Human-Centered AI Product Prototyping with No-Code AutoML: Conceptual Framework, Potentials and Limitations
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.07933v2
- Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 11:09:17 GMT
- Title: Human-Centered AI Product Prototyping with No-Code AutoML: Conceptual Framework, Potentials and Limitations
- Authors: Mario Truss, Marc Schmitt,
- Abstract summary: This paper focuses on the challenges posed by the probabilistic nature of AI behavior and the limited accessibility of prototyping tools to non-experts.
A Design Science Research (DSR) approach is presented which culminates in a conceptual framework aimed at improving the AI prototyping process.
The framework describes the seamless incorporation of non-expert input and evaluation during prototyping, leveraging the potential of no-code AutoML to enhance accessibility and interpretability.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: This paper addresses the complexities inherent in AI product prototyping, focusing on the challenges posed by the probabilistic nature of AI behavior and the limited accessibility of prototyping tools to non-experts. A Design Science Research (DSR) approach is presented which culminates in a conceptual framework aimed at improving the AI prototyping process. Through a comprehensive literature review, key challenges were identified and no-code AutoML was analyzed as a solution. The framework describes the seamless incorporation of non-expert input and evaluation during prototyping, leveraging the potential of no-code AutoML to enhance accessibility and interpretability. A hybrid approach of combining naturalistic (case study) and artificial evaluation methods (criteria-based analysis) validated the utility of our approach, highlighting its efficacy in supporting AI non-experts and streamlining decision-making and its limitations. Implications for academia and industry, emphasizing the strategic integration of no-code AutoML to enhance AI product development processes, mitigate risks, and foster innovation, are discussed.
Related papers
- Safeguarding Marketing Research: The Generation, Identification, and Mitigation of AI-Fabricated Disinformation [0.26107298043931204]
Generative AI has ushered in the ability to generate content that closely mimics human contributions.
These models can be used to manipulate public opinion and distort perceptions, resulting in a decline in trust towards digital platforms.
This study contributes to marketing literature and practice in three ways.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-17T13:08:28Z) - AutoTRIZ: Artificial Ideation with TRIZ and Large Language Models [2.7624021966289605]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving is widely applied for systematic innovation.
The complexity of TRIZ resources and concepts, coupled with its reliance on users' knowledge, experience, and reasoning capabilities, limits its practicality.
This paper proposes AutoTRIZ, an artificial ideation tool that uses LLMs to automate and enhance the TRIZ methodology.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-13T02:53:36Z) - Asset-centric Threat Modeling for AI-based Systems [7.696807063718328]
This paper presents ThreatFinderAI, an approach and tool to model AI-related assets, threats, countermeasures, and quantify residual risks.
To evaluate the practicality of the approach, participants were tasked to recreate a threat model developed by cybersecurity experts of an AI-based healthcare platform.
Overall, the solution's usability was well-perceived and effectively supports threat identification and risk discussion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-11T08:40:01Z) - Testing autonomous vehicles and AI: perspectives and challenges from cybersecurity, transparency, robustness and fairness [53.91018508439669]
The study explores the complexities of integrating Artificial Intelligence into Autonomous Vehicles (AVs)
It examines the challenges introduced by AI components and the impact on testing procedures.
The paper identifies significant challenges and suggests future directions for research and development of AI in AV technology.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-21T08:29:42Z) - Machine Learning Insides OptVerse AI Solver: Design Principles and
Applications [74.67495900436728]
We present a comprehensive study on the integration of machine learning (ML) techniques into Huawei Cloud's OptVerse AI solver.
We showcase our methods for generating complex SAT and MILP instances utilizing generative models that mirror multifaceted structures of real-world problem.
We detail the incorporation of state-of-the-art parameter tuning algorithms which markedly elevate solver performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-11T15:02:15Z) - Combatting Human Trafficking in the Cyberspace: A Natural Language
Processing-Based Methodology to Analyze the Language in Online Advertisements [55.2480439325792]
This project tackles the pressing issue of human trafficking in online C2C marketplaces through advanced Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques.
We introduce a novel methodology for generating pseudo-labeled datasets with minimal supervision, serving as a rich resource for training state-of-the-art NLP models.
A key contribution is the implementation of an interpretability framework using Integrated Gradients, providing explainable insights crucial for law enforcement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-22T02:45:01Z) - Navigating the Complexity of Generative AI Adoption in Software
Engineering [6.190511747986327]
The adoption patterns of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools within software engineering are investigated.
Influencing factors at the individual, technological, and societal levels are analyzed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-12T11:05:19Z) - Methodological reflections for AI alignment research using human
feedback [0.0]
AI alignment aims to investigate whether AI technologies align with human interests and values and function in a safe and ethical manner.
LLMs have the potential to exhibit unintended behavior due to their ability to learn and adapt in ways that are difficult to predict.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-22T14:27:33Z) - The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and
Strategies [97.5153823429076]
The benefits, challenges and drawbacks of AI in this field are reviewed.
The use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods are also discussed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-08T23:23:39Z) - Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space [62.997667081978825]
Counterfactual explanations aim to provide to end users a set of features that need to be changed in order to achieve a desired outcome.
Current approaches rarely take into account the feasibility of actions needed to achieve the proposed explanations.
We present Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space (CEILS), a methodology to generate counterfactual explanations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-14T20:48:48Z) - An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive
qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence.
The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.