools to reshape data analysis, focusing on design considerations and challenges. We explore how the emergence of large language and multimodal models offers new opportunities to enhance various stages of data analysis workflow. We then examine human-centered design principles that facilitate intuitive interactions, build user trust, and streamline the AI-assisted analysis workflow across multiple apps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T06:31:03Z)
• Safeguarding Marketing Research: The Generation, Identification, and Mitigation of AI-Fabricated Disinformation [0.26107298043931204]
  Generative AI has ushered in the ability to generate content that closely mimics human contributions. These models can be used to manipulate public opinion and distort perceptions, resulting in a decline in trust towards digital platforms. This study contributes to marketing literature and practice in three ways.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-17T13:08:28Z)
• AutoTRIZ: Artificial Ideation with TRIZ and Large Language Models [2.7624021966289605]
  Theory of Inventive Problem Solving is widely applied for systematic innovation. The complexity of TRIZ resources and concepts, coupled with its reliance on users' knowledge, experience, and reasoning capabilities, limits its practicality. This paper proposes AutoTRIZ, an artificial ideation tool that uses LLMs to automate and enhance the TRIZ methodology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T02:53:36Z)
• Testing autonomous vehicles and AI: perspectives and challenges from cybersecurity, transparency, robustness and fairness [53.91018508439669]
  The study explores the complexities of integrating Artificial Intelligence into Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) It examines the challenges introduced by AI components and the impact on testing procedures. The paper identifies significant challenges and suggests future directions for research and development of AI in AV technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T08:29:42Z)
• Machine Learning Insides OptVerse AI Solver: Design Principles and Applications [74.67495900436728]
  We present a comprehensive study on the integration of machine learning (ML) techniques into Huawei Cloud's OptVerse AI solver. We showcase our methods for generating complex SAT and MILP instances utilizing generative models that mirror multifaceted structures of real-world problem. We detail the incorporation of state-of-the-art parameter tuning algorithms which markedly elevate solver performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-11T15:02:15Z)
• Unleashing the potential of prompt engineering in Large Language Models: a comprehensive review [1.6006550105523192]
  Review explores the pivotal role of prompt engineering in unleashing the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) Examines both foundational and advanced methodologies of prompt engineering, including techniques such as self-consistency, chain-of-thought, and generated knowledge. Review also reflects the essential role of prompt engineering in advancing AI capabilities, providing a structured framework for future research and application.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T09:15:18Z)
• Methodological reflections for AI alignment research using human feedback [0.0]
  AI alignment aims to investigate whether AI technologies align with human interests and values and function in a safe and ethical manner. LLMs have the potential to exhibit unintended behavior due to their ability to learn and adapt in ways that are difficult to predict.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-22T14:27:33Z)
• The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and Strategies [97.5153823429076]
  The benefits, challenges and drawbacks of AI in this field are reviewed. The use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods are also discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-08T23:23:39Z)
• Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space [62.997667081978825]
  Counterfactual explanations aim to provide to end users a set of features that need to be changed in order to achieve a desired outcome. Current approaches rarely take into account the feasibility of actions needed to achieve the proposed explanations. We present Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space (CEILS), a methodology to generate counterfactual explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T20:48:48Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.